Skip to main content

The Implicit Learning of Noise: Behavioral Data and Computational Models

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Neurophysiological Bases of Auditory Perception

Abstract

A prerequisite for the recognition of natural sounds is that an auditory signature of the sources should be learnt through experience. Here, we used random waveforms to investigate whether implicit learning occurs with repeated exposure. Listeners were asked to discriminate between 1-s samples of running noise and two seamlessly repeated 0.5-s samples of noise (repeated noise; RN). Unbeknownst to them, one particular exemplar of repeated noise was presented in several trials inter­spersed in a block (reference repeated noise; RefRN). A first experiment showed that RefRN was discriminated more efficiently than RN, even though listeners did not know that memorizing noise samples across trials could be beneficial, nor which trials should be memorized. Most of the learning occurred rapidly within ten presentations. A second experiment confirmed that the effect was a genuine increase in sensitivity. Preliminary investigations of computational models of cochlear and cortical activity failed to distinguish noises that produced large learning effects, so it is unclear which noise aspects were learnt. The findings show neural learning mechanisms of acoustic information that are unsupervised, resilient to interference, and fast-acting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Chi T, Ru P, Shamma SA (2005) Multiresolution spectrotemporal analysis of complex sounds. J Acoust Soc Am 118(2):887–906

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Demany L, Semal C (2008) The role of memory in auditory perception. In: Yost WA, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) Auditory perception of sound sources. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz JB, Elhilali M, David SV et al (2007) Does attention play a role in dynamic receptive field adaptation to changing acoustic salience in A1? Hear Res 229(1-2):186–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goossens T, van de Par S, Kohlrausch A (2008) On the ability to discriminate Gaussian-noise tokens or random tone-burst complexes. J Acoust Soc Am 124(4):2251–2262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gorea A, Sagi D (2000) Failure to handle more than one internal representation in visual detection tasks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97(22):12380–12384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guttman N, Julesz B (1963) Lower limits of auditory analysis. J Acous Soc Am 35(4):610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanna TE (1984) Discrimination of reproducible noise as a function of bandwidth and duration. Percept Psychophys 36(5):409–416

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaernbach C (2004) The memory of noise. Exp Psychol 51(4):240–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Limbert C (1984) The perception of repeated noise. Dissertation, Cambridge University

    Google Scholar 

  • Masquelier T, Guyonneau R, Thorpe SJ (2008) Spike timing dependent plasticity finds the start of repeating patterns in continuous spike trains. PLoS Comput Biol 1:e1377

    Google Scholar 

  • Motulsky H, Christopoulos A (2004) Fitting models to biological data using linear and nonlinear regression. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfafflin SM (1968) Detection of auditory signal in restricted sets of reproducible noise. J Acoust Soc Am 43(3):487–490

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Warren RM, Bashford JA Jr, Cooley JM et al (2001) Detection of acoustic repetition for very long stochastic patterns. Percept Psychophys 63(1):175–182

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wright BA, Saberi K (1999) Strategies used to detect auditory signals in small sets of random maskers. J Acoust Soc Am 105(3):1765–1775

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grant ANR-06-NEUR-O22-01. We thank Timothée Masquelier for sharing pilot data using a similar paradigm (Masquelier & Thorpe, unpublished observations).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Pressnitzer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this paper

Cite this paper

Agus, T.R., Beauvais, M., Thorpe, S.J., Pressnitzer, D. (2010). The Implicit Learning of Noise: Behavioral Data and Computational Models. In: Lopez-Poveda, E., Palmer, A., Meddis, R. (eds) The Neurophysiological Bases of Auditory Perception. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5686-6_52

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics