Model6: Combination of Both Abilities

  • Luciano L’Abate
  • Mario Cusinato
  • Eleonora Maino
  • Walter Colesso
  • Claudia Scilletta
Chapter

Abstract

The existence of both basic dimensions, distance or the ability to love spatially and control or the ability to regulate oneself temporally, is fundamental to understanding all the other forthcoming models of relational competence theory (RCT). How we approach or avoid another individual, activity, object, or task and how fast or how slowly this process takes place have important implications for the development and growth of intimate relationships.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Ariel, S. (2002). Children’s imaginative play. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  3. Bakan, D. (1968). Disease, pain, and sacrifice: Toward a psychology of suffering. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  4. Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (Eds.). (2004). Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  5. Depue, R. A., & Lenzenweger, M. F. (2006). A multidimensional neurobehavioral model of personality disturbance. In R. F. Krueger & J. L. Tackett (Eds.), Personality and psychopathology (pp. 210–261). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  6. Harkness, A. R. (2007). Personality traits are essential for a complete clinical science. In S. O. Lilienfeld & W. T. O’Donohue (Eds.), The great ideas of clinical science: 17 principles that every mental health professional should understand (pp. 263–290). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Horowitz, L. M. (2004). Interpersonal foundations of psychopathology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jordan, J. (2004). Personality disorder or relational disconnection? In Handbook of personality disorders: Theory and practice (pp. 120–134). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Jung Suh, E., Moskowitz, D. S., Fournier, M. A., & Zuroff, D. C. (2004). Gender and relationships: Influences on agentic and communal behaviors. Personal Relationships, 11, 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. King, A., & Terrance, C. (2006). Relationships between personality disorder attributes and friendship qualities among college students. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23(1), 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. L’Abate, L. (1994a). A theory of personality development. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. L’Abate, L. (1994b). What is developmental family psychology? In L. L’Abate (Ed.), Handbook of developmental family psychology and psychopathology (pp. 3–23). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. L’Abate, L. (1997a). Distance writing and computer-assisted training. In R. S. Sauber (Ed.), Managed mental health care: Major diagnostic and treatment approaches (pp. 133–163). Bristol, PA: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  14. L’Abate, L. (1997b). The self in the family: Toward a classification of personality, criminality, and psychopathology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. L’Abate, L. (2005). Personality in intimate relationships: Socialization and psychopathology. New York: Springer Science.Google Scholar
  16. L’Abate, L. (in press-a). A bibliography of secondary sources related to models of relational competence theory. In M. Capitelli, P. De Giacomo, L. L’Abate, & S. Longo (Eds.), Science, mind, and creativity. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. L’Abate, L. (in press-b). Hurt feelings: Theory, research, and applications in intimate relationships. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. L’Abate, L. (in press-c). Paradigms, theories, and models: Two hierarchical frameworks. In L. L’Abate, M. Capitelli, P. De Giacomo, & S. Longo (Eds.), Science, mind, and creativity: The Bari Symposium. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald.Google Scholar
  20. Lenzenweger, M. F. (2006). The longitudinal study of personality disorders: History, design, and initial findings [Special essay]. Journal of Personality Disorders, 6, 645–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McHugh, P. R., & Slavney, P. R. (1989). The perspectives of psychiatry. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  23. Mills, J., Clark, M. S., Ford, T. E., & Johnson, M. (2004). Measurement of communal strength. Personal Relationships, 11, 213–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Olson, D. H. (2000). Circumplex model of marital and family systems. Journal of Family Therapy, 22, 144–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Patrick, C. J., & Bernat, E. M. (2006). The construct of emotions as a bridge between personality and psychopathology. In R. F. Krueger & J. L. Tackett (Eds.), Personality and psychopathology (pp. 174–209). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luciano L’Abate
    • 1
  • Mario Cusinato
    • 2
  • Eleonora Maino
    • 3
  • Walter Colesso
    • 2
  • Claudia Scilletta
    • 4
  1. 1.Georgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.University of PaduaPaduaItaly
  3. 3.Scientific Institute Eugenio MedeaBosisio PariniItaly
  4. 4.MilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations