Abstract
It seems fair to say that in the Neolithic age, every household was involved in food production, but during industrial times, only a very small proportion of households (<10%) were involved in farming and feeding everyone. Food producing went from being the activity of everyone to being a sector of the economy employing few people and at the same time producing a large agricultural surplus that is exported to the rest of the economy. This is often called agricultural development, and the process by which this development has been accomplished is often referred to as intensification. There are two positions on what has happened to the productivity of labor in this developmental process: the rise thesis and the decline thesis.
The original article Labor Productivity and Agricultural Development: Boserup Revisited appeared in Human Ecology, Vol. 28, No. 2, June 2000.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Sawah is annual cropping on flat level valley land, with soil preparation by animal drawn plows and harrows, irrigation, seed beds for rice, and transplanting of the seedlings. The harvest cutting tool is the sickle.
- 2.
Swidden is a long-fallow technique with slashing, felling, and burning, planting by means of dibble stick, many cultivars, extensive hand weeding, and bush knife (or machete), ax, and baskets. The harvest cutting tool may be the finger knife, or the sickle. It is never irrigated, and usually occurs on hilly slopes.
- 3.
A nominal scale may seem peculiar, given our standard notions of the increase in technology over the longue duree. Turner and Doolittle (1978) attempted an ordinal scale of technology, and they claimed to have established an interval scale for cropping frequency. Boserup (1981) also has an ordinal scale for fallow. There is reason to be skeptical on the completeness, and ordinality, of these scales.
Turner and Doolittle’s agro technology scale, leaves out genetic materials, metals, traction sources, and engines (water, wind, as well as electric and heat). They mixed competitor control with fertility. And the weights they assign to the traits are unmotivated, in the sense that I have not been able to imagine the dimension involved. If that dimension is labor, then of course it is conflated with the measure of labor input, and no investigation of the correlation of labor productivity with agricultural intensity will be valid.
Boserup has an ordinal scale for frequency of cropping (the inverse of which is length of fallow.) Just in terms of the years (or days) that a field is without a crop it is a good ordinal scale. But the difference between long-fallow and annual cropping is more than a difference in time, it is also a major change in technology, and it is not clear that the necessary technology changes can be described as an ordinal variable.
- 4.
There is an old tradition in Europe of measuring crop output by volume (the bushel). This tradition was changed to mass (the kilogram) in the nineteenth century on the continent with the widespread adoption of the metric system of weights and measures. In the USA the bushel is still the major reporting unit for output.
- 5.
Both Kunstadter et al. (1978, p. xii) and Moerman (1968, p. 210) state that the tang contains 20 l. Freeman (personal communication) states that he must have been using the Imperial pint for his Iban studies. The Imperial gallon contains 4.546 l (the US gallon contains 3.7583 l). Moerman (1968, p. 210) states that the tang contains approximately 11 kg of rough paddy.
- 6.
All output is a product of factors of production (land, labor, technology for a start), and it is possible to imagine decomposing that output and assigning some fraction of it to land, another fraction to labor, etc. In fact it is possible, under ideal circumstances, to measure the inputs of the factors, and to analyze the output in terms of the factor proportions. Data that permit this are usually available only under highly controlled experimental conditions. What we will have available to us will be total factor inputs, and the total output. The only ratio we can construct with these data is what is called total factor productivity. The labor input is divided by the total output. But as the technology package differs, and so does land form, all of these inputs are conflated in the ratio.
- 7.
Under conditions of stone-age technology it is likely that the difference between swidden and sawah labor productivities would be even larger. We have only a tiny handful of studies of the productivity of stone tools used for cutting woody vegetation (Salisbury 1962; Carneiro 1976; Toth et al. 1992). They are not very persuasive, being crude estimates at best. It is easy to imagine that iron (and steel), are much more effective than stone when it comes to felling a large tropical hardwood tree, but that may be no more than an iron-age bias.
Bibliography
Barker R, Herdt RW, Rose B. 1985. The Rice Economy of Asia. Washington D.C., Resources for the Future.
Barlett PF. 1976. “Labor efficiency and the mechanism of agricultural evolution.” Journal of Anthropological Research 32:124-140.
Bender B. 1975. Farming in prehistory. From hunter-gatherer to food producer. London, John Baker
Boserup E. 1965. The conditions of agricultural growth. Chicago, Aldine
Boserup E. 1981. Population and Technical Change: A Study of Long-Term Trends. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Bray F. The Rice Economies: Technology and Development in Asian Societies. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
Bronson B. 1972. “Farm labor and the evolution of food production.” In Population growth Spooner, B (ed), pp 190-218. Cambridge Mass, The MIT Press
Brookfield HC. 1972. “Intensification and disintensification in Pacific agriculture.” Pacific Viewpoint 13:30-48.
Brookfield HC. 1984. “Intensification revisited.” Pacific Viewpoint 25:15-44.
Brush S, Turner BL II. 1987. “The nature of farming systems and views of their change.” In Comparative Farming Systems. Edited by Turner and Brush, pp 11-48. New York, The Guilford Press.
Buck JL. 1937. Land Utilization in China. Nanking, University of Nanking. Second printing, New York, Paragon Book Reprint Corp.
Campbell D, Stanley J. 1963. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston, Houghton- Mifflin
Carneiro R. 1961. “Slash-and-burn cultivation among the Kuikuru and its implications for cultural development in the Amazon,” in The Evolution of horticultural systems in native North America. Edited by J. Wilbert, pp 47-67. Sociedad de Ciencias Naturales La Salle Caracas, Editorial Sucre
Carneiro R. 1979. “Tree felling with the stone ax: an experiment,” In Experimental Archaeology. Edited by C. Kramer, pp 21-58. New York, Columbia University Press
Clarke WC. 1966. From extensive to intensive cultivation: a succession from New Guinea. Ethnology 5:347-359.
Cohen M. 1977. The food crisis in prehistory. New Haven, Yale University Press
Cohen M. 1989. Health and the rise of civilization. New Haven, Yale University Press.
Conelly WT. 1992. “Agricultural intensification in a Philippine frontier community: Impact on labor efficiency and farm diversity.” Human Ecology 20:203-223.
Conklin HC. 1957. Hanunoo agriculture: A report on an integral system of shifting cultivation in the Philippines. Rome, FAO (Reprinted 1975, Elliot’s Books, Northford Ct.)
Conklin H. 1980. Ethnographic atlas of Ifugao. New Haven, Yale University Press
Couty P. 1991. L’agriculture africaine en reserve. Reflexions sur l’innovation et l’intensification en afrique tropicale. Cahiers d’Etudes Africaines 32:65-81
Dalton G. 1960. A note of clarification on economic surplus. American Anthropologist 62:483-490.
Delvert J. 1961. Le Paysan Cambodgien. Paris, Mouton.
Dove M. 1983. Theories of swidden agriculture, and the political economy of ignorance. Agroforestry Systems 1:85-99
Dumond D. 1961. Swidden agriculture and the rise of Maya civilization. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 17:301-316.
Durrenberger EP. 1978. Agricultural production and household budgets in a Shan peasant village in Northwestern Thailand: A quantitative description. Papers in International Studies, Southeast Asia Studies No. 49. Athens OH, Ohio University, Center for International Studies
Durrenberger EP. 1979. Rice production in a Lisu village. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 10:139-145.
Eder JF. 1977. Agricultural intensification and the returns to labour in the Philippine swidden system. Pacific Viewpoint 18:1-21
Ellen R. 1982. Environment, subsistence and system. The ecology of small-scale social formations. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Freeman D. 1955. Iban agriculture. A report on the shifting cultivation of hill rice by the Iban of Sarawak. Colonial Office, Colonial Research Studies No. 18 London, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office
Geddes WR. 1954. The Land Dayaks of Sarawak. London, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office
Geertz C. 1963. Agricultural involution. Berkeley, University of California Press
Gourou P. 1936. Les paysans du delta Tonkinois. Paris, Les Editions d’Art et d’Histoire
Gourou P. 1956. “The quality of land use of tropical cultivators. In Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Edited by WL Thomas, pp 336-349. Chicago, University of Chicago Press
Grigg D. 1974. The agricultural systems of the world. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Grigg D. 1978. Ester Boserup’s theory of agrarian change: a critical review. Progress in Human Geography 3:64-84
Griliches Z. 1968. Agricultural productivity and technology. International encyclopaedia of the social sciences 1:241-5
Gross DR. 1984. Time allocation: a tool for the study of cultural behavior. Annual review of anthropology 13:519-58
Hanks LR. 1972. Rice and man. Chicago, Aldine
Harris DR. 1972. “Swidden systems and settlement”. In Man settlement and urbanism. Edited by P.J. Ucko, R. Tringham and G.W. Dimbleby, pp. London, Duckworth
Harris M. 1959. The economy has no surplus? American Anthropologist 61:185-200.
Harris M. 1971. Culture, man, and nature. New York, Thomas Y. Crowell Co.
