Designing Higher Education Courses Using Open Educational Resources



Utilising the benefits of web 2 applications allows greater interaction than has previously been possible in online education—between the tutor and students, between the students, and between all participants in the selection of core learning resources. When approached with a positive perspective this enables participants to utilise new ways of constructing knowledge relating to learning activities and then to share these resources with a wider range of people over a longer time frame. It permits structured high-quality educational experiences outwith the normal framework of higher education institutions, yet it enables institutions the flexibility to embed this “disruptive technology” within their own ICT systems. This form of design requires the educationalist to re-think the process of course design in a more flexible format than has previously been common. Part of this flexibility comes from re-using existing educational resources—web pages, journal articles, video and audio clips etc.—rather than being required to re-invent courses on every subject area from the scratch. This chapter describes our experiences of designing different models of higher education courses using open educational resources (OER) and proposes a theoretical framework for the democratisation of education through inter-institutional sharing of the different stages of design and delivery of university courses.


Educational Technology Common Pool Blended Learning Learning Resource Open Educational Resource 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. CoL (Commonwealth of Learning). (2009). Creating learning materials for open and distance learning: A handbook for authors and instructional designers. The Commonwealth of Learning. Retrieved from,
  2. Dean, P., Stahl, M., Sylwester, D., & Pear, J. (2001). Effectiveness of combined delivery modalities for distance learning and resident learning. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 2(3), 247–254.Google Scholar
  3. Edushare. (2009). Project wiki. Retrieved from
  4. Guttikonda, A., & Gutam, S. (2009). Prospects of open access to Indian agricultural research: A case study of ICAR. First Monday, 14(7). Retrieved form,
  5. Mason, R., & Rennie, F. (2006). eLearning: The key concepts. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Mason, R., & Rennie, F. (2007). Using Web 2.0 for learning in the community. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 196–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. OECD. (2007). Giving knowledge for free: The emergence of open educational resources. Retrieved Centre for Educational Research and Innovation from,,3343,en_2649_201185_38659497_1_1_1_1,00.html
  8. OER Handbook for Educators. (2009). Retrieved from
  9. OpenCourseware. (2009). The landing page of the MIT Open Courseware initiative. Retrieved from
  10. OpenLearn. (2009). The Learning space of the UK Open University open courseware initiative. Retrieved from
  11. Rennie, F., & Mason, R. (2007). The development of distributed learning techniques in Bhutan and Nepal. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(1). Retrieved form,
  12. SideCAP (2009) Project wiki. Retrieved from,
  13. Stannard, R. (2008). Teacher training videos. Retrieved form,

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lews Castle CollegeUniversity of the Highlands and Islands Millennium InstituteStornowayScotland
  2. 2.Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK

Personalised recommendations