Skip to main content

In Situ Optical Sensing and State Estimation for Control of Surface Processing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Feedback Control of MEMS to Atoms

Abstract

Many industrial processes involve the modification of surfaces. The semiconductor and microelectronics industries are extremely reliant upon surface processing [1], but other applications include solar cells, MEMS and microfluidics, thermal barrier coatings, and fuel cells. Optical measurements are commonly used to indirectly quantify the surface and bulk properties of materials. Unlike direct imaging methods, in which the local surface topography is visualized, indirect methods provide information on surface and bulk properties which are averaged over the entire area being sampled. Typically, a beam of light is directed at the surface to be measured, and the light interacts with the surface to produce the reflected or diffracted light that is then measured by a photodetector. One advantage of indirect measurement techniques is that they are non-invasive, and therefore can be used in extreme or harsh processing environments such as vacuum chambers and reaction vessels by passing the light through windows. These in situ optical sensors have been used for process control of film thickness and chemical composition. However, many more microscopic and nanoscale surface properties can be measured and potentially controlled using optical sensors. The barriers include the difficulty of modeling the optical response, the difficulty of inverting these relationships to robustly infer surface properties, and the practicality of including windows on the chamber to enable optical access. However, to create precise nanostructures in a high-throughput manufacturing setting, real-time measurement and control will be required, and optical sensors are expected to play a significant role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. T.F. Edgar, S.W. Butler, W.J. Campbell, C. Pfeiffer, C. Bode, S.B. Hwang, B.S. Balakrishnan, and J. Hahn, “Automatic control in microelectronics manufacturing: Practices, challenges, and possibilities,” Automatica, vol. 36, pp. 1567–1603, 2000.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Freed, M. Kruger, C.J. Spanos, and K. Poolla, “Autonomous on-wafer sensors for process modeling, diagnosis, and control,” IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, vol. 14, pp. 255–264, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. I.P. Herman, Optical diagnostics for thin film processing. San Diego, CA, Academic Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. O. Auciello and A.R. Krauss, In-situ real-time characterization of thin films. New York, NY, John Wiley and Sons, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H.G. Tompkins and E.A. Irene, Handbook of ellipsometry. Heidelberg, Springer, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Theory and practice of radiation thermometry. New York, NY, John Wiley and Sons, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Z.M. Zhang, “Surface temperature measurement using optical techniques,” Annual Review of Heat Transfer, vol. 11, pp. 351–411, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  8. F. Roozeboom, “Rapid thermal-processing systems - A review with emphasis on temperature control,” Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B, vol. 8, pp. 1249–1259, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  9. F.Y. Sorrell, S. Yu, and W.J. Kiether, “Applied RTP optical modeling: an argument for model-based control,” IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, vol. 7, pp. 454–459, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Emami-Naeini, J.L. Ebert, D. deRoover, R.L. Kosut, M. Dettori, L.M.L. Porter, and S. Ghosal, “Modeling and control of distributed thermal systems,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 11, pp. 668–683, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  11. W.G. Breiland, “Reflectance-correcting pyrometry in thin film deposition applications,” Albuquerque, NM 871852003.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J.R. Creighton, W.G. Breiland, D.D. Koleske, G. Thaler, and M.H. Crawford, “Emissivity-correcting mid-infrared pyrometry for group-III nitride MOCVD temperature measurement and control,” Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 310, pp. 1062–1068, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  13. C. Chityuttakan, P. Chinvetkitvanich, K. Yoodee, and S. Chatraphorn, “In situ monitoring of the growth of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin films,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 90, pp. 3124–3129, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  14. K.A. Snail and C.M. Marks, “In situ diamond growth rate measurement using emission interferometry,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 60, pp. 3135–3137, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Z.H. Zhou and R. Reif, “Epi-film thickness measurements using emission Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy-Part II: Real-time in situ process monitoring and control,” IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, vol. 8, pp. 340–345, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Y.H. Zhou and Z.M. Zhang, “Radiative properties of semitransparent silicon wafers with rough surfaces,” Transactions of the ASME, vol. 125, pp. 462–470, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Z.L. Akkerman, Y. Song, Z. Yin, and R.W. Smith, “In situ determination of the surface roughness of diamond films using optical pyrometry,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 72, pp. 903–905, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J.P. Hebb, K.F. Jensen, and J. Thomas, “The effect of surface roughness on the radiative properties of patterned silicon wafers,” IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, vol. 11, pp. 607–614, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  19. W.G. Breiland and K.P. Killeen, “A virtual interface method for extracting growth rates and high temperature optical constants from thin semiconductor films using in situ normal incidence reflectance,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 78, pp. 6726–6736, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  20. W.W. Woo, S.A. Svoronos, H.O. Sankur, J. Bajaj, and S.J.C. Irvine, “In situ estimation of MOCVD growth rate via a modified Kalman filter,” AIChE Journal, vol. 42, pp. 1319–1325, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. Xiong, P.J. Wissmann, and M.A. Gallivan, “An extended Kalman filter for in situ sensing of yttria-stabilized zirconia in chemical vapor deposition,” Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 30, pp. 1657–1669, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  22. T.L. Vincent, P.P. Khargonekar, and F.L. Terry, “An extended Kalman filtering-based method of processing reflectometry data for fast in-situ etch rate measurements,” IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, vol. 10, pp. 42–51, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  23. D.G. Robertson and J.H. Lee, “A moving horizon-based approach for least-squares estimation,” AIChE Journal, vol. 42, pp. 2209–2224, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  24. R. Xiong and M.A. Grover, “In situ estimation of thin film growth rate, complex refractive index, and roughness during chemical vapor deposition using a modified moving horizon estimator,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 103, p. 124901, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. Xiong and M.A. Grover, “A modified moving horizon estimator for in situ sensing of a chemical vapor deposition process,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 17, pp. 1228–1235, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  26. E.L. Haseltine and J.B. Rawlings, “Critical evaluation of extended Kalman filtering and moving-horizon estimation,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 44, pp. 2451–2460, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  27. T.L. Vincent, P.P. Khargonekar, and F.L. Terry, “End point and etch rate control using dual-wavelength laser reflectometry with a nonlinear estimator,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 144, pp. 2467–2472, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  28. L.L. Lee, C.D. Schaper, and W.K. Ho, “Real-time predictive control of photoresist film thickness uniformity,” IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, vol. 15, pp. 51–59, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  29. C.D. Zuiker, D.M. Gruen, and A.R. Krauss, “In situ laser relectance interferometry measurement of diamond film growth,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 79, pp. 3541–3547, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Z. Yin, H.S. Tan, and F.W. Smith, “Determination of the optical constants of diamond films with a rough growth surface,” Diamond and Related Materials, vol. 5, pp. 1490–1496, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  31. J.L. Luo, X.T. Ting, P.N. Wang, and L.Y. Chen, “Study on the growth of CVD diamond thin films by in situ reflectivity measurement,” Diamond and Related Materials, vol. 11, pp. 1871–1875, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  32. G. Comina, J. Rodriquez, J.L. Solis, and W. Estrada, “In situ laser reflectometry measurements of pyrolytic ZnO film growth,” Measurement Science and Technology, vol. 16, pp. 685–690, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  33. R.S. Balmer, C. Pickering, A.J. Pidduck, and T. Martin, “Modelling the high temperature optical constants and surface roughness evolution during MOVPE growth of GaN using in-situ spectral reflectometry,” Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 245, pp. 198–206, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  34. K. Tang, P.A. Kawka, and R.O. Buckius, “Geometric optics applied to rough surfaces coated with an absorbing thin film,” Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer, vol. 13, pp. 169–176, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  35. C.K. Carniglia, “Scalar scattering theory for multilayer optical coatings,” Optical Engineering, vol. 18, pp. 104–115, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  36. H. Fujiwara, J. Koh, P.I. Rovira, and R.W. Collins, “Assessment of effective-medium theories in the analysis of nucleation and microscopic surface roughness evolution for semiconductor thin films,” Physical Review B, vol. 61, pp. 10832–10844, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  37. D.E. Aspnes, “Minimal-data approaches for determining outer-layer dielectric responses of films from kinetic reflectometric and ellipsometric measurements,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 62, pp. 343–345, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  38. I.K. Kim and D.E. Aspnes, “Analytic determination of n, k, and d of an absorbing film from polarimetric data in the thin-film limit,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 101, p. 033109, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  39. K. Flock, “The simultaneous determination of n, k, and t from polarimetric data,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 455–456, pp. 349–355, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  40. D.E. Aspnes, J.B. Theeten, and F. Hottier, “Investigation of effective-medium models of microscopic roughness by spectroscopic ellipsometry,” Physical Review B, vol. 20, pp. 3292–3302, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  41. D.E. Aspnes, W.E. Quinn, M.C. Tamargo, S. Gregory, S.A. Schwarz, M.A.A. Pudensi, M.J.S.P. Brasil, and R.E. Nahory, “Closed-loop control of growth of semiconductor materials and structures by spectroellipsometry,” Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology A, vol. 10, pp. 1840–1841, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  42. S.C. Warnick and M.A. Dahleh, “Feedback control of MOCVD growth of submicron compound semiconductor films,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 6, pp. 62–71, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  43. A. Kussmaul, S. Vernon, P.C. Colter, R. Sudharsanan, A. Mastrovito, K.J. Linden, N.H. Karam, S.C. Warnick, and M.A. Dahleh, “In-situ monitoring and control for MOCVD growth of AlGaAs and InGaAs,” Journal of Electronic Materials, vol. 26, pp. 1145–1153, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  44. S.A. Middlebrooks and J.B. Rawlings, “State estimation approach for determining composition and growth rate of Si(1-x)Ge(x) chemical vapor deposition utilizing real-time ellipsometric measurements,” Applied Optics, vol. 45, pp. 7043–7055, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  45. S.A. Middlebrooks and J.B. Rawlings, “Model predictive control of Si(1-x)Ge(x) thin film chemical-vapor deposition,” IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, vol. 20, pp. 114–125, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  46. “The international technology roadmap for semiconductors,” 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  47. C.T. Lee, R.A. Lawson, and C.L. Henderson, “Understanding the effects of photoacid distribution homogeneity and diffusivity on critical dimension control and line edge roughness in chemically amplified resists,” Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B, vol. 26, pp. 2276–2280, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  48. R.A. Lawson, C.T. Lee, W. Yueh, L. Tolbert, and C.L. Henderson, “Epoxide functionalized molecular resists for high resolution electron-beam lithography,” Microelectronic Engineering, vol. 85, pp. 959–962, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  49. M. Adel, D. Kandel, V. Levinski, J. Seligson, and A. Kuniavsky, “Diffraction order control in overlay metrology - a review of the roadmap options,” in Proceedings of the SPIE: Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control in Microlithography XXII San Jose, CA, 2008, pp. 692202–692201.

    Google Scholar 

  50. D.C. Wack, J. Hench, L. Poslavsky, J. Fielden, V. Zhuang, W. Mieher, and T. Dziura, “Opportunities and challenges for optical CD metrology in double patterning process control,” in Proceedings of the SPIE: Metrology, Inspection and Process Control for Microlithography XXII. vol. 6922, J. Allgair and C. Raymond, Eds. San Jose, CA, 2008, p. 69221N.

    Google Scholar 

  51. K.L. Choy, “Chemical vapour deposition of coatings,” Progress in Materials Science, vol. 48, pp. 57–170, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  52. W.J. Desisto and B.J. Rappoli, “Ultraviolet absorption sensors for precursor delivery rate control for metalorganic chemical vapor deposition of multiple component oxide thin films,” Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 191, pp. 290–293, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  53. M. Born and E.R. Wolf, Principles of optics: Electromagnetic theory of propagation, interference, and diffraction of light. Oxford, Pergamon, 1980.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. A.W. Crook, “The reflection and transmission of light by any system of parallel isotropic films,” Journal of the Optical Society of America, vol. 38, p. 954963, 1948.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  55. O. Heavens, Optical properties of thin solid films. New York, Academic Press, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  56. R.F. Stengel, Optimal control and estimation. Mineola, NY, Dover Publications, 1994.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  57. R. Hermann and A.J. Krener, “Nonlinear controllability and observability,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 22, pp. 728–740, 1977.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  58. H. Nijmeijer, “Observability of autonomous discrete time non-linear systems: a geometric approach,” International Journal of Control, vol. 36, pp. 867–874, 1982.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  59. G.E. Jellison and F.A. Modine, “Optical functions of silicon at elevated temperatures,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 76, pp. 3758–3761, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  60. E.D. Palik Handbook of the optical constants of solids. Orlando, Academic, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  61. G. Hu, Y. Lou, and P.D. Christofides, “Model parameter estimation and feedback control of surface roughness in a sputtering process,” Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 63, pp. 1800–1816, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation, entitled “CAREER: A Systems Approach to Materials Processing.” The research described in this chapter was performed with graduate student Rentian Xiong, with additional support on the experimental work by Paul Wissmann. Helpful discussions with Georgia Tech Professors Jay Lee and Ian Ferguson are appreciated. The generous contribution of the e-beam image of a lithographically patterned surface by Georgia Tech Professor Cliff Henderson and graduate student Richard Lawson is also gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rentian Xiong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Xiong, R., Grover, M.A. (2012). In Situ Optical Sensing and State Estimation for Control of Surface Processing. In: Gorman, J., Shapiro, B. (eds) Feedback Control of MEMS to Atoms. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5832-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5832-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5831-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-5832-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics