Abstract
Mathematical models provide abstract representations of the information gained from experimental observations on the structure and function of a particular biological system. Conferring a predictive character on a given mathematical formulation often relies on determining a number of non-measurable parameters that largely condition the model’s response. These parameters can be usually estimated by fitting the model to experimental data. This chapter covers the parameter identification problem, its formulation and solution, and two closely related topics: identifiability and optimal experimental design.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Balsa-Canto E, Alonso AA, Banga JR (2008a) Computational procedures for optimal experimental design in biological systems. IET Syst Biol 2(4):163–172
Balsa-Canto E, Peifer M, Banga JR et al (2008b) Hybrid optimization method with general switching strategy for parameter estimation. BMC Syst Biol 2:26
Banga JR, Versyck KJ, Van Impe JF (2002) Computation of optimal identification experiments for nonlinear dynamic process models: an stochastic global optimization approach. Ind Eng Chem Res 41, 2425–2430
Bock H (1981) Numerical treatment of inverse problems in chemical reaction kinetics. In: K E, P D, W J (eds) Modelling of chemical reaction systems. Springer, New York
Bock H (1983) Recent advances in parameter identification techniques for ordinary differential equations. In: P D, E H (ed) Numerical treatment of inverse problems in Differential and Integral Birkhäuser
Cho KH, Wolkenhauer O (2003) Analysis and modelling of signal transduction pathways in systems biology. Biochem Soc Trans 31:1503–1509
Dennis JE, Gay DM and Welsch RE (1981) An adaptive nonlinear least-squares algorithm. ACM Trans Math Software 7(3)
Dréo J, Petrowski A, Taillard E, Siarry P (2006) Metaheuristics for hard optimization. Methods and case studies. Springer, New York
Egea JA, Rodriguez-Fernandez M, Banga JR, Martí R (2007). Scatter search for chemical and bioprocess optimization. J Glob Opt 37(3):481–503
Esposito WR, Floudas C (2000) Global optimization for the parameter estimation of differential-algebraic systems. Ind Eng Chem Res 39:1291–1310
Fletcher R. (1987) Practical methods of optimization. Wiley, UK
Floudas CA (2000) Deterministic global optimization: theory, methods and applications. Kluwer Academics, Netherlands
Gau CY, Stadtherr MA (2000) Reliable nonlinear parameter estimation using interval analysis: error in variable approach. Comp Chem Eng 24:631–637
Goodwin BC (1965) Oscillatory behavior in enzymatic control processes. Adv Enz Regul 3:425–428
Hairer E, Nørsett SP, Wanner G (1993) Solving ordinary differential equations I: Nonstiff problems, 2nd edn, Springer, Berlin
Hairer E, Wanner G (1996) Solving ordinary differential equations II: Stiff and differential-algebraic problems, 2nd edn, Springer, Berlin
Hindmarsh AC, Brown PN, Grant KE, Lee SL, Serban R, Shumaker DE, Woodward CS (2005). Sundials: Suite of nonlinear and differential/algebraic equation solvers. ACM Trans Math Softw 31(3):363–396
Hoffmann A, Levchenko A, Scott ML, Baltimore D (2002) The IkB-NF-kB signaling module: temporal control and selective gene activation. Science 298:1241–1245
Janes KA, Lauffenburger DA (2006) A biological approach to computational models of proteomic networks. Curr Op Chem Biol 10:73–80
Klipp E, Liebermeister W (2006) Mathematical modelling of intracellular signaling pathways. BMC Neurosci 7, doi:10.1186/1471-2202-7-S1-S10
Lee EG, Boone DL, Chai S, Libby SL, Chien M, Lodolce JP, Ma A (2000) Failure to regulate TNF-induced NF-·B and cell death responses in A20-deficient mice. Science 289:2350–2354
Leis JR, Kramer MA (1988) Odessa- an ordinary differential-equation solver with explicit simultaneous sensitivity analysis. ACM Trans Math Soft 14:61–67
Lin Y, Stadtherr MA (2006) Deterministic global optimization for parameter estimation of dynamic systems. Ind Eng Chem Res 45:8438–8448
Lipniacki T, Paszek P, Brasier AR et al (2004) Mathematical model of NFκB regulatory module. J Theor Biol 228:195–215
Ljung L (1999) System identification: theory for the user. Prentice Hall, NJ
Mendes P, Kell DB (1998) Nonlinear optimization of biochemical pathways: Applications to metabolic engineering and parameter estimation. Bioinformatics 14:869–883
Moles C, Mendes P, Banga J (2003) Parameter estimation in biochemical pathways: a comparison of global optimization methods. Genome Res 13:2467–2474
Nash SG, Sofer A (1996) Linear and nonlinear programming. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY
Nelder JA, Mead R (1965) A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J 7:308–313
Pardalos P, Romeijna H, Tuyb H (2000) Recent developments and trends in global optimization. J Comp App Math 124:209–228
Peifer M, Timmer J (2007) Parameter estimation in ordinary differential equations for biochemical processes using the method of multiple shooting. IET Syst Biol 1(2):78–88
Pinter J (1996) Global optimization in action. Continuous and Lipschitz optimization: Algorithms, implementations and applications. Kluwer, Netherlands
Polisetty P, Voit E, Gatzke E (2006) Identification of metabolic system parameters using global optimization methods. Theor Biol Med Mod 3:4
Rodriguez-Fernandez M, Egea JA, Banga JR (2006a) Novel metaheuristic for parameter estimation in nonlinear dynamic biological systems. BMC Bioinform 7:483
Rodriguez-Fernandez M, Mendes P, Banga JR (2006b) A hybrid approach for efficient and robust parameter estimation in biochemical pathways. Bio Syst 83(2–3):248–265
Runarsson T, Yao X (2000) Stochastic ranking for constrained evolutionary optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comp 564:284–294
Schittkowski K (2002) Numerical data fitting in dynamical systems. Kluwer, Netherlands
Seber GAF, Wild CJ (1989) Nonlinear regression. Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics. Wiley, New York
Storn R, Price K (1997) Differential evolution – a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J Global Optim 11:341–359
Sugimoto M, Kikuchi S, Tomita M (2005) Reverse engineering of biochemical equations from time-course data by means of genetic programming. BioSystems 80:155–164
Swameye I, Müller T, Timmer J et al (2003) Identification of nucleocytoplasmic cycling as a remote sensor in cellular signaling by data-based modeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100(3):1028–1033
Vera J, Balsa-Canto E, Wellstead P et al (2007) Power-law models of signal transduction pathways. Cell Signal 19:1531–1541
Walter E, Pronzato L (1997) Identification of parametric models from experimental data. Springer, New York
Wolkenhauer O, Ullah M, Kolch W et al (2004) Modeling and simulation of intracellular dynamics: Choosing an appropriate framework. IEEE Trans. Nanobiosci 3(3):200–207
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge financial support from Spanish MICINN project “MultiSysBio,” ref. DPI2008-06880-C03-02.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Balsa-Canto, E., Banga, J.R. (2010). Computational Procedures for Model Identification. In: Choi, S. (eds) Systems Biology for Signaling Networks. Systems Biology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5797-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5797-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5796-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-5797-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)