Skip to main content

Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Cortical Responses to a New Dichotic Pitch Stimulus

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1300 Accesses

Abstract

This study used behavioural measures and magnetoencephalography (MEG) to explore a binaural pitch, which is perceived when dichotic frequency modulation (FM) is applied to a band-limited noise stimulus. Although the stimulus contains no spectral, temporal or binaural components expected to produce a pitch, listeners were able to consistently match it to a pure tone. The MEG measures explored spatiotemporal characteristics of the cortical response evoked by the onset of this pitch within a noise. This had a latency of approximately 170 ms and was located in auditory cortex posterior to Heschl’s gyrus. In terms of spectral content, pitch onset was associated with a burst of activity in the theta and alpha frequency bands. Listeners’ ability to perceptually match the stimulus to a pure tone, and the similarity of the evoked response to previously described pitch-onset responses suggest that it does elicit a true pitch.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adjamian P, Barnes GR, Hillebrand A et al (2004) Co-registration of magnetoencephalography with magnetic resonance imaging using bite-bar-based fiducials and surface-matching. Clin Neurophysiol 115:691–698

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Adjamian P et al (2009) Effective electromagnetic noise cancellation with beamformers and synthetic gradiometry in shielded and partly shielded environments. J Neurosci Methods. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.12.006

  • Brookes MJ, Stevenson CM, Barnes GR et al (2007) Beamformer reconstruction of correlated sources using a modified source model. Neuroimage 34:1454–1465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chait M, Poeppel D, Simon JZ (2006) Neural response correlates of detection of monaurally and binaurally created pitches in humans. Cereb Cortex 16:835–848

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheyne D, Bostan AC, Gaetz W, Pang EW (2007) Event-related beamforming: a robust method for presurgical functional mapping using MEG. Clin Neurophysiol 118:1691–1704

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer EM, Huggins WH (1958) Creation of pitch through binaural interaction. J Acoust Soc Am 30:413–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman S (1948) Frequency analysis, modulation and noise. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gootjes L, Bouma A, van Strien JW et al (2006) Attention modulates hemispheric differences in functional connectivity: evidence from MEG recordings. Neuroimage 30(1):245–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hadjipapas A, Hillebrand A, Holliday IE et al (2005) Assessing interactions of linear and nonlinear neuronal sources using MEG beamformers: a proof of concept. Clin Neurophysiol 116:1300–1313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hall DA, Plack CJ (2008) Pitch processing sites in the human auditory brain. Cereb Cortex 19(3):576-585. doi:10.1093/cerecor/bhn108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann WM, McMillon CD (2001) Binaural coherence edge pitch. J Acoust Soc Am 109:294–303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henning GB (1966) Frequency discrimination of random amplitude tones. J Acoust Soc Am 39:336–339

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herdman AT, Wollbrink A, Chau W, Ishii R, Ross B, Pantev C (2003) Determination of activation areas in the human auditory cortex by means of synthetic aperture magnetometry. Neuroimage 20:995–1005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hertrich I, Mathiak K, Menning H et al (2005) MEG responses to rippled noise and Huggins pitch reveal similar cortical representations. Neuroreport 16:193–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hillebrand A, Singh KD, Holliday IE et al (2005) A new approach to neuroimaging with magnetoencephalography. Hum Brain Mapp 25:199–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klein MA, Hartmann WM (1981) Binaural edge pitch. J Acoust Soc Am 70:51–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krumbholz K, Patterson R, Seither-Preisler A et al (2003) Neuromagneteic evidence for a pitch-processing center in Heschl’s gyrus. Cereb Cortex 13:765–772

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lütkenhöner B, Steinsträter O (1998) High-precision neuromagnetic study of the functional organisation of the human auditory cortex. Audiol Neurootol 3(2-3):191–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ritsma RJ (1962) Existence region of the tonal residue. J Acoust Soc Am 34:1224–1229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts B, Brunstrom JM (2001) Perceptual fusion and fragmentation of complex tones made inharmonic by applying different degrees of frequency shift and spectral stretch. J Acoust Soc Am 110:2479–2490

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson SE, Vrba J (1999) Functional neuroimaging by synthetic aperture magnetometry (SAM). In: Yoshimoto T, Kotani M, Kuriki S, Karibe H, Nakasato N (eds) Recent advances in biomagnetism. Tohoku University Press, Sendai, pp 302–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Schouten JF, Ritsma RJ, Lopes Cardozo B (1962) Pitch of the residue. J Acoust Soc Am 34:1418–1424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witton C, Green GGR, Henning GB (2005) Binaural ‘sluggishness’ as a function of stimulus bandwidth. In: Pressnitzer D, de Cheveigné A, McAdams S et al (eds) Auditory signal processing: physiology, psychophysics, and models. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwicker E (1962) Direct comparison between the sensations produced by frequency modulation and amplitude modulation. J Acoust Soc Am 34:1425–1430

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caroline Witton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this paper

Cite this paper

Witton, C., Hillebrand, A., Henning, G.B. (2010). Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Cortical Responses to a New Dichotic Pitch Stimulus. In: Lopez-Poveda, E., Palmer, A., Meddis, R. (eds) The Neurophysiological Bases of Auditory Perception. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5686-6_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics