Skip to main content

Analyzing the Theoretical Performance of Information Sharing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Dynamics of Information Systems

Part of the book series: Springer Optimization and Its Applications ((SOIA,volume 40))

  • 1051 Accesses

Summary

Individuals in large, heterogeneous teams will commonly produce sensor data that is likely useful to some other members of the team, but it is not precisely known to whom the information is useful. Some recent work has shown that randomly propagating the information performed surprisingly well, compared to infeasible optimal approaches. This chapter extends that work by looking at how the relative performance of random information passing algorithms scales with the size of the team. Additionally, the chapter looks at how random information passing performs when sensor data is noisy, so that individuals need multiple pieces of data to reach a conclusion, and the underlying situation is dynamic, so individuals need new information over time. Results show that random information passing is broadly effective, although relative performance is lower in some situations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bourgault, F., Durrant-Whyte, H.: Communication in general decentralized filter and the coordinated search strategy. In: Proc. of FUSION’04 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boyd, S., Ghosh, A., Prabhakar, B., Shah, D.: Randomized gossip algorithms. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 14(SI), 2508–2530 (2006). doi:10.1109/TIT.2006.874516

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Chaimowicz, L., Kumar, V.: Aerial shepherds: Coordination among uavs and swarms of robots. In: 7th International Symposium on Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Drury, J.L., Richer, J., Rackliffe, N., Goodrich, M.A.: Comparing situation awareness for two unmanned aerial vehicle human interface approaches. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Safety, Security and Rescue Robotics (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goldman, C.V., Zilberstein, S.: Optimizing information exchange in cooperative multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Heinzelman, W.R., Kulik, J., Balakrishnan, H.: Adaptive protocols for information dissemination in wireless sensor networks. In: Proc. of MobiCom’99 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kuokka, D., Harada, L.: Matchmaking for information agents. In: Readings in Agents. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kuokka, D., Harada, L.: Matchmaking for information agents. In: Readings in Agents. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Leary, C.C., Schwehm, M., Eichner, M., Duerr, H.P.: Tuning degree distributions: Departing from scale-free networks. Phys. A, Stat. Mech. Appl. 382(2), 731–738 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nair, R., Tambe, M.: Communication for improving policy computation in distributed pomdps. In: Proc. of AAMAS’04 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rosencrantz, M., Gordon, G., Thrun, S.: Decentralized sensor fusion with distributed particle filters. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Uncertainty in AI (UAI) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Roth, M.: Execution-time communication decisions for coordination of multi-agent teams. PhD thesis, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schurr, N., Marecki, J., Tambe, M., Scerri, P., Levis, J., Kasinadhuni, N.: The future of disaster response: Humans working with multiagent teams using DEFACTO. In: AAAI Spring Symposium on Homeland Security (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tambe, M.: Agent architectures for flexible, practical teamwork. In: National Conference on AI (AAAI97), pp. 22–28 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Velagapudi, P., Prokopyev, O., Sycara, K., Scerri, P.: Maintaining shared belief in a large multiagent team. In: Proceedings of FUSION’07 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Velagapudi, P., Prokopyev, O., Sycara, K., Scerri, P.: An analysis of information sharing in large teams. In: Proceedings of AAMAS’09 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Xu, Y., Scerri, P., Yu, B., Okamoto, S., Lewis, M., Sycara, K.: An integrated token-based algorithm for scalable coordination. In: AAMAS’05 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Xuan, P., Lesser, V., Zilberstein, S.: Communication decisions in multi-agent cooperation: Model and experiments. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Autonomous Agents (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Scerri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scerri, P., Velagapudi, P., Sycara, K. (2010). Analyzing the Theoretical Performance of Information Sharing. In: Hirsch, M., Pardalos, P., Murphey, R. (eds) Dynamics of Information Systems. Springer Optimization and Its Applications, vol 40. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5689-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics