Skip to main content

Protein Identification Using Receptor Arrays and Mass Spectrometry

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Computational Biology

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((AEMB,volume 680))

  • 2577 Accesses

Abstract

Mass spectrometry is one of the main tools for protein identification in complex mixtures. When the sequence of the protein is known, we can check to see if the known mass distribution of peptides for a given protein is present in the recorded mass distribution of the mixture being analyzed. Unfortunately, this general approach suffers from high false-positive rates, since in a complex mixture, the likelihood that we will observe any particular mass distribution is high, whether or not the protein of interest is in the mixture. In this paper, we propose a scoring methodology and algorithm for protein identification that make use of a new experimental technique, which we call receptor arrays, for separating a mixture based on another differentiating property of peptides called isoelectric point (pI). We perform extensive simulation experiments on several genomes and show that additional information about peptides can achieve an average 30% reduction in false-positive rates over existing methods, while achieving very high true-positive identification rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For simplicity, in our experiments we assume that trypsin cleaves ideally, since we use the same mixture for all experiments; that is, this assumption does not bias the experimental accuracies.

  2. 2.

    It is typical to report mass/charge ratio in a spectrum, but we will use “mass” and “mass/charge” interchangeably in this paper.

References

  1. B. J. Cargile and J. L. Stephenson Jr. An alternative to tandem mass spectrometry: Isoelectric point and accurate mass for the identification of peptides. Anal. Chem., 76(2):267–275, 2004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Y. Combariza, E. Savariar, S. Thayumanavan, and R.W. Vachet. Isoelectric point dependent fractionation and detection of protein digests using polymeric nanoassemblies and MALDI-MS analysis. In Proceedings from the 56th ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry and Allied Topics, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Y. Combariza, E. N. Savariar, D. R. Vutukuri, S. Thayumanavan, and R. W. Vachet. Polymeric inverse micelles as selective peptide extraction agents for MALDI-MS analysis. Anal. Chem., 79(18):124–130, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. R. Craig and R. C. Beavis. A method for reducing the time required to match protein sequences with tandem mass spectra. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom., 17(20):2310–2316, 2003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Amal S. Essader, Benjamin J. Cargile, Jonathan L. Bundy, and James L. Stephenson. A comparison of immobilized ph gradient isoelectric focusing and strong-cation-exchange chromatography as a first dimension in shotgun proteomics. Proteomics, 5:24–34, 2005.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. E. Gasteiger, A. Gattiker, C. Hoogland, I. Ivanyi, R.D. Appel, and A. Bairoch. Expasy: The proteomics server for in-depth protein knowledge and analysis., 2003. http://www.expasy.org.

  7. L. Y. Geer, S. P. Markey, J. A. Kowalak, L. Wagner, M. Xu, D. M. Maynard, X. Yang, W. Shi, and S. H. Bryant. Open mass spectrometry search algorithm. J. Proteome Res., 3(5):958–964, 2004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Gomez-Escudero, M. A. Azagarsamy, N. Theddu, R. W. Vachet, and S. Thayumanavan. Selective peptide binding using facially amphiphilic dendrimers. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 130(33):11156–11163, 2008.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Keller, J. Eng, N. Zhang, X.-J. Li, and R. Aebersold. A uniform proteomics MS/MS analysis platform utilizing open XML file formats. Mol. Syst. Biol., 1:0017, 2005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. B. MacLean, J. K. Eng, R. C. Beavis, and M. McIntosh. General framework for developing and evaluating database scoring algorithms using the tandem search engine. Bioinformatics, 22(22):2830–2832, 2006.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. A. I. Nesvizhskii, O. Vitek, and R. Aebersold. Analysis and validation of proteomic data generated by tandem mass spectrometry. Nat. Meth., 4(10):787–797, 2007.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Palmblad, M. Ramström, K. E. Markides, P. H/a kansson, and J. Bergquist. Prediction of chromatographic retention and protein identification in liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem., 74(22):5826–5830, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. D. N. Perkins, D. J. C. Pappin, D. M. Creasy, and J. S. Cottrell. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis, 20(18):3551–3567, 1999.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Peter Rice, Ian Longden, and Alan Bleasby. EMBOSS: The European molecular biology open software suite. Trends Genet., 16(6):276–277, 2000.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. J. R. Yates, J. K. Eng, A. L. McCormack, and D. Schieltz. Method to correlate tandem mass spectra of modified peptides to amino acid sequences in protein database. Anal. Chem., 67(8):1426–1436, 1995.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

S. Thayumanavan in the Department of Chemistry at UMass Amherst for useful ideas and discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramgopal R. Mettu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this paper

Cite this paper

Langlois, T.R., Vachet, R.W., Mettu, R.R. (2010). Protein Identification Using Receptor Arrays and Mass Spectrometry. In: Arabnia, H. (eds) Advances in Computational Biology. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 680. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5913-3_39

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics