Investigating Cortical Descending Control of the Peripheral Auditory System

Conference paper

Abstract

Corticofugal projections may modulate auditory signal processing at all levels of the ascending auditory system. The final link in this pathway, extending descending control to the cochlea, is the olivocochlear bundle, which originates in the olivary complex and consists of lateral and medial (MOC) systems. Classically, activation of the MOC system leads to an increase in cochlear microphonic and a decrease in cochlear action potential amplitudes.

Here, we investigated the effect of reversible cortical inactivation on the guinea pig cochlea. During cortical inactivation, CM and CAP amplitudes were decreased to varying extents. Reactivation of the cortex led to a recovery to control levels. These results indicate that even in the anaesthetized animal, the cortex is exercising control over the function of the cochlea.

Keywords

Descending control Cochlear Potentials 

References

  1. Coomes DL, Schofield BR (2004) Projections from the auditory cortex to the superior olivary complex in guinea pigs. Eur J Neurosci 19:2188–2200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Delano PH, Elgueda D, Hamame CM, Robles L (2007) Selective attention to visual stimuli reduces cochlear sensitivity in chinchillas. J Neurosci 27:4146–4153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fex J (1959) Augmentation of cochlear microphonic by stimulation of efferent fibres to the cochlea; preliminary report. Acta Otolaryngol 50:540–541PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Galambos R (1956) Suppression of auditory nerve activity by stimulation of efferent fibers to cochlea. J Neurophysiol 19:424–437PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Groff JA, Liberman MC (2003) Modulation of cochlear afferent response by the lateral olivocochlear system: activation via electrical stimulation of the inferior colliculus. J Neurophysiol 90:3178–3200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Guinan JJ (1996) Physiology of the oivocochlear efferents. In: Dallos P, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) The cochlea. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 435–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Guinan JJ Jr (2006) Olivocochlear efferents: anatomy, physiology, function, and the measurement of efferent effects in humans. Ear Hear 27:589–607PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lomber SG, Payne BR, Horel JA (1999) The cryoloop: an adaptable reversible cooling deactivation method for behavioral or electrophysiological assessment of neural function. J Neurosci Methods 86:179–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Meurice JC, Paquereau J, Marillaud A (1991) Same location of the source of P1 of BAEPs and N1 of CAP in guinea pig. Hear Res 53:209–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mountain DC (1980) Changes in endolymphatic potential and crossed olivocochlear bundle stimulation alter cochlear mechanics. Science 210:71–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mulders WH, Robertson D (2000) Effects on cochlear responses of activation of descending pathways from the inferior colliculus. Hear Res 149:11–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mulders WH, Robertson D (2006) Gentamicin abolishes all cochlear effects of electrical stimulation of the inferior colliculus. Exp Brain Res 174:35–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Oatman LC (1971) Role of visual attention on auditory evoked potentials in unanesthetized cats. Exp Neurol 32:341–356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Oatman LC (1976) Effects of visual attention on the intensity of auditory evoked potentials. Exp Neurol 51:41–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Winer JA (2005) Decoding the auditory corticofugal systems. Hear Res 207:1–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Winer JA, Lee CC (2007) The distributed auditory cortex. Hear Res 229:3–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Xiao Z, Suga N (2002) Modulation of cochlear hair cells by the auditory cortex in the mustached bat. Nat Neurosci 5:57–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.MRC Institute of Hearing ResearchNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations