Representation of Intelligible and Distorted Speech in Human Auditory Cortex

Conference paper


The aim of the study is to identify cortical regions that process the meaning of spoken language, irrespective of acoustical realization, by means of functional MRI. Distorted speech material is used along with clean speech to allow for a controlled manipulation of intelligibility, depending on the presentation order. Speech distortion was performed by rotating spectral features. Psychophysical experiments were performed with 230 sentences of a speech intelligibility test in German language, to explore the effect of presentation order of clean and distorted speech. Results from 15 listeners indicate that distorted signals can reliably be presented either in a way well to understand, or completely unintelligible, depending on the exact presentation relative to the other speech material. The results were used to design a functional MRI experiment that allowed us to image brain activation for identical acoustic stimuli, only differing in their intelligibility. The fMRI data indicate that speech stimuli in general cause bilateral activation in the temporal lobes. The contrast between natural and distorted speech only comes up in regions beyond primary auditory areas, mainly in superior temporal gyrus. The contrast between acoustically identical stimuli only differing in their intelligibility reveals several areas, largely in the left hemisphere and clearly separate from the temporal lobes. These regions are interpreted to represent the processing of the meaning of intelligible speech, irrespective of their exact acoustical properties.


Speech intelligibility Language Auditory cortex fMRI 



The authors are grateful for the support of Birger Kollmeier and the Medical Physics group in Oldenburg. This work was funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Up 10/2-2).


  1. Baumgart F, Kaulisch T, Tempelmann C, Gaschler-Markefski B, Tegeler C, Schindler F, Stiller D, Scheich H (1998) Electrodynamic headphones and woofers for application in magnetic resonance imaging scanners. Med Phys 25:2068–2070PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blesser B (1972) Speech perception under conditions of spectral transformation: I. phonetic characteristics. J Speech Hear Res 15:5–41PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Byrne D, Dillon H, Tran K, Arlinger S, Wilbraham K et al (1994) An international comparison of long-term average speech spectra. J Acoust Soc Am 96:2108–2120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Davis MH, Johnsrude IS (2003) Hierarchical processing in spoken language comprehension. J Neurosci 23(8):3423–3431PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Davis MH, Johnsrude IS (2007) Hearing speech sounds: top-down influences on the interface between audition and speech perception. Hear Res 229(1-2):132–147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davis MH, Johnsrude IS, Hervais-Adelman A, Taylor K, McGettigan C (2005) Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences. J Exp Psychol Gen 134(2):222–241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hall DA, Haggard MP, Akeroyd MA, Palmer AR, Summerfield AQ, Elliott MR, Gurney EM, Bowtell RW (1999) “Sparse” temporal sampling in auditory fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp 7(3):213–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hervais-Adelman A, Davis MH, Johnsrude IS, Carlyon RP (2008) Perceptual learning of noise vocoded words: effects of feedback and lexicality. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform 34(2):460–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hickok G, Poeppel D (2007) The cortical organization of speech processing. Nat Rev Neurosci 8(5):393–402PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kollmeier B, Wesselkamp M (1997) Development and evaluation of a german sentence test for objective and subjective speech intelligibility assessment. J Acoust Soc Am 102(4):2412–2421PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Narain C, Scott SK, Wise RJS, Rosen S, Le A, Iversen SD, Matthews PM (2003) Dening a left-lateralized response specific to intelligible speech using fMRI. Cereb Cortex 13(12):1362–1368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Oldeld RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9(1):97–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Remez RE, Rubin PE, Pisoni DB, Carrell TD (1981) Speech perception without traditional speech cues. Science 212(4497):947–949PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Scott SK, Wise RJS (2004) The functional neuroanatomy of prelexical processing in speech perception. Cognition 92(1-2):13–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Scott SK, Blank CC, Rosen S, Wise RJS (2000) Identification of a pathway for intelligible speech in the left temporal lobe. Brain 123(Pt 12):2400–2406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Uppenkamp S, Johnsrude IS, Norris D, Marslen-Wilson W, Patterson RD (2006) Locating the initial stages of speech-sound processing in human temporal cortex. Neuroimage 31(3):1284–1296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Medizinische PhysikUniversität OldenburgOldenburgGermany

Personalised recommendations