Hayami, Y, Ruttan V. 1986. Agricultural development: An international perspective, 2nd ed. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press
Huke RE. 1982a. Agroclimatic and dry season maps of south, southeast, and east Asia. Los Banos, IRRI
Huke RE. 1982b. Rice area by type of culture: South, Southeast, and East Asia. Los Banos, IRRI
Hunt RC. 1995. “Agrarian data sets: the comparativist’s view”. In The comparative analysis of human societies, Edited by Emilio Moran, pp 173-189. Boulder CO, Lynne Rienner.
Janlekha K. 1955. A study of the economy of a rice growing village in central Thailand. Bangkok, Ministry of Agriculture, Division of Agricultural Economics
Kirch PV. 1994. The wet and the dry: Irrigation and agricultural intensification in Polynesia. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Kunstadter P, Chapman EC, Sabhasri S. 1978. Farmers in the forest: economic development and marginal agriculture in northern Thailand. East-West Center. Honolulu, University Press of Hawaii
Leach ER. 1949. Some aspects of dry rice cultivation in North Burma and Borneo. The advancement of science VI, no 21, p 27
Leach ER. 1961. Pul Eliya. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Levang P. 1993. “Jachere arboree et culture sur brulis dans les iles l’archipel Indonesien”. In La Jachere en Afrique de l’Ouest. Edited by C. Floret et G. Serpantie, pp 179-192. Paris, ORSTOM
Livi-Bacci, M. 1992. A concise history of world population. Cambridge MA, Blackwell’s
Maclachlan M. 1983. And they did not starve: biocultural adaptation in a south Indian village. Philadelphia, ISHI Press
Milleville P, Serpantie G. 1994. Dynamiques agraires et problematique de l’intensification de l’agriculture en Afrique soudano-Sahelienne. Comptes rendu acad agric Francaise 80(8):149-161
Moerman M. 1968. Agricultural change and peasant choice in a Thai village. Berkeley, University of California Press
Naroll R. 1962. Data quality control - a new research technique: prolegomena to a cross-cultural study of culture stress. New York, The Free Press
Netting RMcC. 1977. Cultural ecology. Menlo Park, CA., Cummings.
Netting RMcC. 1993. Smallholders, householders: farm families and the ecology of intensive, sustainable agriculture. Stanford, Stanford University Press.
Orans M. 1966. Surplus. Human Organization 25:24-32
Padoch C. 1985. “Labor efficiency and intensity of land use in rice production: An example from Kalimantan.” Human Ecology 13:271-289.
Pearson H. 1957. “The economy has no surplus. Critique of a theory of Development. In Trade and market in the early empires. Edited by K Polanyi, C Arensberg and H Pearson, pp 320-341. Glencoe, IL, The Free Press
Pryor FL. 1977. The origins of the economy: a comparative study of distribution in primitive and peasant economies. New York, Academic Press
Reid A. 1988. Southeast Asia in the age of commerce 1450-1680: the lands below the winds. New Haven, Yale University Press
Rostow WW. 1960. The stages of economic growth: a non- communist manifesto. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Sahlins MD. 1968b. Tribesmen. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall.
Salisbury R. 1962. From stone to steel: economic consequences of a technological change in New Guinea London, Cambridge University Press
Sanders W, Nichols D. 1988. Ecological theory and cultural evolution in the Valley of Oaxaca. Current Anthropology 29:33-80.
Sevin O. 1982. Les Dayak du centre Kalimantan. Etude geographique du pays Ngaju, de la Seruyan a la Kahayu Travaux et Documents de ORSTOM, no. 163. Paris, ORSTOM
Smith A. 1776. The wealth of nations. 1976 edition. Chicago, University of Chicago Press
Spooner B (ed). 1972. Population growth. Cambridge MASS, The MIT Press
Toth N, Clark D, Ligabue G. 1992. “The last stone ax makers.” Scientific American July 1992, pp 88-93.
Turner BL II, Hanham RO, Portararo AV. 1977. Population pressure and agricultural intensity. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 67(3):384-396.
Turner BL, Doolittle W. 1978. The concept and measure of agricultural intensity. Professional Geographer 30:297-301.
Ucko PJ, Tringham R, Dimbleby GW. (eds). 1972. Man, settlement and urbanism. London, Duckworth
Waddell J. 1972. The mound builders. Seattle, University of Washington Press
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hunt, R.C. (2010). Labor Productivity and Agricultural Development: Testing Boserup. In: Bates, D., Tucker, J. (eds) Human Ecology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5701-6_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5701-6_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5700-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-5701-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)