Skip to main content

Effects of Peripheral Tuning on the Auditory Nerve’s Representation of Speech Envelope and Temporal Fine Structure Cues

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Neurophysiological Bases of Auditory Perception

Abstract

A number of studies have explored how speech envelope and temporal fine structure (TFS) cues contribute to speech perception. Some recent investigations have attempted to process speech signals to remove envelope cues and leave only TFS cues, but the results are confounded by the fact that envelope cues may be partially reconstructed when TFS signals pass through the narrowband filters of the cochlea. To minimize this reconstruction, investigators have utilized large numbers of narrowband filters in their speech processing algorithms and introduced competing envelope cues. However, it has been argued that human peripheral tuning may be two or more times sharper than previously estimated, such that envelope restoration may be stronger than originally thought. In this study, we utilize a computational model of the auditory periphery to investigate how cochlear tuning affects the restoration of envelope cues in auditory nerve responses to “TFS speech.” Both the envelope-normalization algorithm of Lorenzi et al. (Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:18866−18869, 2006) and the speech-noise chimaeras of Smith et al. (Nature 416:87-90, 2002) were evaluated. The results for the two processing algorithms indicate that the competing noise envelope of the chimaeras better reduces speech envelope restoration but does not totally eliminate it. Moreover, envelope restoration is greater if the cochlear tuning is adjusted to match Shera and colleagues’ (Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:3318−3323, 2002) estimates of human tuning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bruce IC, Zilany MSA (2007) Modeling the effects of cochlear impairment on the neural representation of speech in the auditory nerve and primary auditory cortex. Auditory signal processing in hearing-impaired listeners, International Symposium on Audiological and Auditory Research (ISAAR), Denmark,1-10, August 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Elhilali M, Chi T, Shamma SA (2003) A spectro-temporal modulation index (STMI) for assessment of speech intelligibility. Speech Commun 41:331–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasberg BR, Moore BCJ (1990) Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hear Res 47:103–138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heinz MG, Swaminathan J (2008) Neural cross-correlation metrics to quantify envelope and fine-structure coding in auditory-nerve responses. J Acoust Soc Am 123:3056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzi C, Gilbert G, Carn H, Garnier S, Moore BCJ (2006) Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:18866–18869

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Recio A, Rhode WS, Kiefte M, Kluender KR (2002) Responses to cochlear normalized speech stimuli in the auditory nerve of cat. J Acoust Soc Am 111:2213–2218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shera CA, Guinan JJ Jr, Oxenham AJ (2002) Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:3318–3323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith ZM, Oxenham AJ, Delgutte B (2002) Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception. Nature 416:87–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Young ED (2008) Neural representation of spectral and temporal information in speech. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 363:923–945

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng FG, Nie KB, Liu S, Stickney G, Del Rio E, Kong YY, Chen HB (2004) On the dichotomy in auditory perception between temporal envelope and fine structure cues. J Acoust Soc Am 116:1351–1354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zilany MSA, Bruce IC (2006) Modeling auditory-nerve responses for high sound pressure levels in the normal and impaired auditory periphery. J Acoust Soc Am 120:1446–1466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zilany MSA, Bruce IC (2007a) Representation of the vowel /ε/ in normal and impaired auditory-nerve fibers: model predictions of responses in cats. J Acoust Soc Am 122:402–417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zilany MSA and Bruce IC (2007b) Predictions of speech intelligibility with a model of the normal and impaired auditory-periphery. Proceedings of the 3rd International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering, NJ, May 2007, pp 481–485

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Zach Smith for providing speech intelligibility data. This work was funded by NSERC Discovery Grant 261736.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian C. Bruce .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ibrahim, R.A., Bruce, I.C. (2010). Effects of Peripheral Tuning on the Auditory Nerve’s Representation of Speech Envelope and Temporal Fine Structure Cues. In: Lopez-Poveda, E., Palmer, A., Meddis, R. (eds) The Neurophysiological Bases of Auditory Perception. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5686-6_40

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics