Skip to main content

Moisture Sensitivity Level (MSL) Capability of Plastic-Encapsulated Packages

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Moisture Sensitivity of Plastic Packages of IC Devices
  • 2447 Accesses

Abstract

While it is fairly common to achieve MSL 1 (85°C/85% RH, 168 h) compliance with a standard eutectic lead/tin solder reflow range of 220–235°C, the ability to extrapolate to 260°C is proving very difficult. The usual failure mode in moisture sensitivity testing is delamination at the various interfaces of the package followed most of the time by fracture of the mold compound material, the well-known popcorn-cracking phenomena. The primary objective of this chapter is to correlate adhesion and subsequent delamination with various mold compound properties in an attempt to determine which properties from a user standpoint are important in the selection of a proper mold compound to withstand the stresses induced by MSL 1 moisture loading and subsequent reflow at 260°C. Moisture diffusion and adhesion characteristics of various mold compound chemistries are investigated to determine whether these properties can be correlated with MSL 260°C performance. The ultimate goal is to determine whether it is possible to predict compound properties that can be used as a screening method to compare and choose the best candidate compounds. Adhesion performance to bare copper is investigated as a function of moisture loading and reflow. The ability of a dry package to meet MSL performance is established through adhesion testing and actual package performance. Moisture absorption characteristics are then studied. Lastly MSL performance data on actual product at both MSL 1 and 3 conditions are presented. A correlation analysis is performed between moisture absorption data, adhesion, and MSL performance which establishes several conclusions which are discussed. Of primary importance is data analysis which shows the combination of room temperature, adhesion strength, and low moisture absorption to be a good predictor variable for performance of a mold compound when exposed to MSL testing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fan, X.J., Zhou, J., Zhang, G.Q., Ernst, L.J., “A amicromechanics based vapor pressure model in electronic packages”, ASME Journal of Electronic Packaging, 127(3), 262–267, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gallo, A., Munamarty, R., “Popcorning: a failure mechanism in plastic encapsulated microcircuits”, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 44(3), 362–367, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stellrecht, E., Bongtae, H., Pecht, M., “Characterization of hygroscopic swelling behavior of mold compound and plastic packages”, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology, 27(3), 499–506, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lebbai, M., Kim, J.K., Yuen, M.M.F., “Effects of moisture and elevated temperature on reliability of interfacial adhesion in plastic packages”, Journal of Electronic Materials, 32(6), 574–582, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ardebili, H., Wong, E.H., Pecht, M., “Hygroscopic swelling and sorption characteristics of epoxy molding compounds used in electronic packaging”, IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies, 26(1), 206–214, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Omi, S., Fujita, K., Tsuda, T., Maeda, T., “Causes of cracks in SMD and type specific remedies”, IEEE Transactions on Components, Hybrids, and Manufacturing Technology, 14(4), 818–823, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Alpern, P., Dudek, R., Schmidt, R., Wicher, V., Tilgner, R., “On the mode II popcorn effect in thin packages”, IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies, 25(1), 56–65, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Alpern, P., Lee, K.C., Dudek, R., Tilgner, R., “A simple model for the mode I popcorn effect for IC packages with copper leadframe”, Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies, 25(2), 301–308, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tay, A.A.O., Lin, T.Y., “Moisture diffusion and heat transfer in plastic IC package”, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology, Part A, 19(2), 186–193, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ganesan, G.S., Berg, H.M., “Model and analysis for solder reflow cracking phenomena in SMT plastic packages”, IEEE Transactions on Components, Hybrids, and Manufacturing Technology, 16(8), 940–948, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fan, X.J., Zhang, G.Q., van Driel, W.D., Ernst, L.J. “Interfacial delamination mechanisms during reflow with moisture preconditioning”, IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies, 31(2), 252–259, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. van Driel, W.D., van Gils, M.A.J, Fan, X.J., Zhang, G.Q., Ernst, L.J., “Driving mechanisms of delamination related reliability problems in exposed pad packages”, IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies, 31(2), 260–268, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fauty, J. Cada, L.G. Stana, M., “Effect of 260°C reflow on the ability of mold compounds to meet moisture sensitivity level one (MSL1)”, IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies, 28(4), 841–851, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shook, R.L., Goodelle, J.P., “Handling of highly-moisture sensitive components – an analysis of low-humidity containment and baking schedules”, IEEE Transactions on Electronics Packaging Manufacturing, 23(02), 81–86, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shook, R.L., Conrad, T.R., Sastry, V.S., Steele, D.B., “Diffusion model to derate moisture sensitive surface mount IC’s for factory use conditions”, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology – Part C, 19(2), 110–118, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mercado, L.L., Chavez, B., “Impact of JEDEC test conditions on new-generation package reliability”, Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies, 25(2), 204–210, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Huang, Y.E., Hagen, D., Dody, G., Burnette, T., ”How reflow temperatures affect BGA delamination”, Surface Mount Technology, 13(2), 154–157, 999.

