Skip to main content

Uterine Artery Embolization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Women’s Health in Interventional Radiology

Abstract

Uterine artery embolization has become a significant interventional procedure that is ­performed electively to treat symptoms related to symptomatic uterine leiomyoma. This chapter will deal with elective workup and management of uterine leiomyoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mäkinen J, Johansson J, Tomás C, et al. Morbidity of 10,110 hysterectomies by type of approach. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:1473–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Reed S, Newton K, Thompson L, et al. The incidence of repeat uterine surgery following myomectomy. J Womens Health. 2006;15(9):1046–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Goodwin SC, Vedantham S, McLucas B, et al. Preliminary experience with uterine artery embolization for uterine fibroids. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1997;8:517–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. ACOG Issues Opinion on Uterine Artery Embolization for Treatment of Fibroids. Presented at the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists annual clinical meeting, Philadelphia, PA. May 1–5, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pelage J, Julien C, Etienne P, et al. Uterine fibroid vascularization and clinical relevance to uterine fibroid embolization. Radiographics. 2005;25(special issue):99–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ligon A, Morton C. Leiomyomata: treatability and cytogenetic studies. Human Reproduction Update 2008;7:8.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ligon A, Morton C. Genetics of uterine leiomyomata. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2000;28:235.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Baird D, Dunson DB, Hill MC, et al. High cumulative incidence of uterine leiomyoma in black and white women: ultrasound evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:100–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rackow B, Arici A. Fibroids and in-vitro fertilization: which comes first? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2005;17:225–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lumsden M, Wallace E. Clinical presentation of uterine fibroids. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;12:177–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Uflacker R. Atlas of vascular anatomy. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007. p. 655–79.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gomez-Jorge J, Keyoung A, Levy E, et al. Uterine artery anatomy relevant to uterine leiomyomata embolization. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2003;26:522–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yeagley T, Goldberg J, Klein T, et al. Labial necrosis after uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100(5 part 1):881–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vott S, Bonilla S, Goodwin S, et al. CT findings after uterine artery embolization. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2000;24:846–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ghai S, Rajan D, Benjamin M, Asch M, Gahi S. Uterine artery embolization for leiomyomas: pre and post procedural evaluation with US. Radiographics. 2005;25:1159–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lev-Toaff A, Toaff M, Liu J, et al. Value of sonohysterography in the diagnosis and management of abnormal uterine bleeding. Radiology. 1996;201:179–84.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Becker Jr E, Lev-Toaff A, Kaufmann E, et al. The added value of transvaginal sonohysterography over transvaginal sonography alone in women with known or suspected leiomyoma. J Ultrasound Med. 2002;21:237–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fedele L, Bianchi S, Dorta M, Brioschi D, et al. Transvaginal ultrasonography versus hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of uterine submucosal myomas. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77:745–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pron G, Bennett J, Common A, et al. The Ontario Uterine Fibroid Embolization Trial II. Uterine fibroid reduction and symptom relief after uterine artery embolization for fibroids. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:120–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tranquart F, Brunereau L, Cottier J, et al. Prospective sonographic assessment of uterine artery embolization for the treatment of fibroids. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;19:81–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Goodwin S, Bonilla S, Sacks D, et al. Reporting standards for uterine artery embolization for the treatment of uterine leiomyomata. J Vasc Intervent Radiol. 2001;12:1011–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ascher S, Arnold L, Patt R, et al. Adenomyosis: prospective comparison of MR imaging and transvaginal sonography. Radiology. 1994;190:803–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Togashi K, Ozasa H, Konishi I, et al. Enlarged uterus: differentiation between adenomyosis and leiomyoma with MR imaging. Radiology. 1989;171:531–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Reinhold C, Tafazoli F, Mehio A, et al. Uterine adenomyosis: endovaginal US and MR imaging features with histopathologic correlation. Radiographics. 1999;19:147–60.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Atri M, Reinhold C, Mehio A, Chapman W, et al. Adenomyosis: US features with histologic correlation in an in vitro study. Radiology. 2000;215:783–90.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Imaoka I, Wada A, Matsuo M, Yoshida M, et al. MR imaging of disorders associated with female infertility: use in diagnosis, treatment, and management. Radiographics. 2003;23:1401–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. McLucas B, Perrella R, Goodwin S, et al. Role of uterine artery Doppler flow in fibroid embolization. J Ultrasound Med. 2002;21:113–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Weintraub J, Romano W, Kirsch M, Sam-paleanu D, et al. Uterine artery embolization: sonographic imaging findings. J Ultrasound Med. 2002;21:633–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nicholson T, Pelage J, Ettles D. Fibroid calcification after uterine artery embolization: ultrasonographic appearance and pathology. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;12:443–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mayer D, Shipilov V. Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging of uterine fibroids. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1995;22:667–725.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hricak H, Tscholakoff D, Heinrichs L, et al. Uterine leiomyomas: correlation of MR, histopathologic findings, and symptoms. Radiology. 1986;158:385–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Dudiak C, Turner D, Patel C, et al. Uterine leiomyomas in the infertile patient: preoperative localization with MR imaging versus US and hysterosalpingography. Radiology. 1988;167:627–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Zawin M, McCarthy S, Scoutt L, et al. High-field MRI and US evaluation of the pelvis in women with leiomyomas. Magn Reson Imaging. 1990;8:371–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Prayson R, Hart W. Pathologic considerations of uterine smooth muscle tumors. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1995;22:637–57.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Yamashita Y, Torashima M, Takahashi M, et al. Hyperintense uterine leiomyoma at T2-weighted MR imaging: differentiation with dynamic enhanced MR imaging and clinical implications. Radiology. 1993;189:721–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Okizuka H, Sugimura K, Takemori M, et al. MR detection of degenerating uterine leiomyomas. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1993;17:760–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kawakami S, Togashi K, Konishi I, et al. Red degeneration of uterine leiomyoma: MR appearance. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1994;18:925–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Bradley Jr WG. MR appearance of hemorrhage in the brain. Radiology. 1993;189:15–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Mittl Jr RL, Yeh IT, Kressel HY. High signal intensity rim surrounding uterine leiomyomas on MR images; pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1991;180:81–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Novak E. Novak’s gynecologic and obstetric pathology. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1979. p. 280–90.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mark AS, Hricak H, Heinrichs LW, et al. Adenomyosis and leiomyoma: differential diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology. 1987;163:527–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Togashi K, Nishimura K, Itoh K, et al. Adenomyosis: diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology. 1988;166:111–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Reinhold C, McCarthy S, Bret P, et al. Diffuse adenomyosis: comparison of endovaginal US and MR imaging with histopathologic correlation. Radiology. 1996;199:151–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Outwater E, Siegelman E, Van Deerlin V. Adenomyosis; current concepts and imaging considerations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170:437–41.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Weinreb J, Barkoff N, Megibow A, et al. The value of MR imaging in distinguishing leiomyomas from other solid pelvic masses when sonography is indeterminate. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990;154:295–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Troiano R, Lazzarini K, Scoutt L, et al. Fibroma and fibrothecoma of the ovary: MR imaging findings. Radiology. 1997;204:795–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Outwater EK, Eigelman ES, Kim B, et al. Ovarian Brenner tumors: MR imaging characteristics. Magn Reson Imaging. 1998;16:1147–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Keir R, McCarthy SM, Scoutt LM, et al. Pelvic masses in pregnancy: MR imaging. Radiology. 1990;176:709–13.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Togashi K, Kawakami S, Kimura I, et al. Uterine contractions: possible diagnostic pitfall at MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1993;2:889–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Togashi K, Kawakami S, Kimura I, et al. Sustained uterine contractions: a cause of hypointense myometrial bulging. Radiology. 1993;187:707–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Pattani SJ, Kier R, Deal R, Luchansky E. MRI of uterine leiomyosarcoma. Magn Reson Imaging. 1995;12:331–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Leibsohn S, d’Ablaing G, Mishell Jr DR, Schlaerth JB. Leiomyosarcoma in a series of ­hysterectomies performed for presumed uterine leiomyomas. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;162:968–76.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Parker W, Fu Y, Berek J. Uterine sarcoma in patients operated on for presumed leiomyoma and rapidly growing leiomyoma. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;83:414–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Andrews R, Spies J, Sacks D, et al. Patient care and uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20(7):S307–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. McLucas B, Goodwin S, Adler L, et al. Pregnancy following uterine fibroid embolization. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001;74:1–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Ravina J, Vigneron N, Aymard A, et al. Pregnancy after embolization of uterine myoma: report of 12 cases. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:1241–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Mara M, Maskova J, Fucikova Z, et al. Midterm clinical and first reproductive results of a randomized controlled trial comparing uterine fibroid embolization and myomectomy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2008;31:73–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Usadi R, Marshburn PB. The impact of uterine artery embolization on fertility and pregnancy outcome. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;19:279–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Holub Z, Mara M, Kuzel D, et al. Pregnancy outcomes after uterine artery occlusion: prospective multicentric study. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:1886–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Verma S, Bergin D, Gonsalves C, et al. Submucosal fibroids becoming endocavitary following uterine artery embolization: risk assessment by MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:1220–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Spies J, Roth AR, Jha R, et al. Uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata: factors associated with successful symptomatic and imaging outcome. Radiology. 2002;222:45–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Kim MD, Kim S, Kim NK, et al. Long-term results of uterine artery embolization for ­symptomatic adenomyosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:176–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Goldberg J. Uterine artery embolization for adenomyosis: looking at the glass half full. Radiology. 2005;236:1111–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Venkatesan A, Kundu S, Sacks D, et al. Practice guideline for adult antibiotic prophylaxis during vascular and interventional radiology procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21(11):1611–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Molgaard CP, Teitelbaum GP, Pentecost MJ, et al. Intraarterial administration of lidocaine for analgesia in hepatic chemoembolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1990;1:81–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Gordon I, Westcott J. Intra-arterial lidocaine: an effective analgesic for peripheral angiography. Radiology. 1977;124:43–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Keyoung J, Levy E, Roth A, et al. Intraarterial lidocaine for pain control after uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;12(9):1065–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Volkers NA, Hehenkamp WJ, Birnie E, et al. Uterine artery embolization in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroid tumors (EMMY Trial): periprocedural results and complications. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006;17(3):471–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Lampmann LE, Lohle PN, Smeets A, et al. Management during uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2007;30(4):809–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Stokes L, Wallace M, Godwin R, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for uterine artery embolization for symptomatic leiomyomas. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21(8):1153–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Walker WJ, Pelage J. Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic fibroids: clinical results in 400 women with imaging follow up. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;109:1262–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Spies J, Bruno J, Czeyda-Pommersheim F, et al. Long-term outcome of uterine artery embolization of leiomyomas. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:933–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Spies JJ, Myers ER, Worthington-Kirsch R, et al. The FIBROID Registry: symptom and quality of life status 1 year after therapy. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:1309–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Healey S, Buzaglo K, Seti L, et al. Ovarian function after uterine artery embolization and hysterectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004;11:348–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Speis JB, Roth AR, Gonsalves SM, Murphy-Skryniarz KM. Ovarian function after uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata: assessment with use of serum follicle stimulating hormone assay. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;12:437–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Tropenano G, Di Stasi C, Litwicka K, et al. Uterine artery embolization for fibroids does not have adverse effects on ovarian reserve in regularly cycling women younger than 40 years. Fertil Steril. 2004;8:1055–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Carpenter TT, Walker WJ. Pregnancy following uterine artery embolization for symptomatic fibroids: a series of 26 completed pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;112:321–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Pron G, Mocarski E, Bennett J, et al. Pregnancy after uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata: The Ontario Multicenter Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:67–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Mauro M, Murphy K, Thomson K, et al. Image-guided interventions. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Vashisht A, Studd J, Carey A, Burn P. Fatal septicaemia after fibroid embolization. Lancet. 1999;354:307–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Lanocita R, Frigerio LF, Patelli G et al. A fatal complication of percutaneous transcatheter embolization for the treatment of uterine fibroids. Presented at the SMIT/CIMIT 11th Annual Scientific Meeting, Boston, MA. September 16–18, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Pelage J, Le Dref O, Jacob D, et al. Selective arterial embolization of the uterine arteries in the management of intractable post-partum hemorrhage. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999;78:698–703.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Andersen PE, Lund N, Justesen P, et al. Uterine artery embolization of symptomatic uterine fibroids. Initial success and short-term results. Acta Radiol. 2001;42:234–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Pelage J, Le Dref O, Soyer P, et al. Arterial anatomy of the female genital tract: variations and relevance to transcatheter embolization of the uterus. Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172:989–94.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shawn N. Sarin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sarin, S.N., Baarson, C., Hanif, S., Awan, Y., Venbrux, A.C. (2012). Uterine Artery Embolization. In: Ignacio, E., Venbrux, A. (eds) Women’s Health in Interventional Radiology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5876-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5876-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5875-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-5876-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics