Abstract
In discussing distributed cognition as a foundation for research on human–computer interaction, Hollan and colleagues note how digital objects or artifacts (e.g. electronic texts) can maintain histories of interaction. Histories-of-use can be based on users’ explicit actions (e.g. annotating or highlighting) or implicit actions (e.g. time spent reading). These actions can then be processed and used to support indirect social interaction. For instance, the digital object could be augmented with information about how it had been used by others. This creates history-enriched digital objects, or what may be called stigmergic artifacts. These artifacts change to reflect the community’s developing consensus and the actions of future users’ are in turn affected by that emerging consensus. This positive feedback loop leads to the development of a stable consensus, which eventually emerges as a by-product of individual use of the artifact. The history can also be mined for the purpose of gaining a perspective on how the community of users interacted with the artifact over time. When the users are students, this type of data mining may provide an instructor with valuable insights. We designed CoREAD, a software application, to capture readers’ text highlighting and to use participant highlighting to modify the text for subsequent users. The text is modified by adding typographical text signals (CoREAD signals by using colour, whereas authors typically signal text by employing bold and italics). This software maintains a history of users’ highlighting actions at the word level resulting in very large data sets (e.g. 100,000 unique entries for 40 users reading a 2,500-word text). A study of 40 undergraduate students using CoREAD was conducted. The quality of the students’ highlights and their written summaries was determined by comparing these “documents” with the original text and a model summary using Latent Semantic Analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
- 2.
Simultaneous, or synchronous, interaction is the norm in natural systems like ant colonies. However, sequenced, or asynchronous, interaction is also possible.
- 3.
Though this can be minimised with good search tools.
- 4.
Since most social software supports multiple functions, bookmarking and tagging might be better considered key functions of many social software systems.
- 5.
Any digital object, such as photographs and videos, may also be bookmarked and tagged.
- 6.
For a copy of the text please contact the first author.
References
Bateman, S., Brooks, C., McCalla, G., & Brusilovsky, P. (2007). Applying collaborative tagging to e-learning. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Tagging and Metadata for Social Information Organization (16th International World Wide Web Conference).
Bonabeau, E. (2002). Agent-based modelling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(3), 7280–7287.
Bonabeau, E., Dorigo, M., & Theraulaz, G. (1999). Swarm intelligence: From natural to artificial systems. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bonabeau, E., & Theraulaz, G. (2000, March). Swarm smarts. Scientific American, 282, 72–79.
Brooks, C., Hansen, C., & Greer, J. (2006). Social awareness in the iHelp courses learning content management system. Paper presented at the Workshop on the Social Navigation and Community based Adaptation Technologies.
Brown, A. L., & Day, J. D. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Behavior, 22, 1–14.
Chiarella, A. F., & Lajoie, S. P. (2006). Enabling the collective to assist the individual: CoREAD, a self-organising reading environment. In T. C. Reeves & S. F. Yamashita (Eds.), Proceedings of the World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (E-Learn) (pp. 2753–2757). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Chiarella, A. F., & Lajoie, S. P. (2009, April). Dynamically modifying text signals: A self-organising systems approach to collaboration. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), San Diego, CA, USA.
Clark, A. (2001). Reasons, robots and the extended mind. Mind and Language, 16(2), 121–145.
Clark, A. (2003). Natural-born cyborgs: Minds, technologies, and the future of human intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press.
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. J. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58, 10–23.
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In R. Glaser & L. B. Resnick (Eds.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Dron, J. (2007a). Designing the undesignable: Social software and control. Educational Technology & Society, 10(3), 60–71.
Dron, J. (2007b). The teacher, the learner and the collective mind. AI & Society, 21(1), 200–216.
Dron, J., & Anderson, T. (2007). Collectives, networks and groups in social software for e-learning. In G. Richards (Ed.), Proceedings of the World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2007. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Dron, J., Boyne, C., & Mitchell, R. (2001). Footpaths in the stuff swamp. Paper presented at the WebNet 2001, Orlando, FL, USA.
Dron, J., Boyne, C., Mitchell, R., & Siviter, P. (2000). CoFIND: Steps towards a self-organising learning environment. Paper presented at the WebNet 2000. San Antonio, TX, USA.
Farzan, R., & Brusilovsky, P. (2005, July). Social navigation support through annotation-based group modeling. Paper presented at the International Conference on User Modeling (UM 2005), Edinburgh, UK.
Farzan, R., & Brusilovsky, P. (2006). AnnotatEd: A social navigation and annotation service for web-based educational resources. In T. C. Reeves & S. F. Yamashita (Eds.), The World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (E-Learn) (pp. 2794–2802). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Foltz, P. W., Laham, D., & Landauer, T. K. (1999). The intelligent essay assessor: Applications to educational technology. Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer-Enhance Learning, 1(2), Retrieved December 6, 2008, from http://imej.wfu.edu/articles/1999/2002/2004/index.asp.
Goldstone, R. L., & Janssen, M. A. (2005). Computational models of collective behavior. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(9), 424–430.
Grasse, P.-P. (1959). La reconstruction du nid et les coordinations interindividuelles chez Bellicositermes natalensis et Cubitermes sp. la theorie de la stigmergie: Essai d’interpretation du comportement des termites constructeurs. Insectes Sociaux, 6(1), 41–80.
Hill, W., & Hollan, J. (1993). History-enriched digital objects. Paper presented at the Third Conference on Computers, Freedom, and Privacy, Burlingame, CA.
Hill, W., Hollan, J., Wroblewski, D., & McCandless, T. (1992). Edit wear and read wear. In CHI ’92: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3–9). Monterey, CA: ACM Press.
Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Kirsh, D. (2000). Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(2), 174–196.
Holland, O., & Melhuish, C. (1999). Stimergy, self-organization, and sorting in collective robotics. Artificial Life, 5(2), 173–202.
Kintsch, E. (1990). Macroprocesses and microprocesses in the development of summarization skill. Cognition and Instruction, 7(3), 161–195.
Koper, R. (2004). Use of the Semantic Web to solve some basic problems in education. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1–23 (PDF version available online at http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/2004/2006).
Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998). An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25(2&3), 259–284.
Landauer, T. K., McNamara, D. S., Dennis, S., & Kintsch, W. (2007). Handbook of latent semantic analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lemarie, J., Lorch, R. F., Jr., Eyrolle, H., & Virbel, J. (2008). SARA: A text-based and reader-based theory of signaling. Educational Psychologist, 43(1), 27–48.
Lorch, R. F., Jr. (1989). Text-signaling devices and their effects on reading and memory processes. Educational Psychology Review, 1(3), 209–234.
Lorch, R. F., Jr., & Lorch, E. P. (1996). Effects of organizational signals on free recall of expository text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 38–48.
Lorch, R. F., Jr., Lorch, E. P., & Klusewitz, M. (1995). Effects of typographical cues on reading and recall of text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 51–64.
Lorch, R. F., Jr., Lorch, E. P., Ritchey, K., McGovern, L., & Coleman, D. (2001). Effects of headings on text summarization. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 171–191.
Marsh, L., & Onof, C. (2008). Stigmergic epistemology, stigmergic cognition. Cognitive Systems Research, 9, 136–149.
Marshall, C. C. (1998). Toward an ecology of hypertext annotation. In Proceedings of Hypertext (pp. 40–49). New York: ACM Press.
Marshall, C. C. (2005). Reading and interactivity in the digital library: Creating an experience that transcends paper. In D. Marcum & G. George (Eds.), Digital library development: The view from Kanazawa (pp. 124–145). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
Marshall, C. C., & Brush, B. A. J. (2004). Exploring the relationship between personal and public annotations. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (pp. 349–357). New York: ACM Press.
Mautone, P. D., & Mayer, R. E. (2001). Signaling as a cognitive guide in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 377–389.
Meyer, B. J. F., & Poon, L. W. (2001). Effects of structure strategy training and signaling on recall of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 141–159.
Miller, J. H., & Page, S. E. (2007). Complex adaptive systems: An introduction to computational models of social life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Myers, D. G. (1995). Psychology 5th edition. New York: Worth Publishers.
Naumann, J., Richter, T., Flender, J., Christmann, U., & Groeben, N. (2007). Signaling in expository hypertexts compensates for deficitis in reading skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 791–807.
Neisser, U. (1997). Rising scores on intelligence tests. American Scientist, 85(5), 440–447.
Recker, M. M., Walker, A., & Lawless, K. (2003). What do you recommend? Implementation and analyses of collaborative information filtering of web resources for education. Instructional Science, 31(4–5), 299–316.
Sulis, W. (1997). Fundamental concepts of collective intelligence. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 1(1), 35–53.
Tattersall, C., Manderveld, J., van den Berg, B., van Es, R., Janssen, J., & Koper, R. (2005). Self organising wayfinding support for lifelong learners. Education and Information Technologies, 10(1–2), 109–121.
Vassileva, J., Greer, J., McCalla, G., Deters, R., Zapata, D., Mudgal, C., et al. (1999). A multi-agent approach to the design of peer-help environments. Proceedings of AIED’99, 38–45.
Acknowledgment
This work was conducted as part of the first author’s doctoral research. It was funded in part by grants awarded to the second author, namely the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada INE Fund and the James McGill Research Fund.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chiarella, A.F., Lajoie, S.P. (2010). A Self-Organising Systems Approach to History-Enriched Digital Objects. In: Ifenthaler, D., Pirnay-Dummer, P., Seel, N. (eds) Computer-Based Diagnostics and Systematic Analysis of Knowledge. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5662-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5662-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5661-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-5662-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)