    Google Scholar 

  18. McCluskey, P., Munamarty, R., Pecht, M., “Popcorning in PBGA packages during IR reflow soldering”, Microelectronics International, No. 42, 20–23, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Love, B., Packman, P., “Effects of surface modifications on the peel strength of copper based polymer/metal interfaces with characteristic morphologies”, Journal of Adhesion, 40, 139–150, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim, J-K., Lebbai, M., Liu, J.H., Kim, J.H., Yuen, M., “Interface adhesion between copper lead frame and epoxy molding compound: effects of surface finish, oxidation and dimples”, 50th Electronic Components and Technology Conference, Las Vegas, NV, pp. 601–608, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chun, D.S., Doane, D.A., “Reduction of popcorning in BGA’s by plasma cleaning”, 2nd Pan Pacific Microelectronics Symposium, Kona, Hawaii, January 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kim, S. “The role of plastic package adhesion in performance”, IEEE Transactions on Components, Hybrids, and Manufacturing Technology, 14(4), 809–817, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Thompson, T., Kohn, R., “Implementation of cost effective, level 1, delamination and crack-free solutions for QFP’s”, Proceedings of 1996 International Electronics Packaging Conference, IEPS, Austin, TX, USA, September 1996, pp. 468–474, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hagen, D., Downey, S., Hughes, C., Fowkes, G., Lim, M.L., Anuar, K., Ibrahim, R., “JEDEC level 1 moisture performance solution for 20 × 20 × 1.4 mm TQFPs,” Proceedings of 1996 International Electronics Packaging Conference, IEPS, Austin, TX, USA, September 1996, pp. 102–111, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tada, K., Fujioka, H., “Properties of molding compounds to improve package reliability of SMD’s”, IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies, 22(4), 534–540, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gallo, A., Tubbs, T.R., “High solder-reflow crack resistant molding compound”, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology – Part A, 18(3), 646–649, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee, H., Earmme, Y.Y., “A fracture mechanics analysis of the effects of material properties and geometries of components on various types of package cracks”, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology – Part A, 19(2), 168–178, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tay, A.A.O., Tan, G.L., Lim, T.B., “Predicting delamination in plastic IC packages and determining suitable mold compound properties”, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology – Part B, 17(2), 201–208, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen, A.S., Schaefer, W.J., Lo, R.H.Y.,. Weiler, P., “A study of the interactions of molding compound and die attach adhesive with regards to package cracking”, IEEE Electronic Components Technology Conference, Denver, Colorado, p. 115, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mosbarger, R.D., Hickey, D.J., “The effects of materials and post-mold profiles on plastic encapsulated integrated circuits”, IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium, San Jose, CA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sauber, J., Lee, L., Hsu, S., Hongsmatip, T., “Fracture properties of molding compound materials for IC plastic packaging”, IEEE Transactions on Components, Hybrids, and Manufacturing Technology – Part A, 17(4), 533–541, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Fan, X.J., Zhou, J., Zhang, G.Q., “Multi-physics modeling in virtual prototyping of electronic packages – combined thermal, thermo-mechanical and vapor pressure modeling”, Microelectronics Reliability, 44, 1967–1976, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Takano, E., Mino, T., Takahashi, K., Sawada, K., Shimizu, S., Yoo, H.Y. “The oxidation control of copper lead frame package for prevention of popcorn cracking”, IEEE 47th Electronic Components and Technology Conference, San Jose, CA, pp. 78–83, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Minjin, K., Kim, M., Shin, D., Lim, I., Moon, M., Park, Y., “The effect of filler on the properties of molding compounds and their moldability”, IEEE Electronic Components and Technology Conference, San Jose, CA, pp. 108–113, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Moon, K.S., Hwang, S.D., Yoon, H.G., Ryu, J.H., Woo, S.S., “High filler loading technique and its effects on the reliability of molding compound”, 1998 IEEE/CPMT Electronics Packaging Technology Conference, Singapore, pp. 318–324, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This chapter was written based on work performed by Joseph Fauty, retired – ON Semiconductor plus Michal Stana, formerly of ON Semiconductor – Czech Republic, and Dr. Leonrina Cada, currently with Intel Technology Philippines, Inc. Dr. Cada also holds the position of an associate professor in the University of the Philippines-Diliman, teaching graduate courses on polymer science, materials degradation, and liquid crystals chemistry.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J.K. Fauty .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fauty, J. (2010). Moisture Sensitivity Level (MSL) Capability of Plastic-Encapsulated Packages. In: Fan, X., Suhir, E. (eds) Moisture Sensitivity of Plastic Packages of IC Devices. Micro- and Opto-Electronic Materials, Structures, and Systems. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5719-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5719-1_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5718-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-5719-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics