Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Design Research in Information Systems pp 9–22Cite as

Design Science Research in Information Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Integrated Series in Information Systems ((ISIS,volume 22))

Abstract

Design activities are central to most applied disciplines. Research in design has a long history in many fields including architecture, engineering, education, psychology, and the fine arts (Cross 2001). The computing and information technology (CIT) field since its advent in the late 1940s has appropriated many of the ideas, concepts, and methods of design science that have originated in these other disciplines. However, information systems (IS) as composed of inherently mutable and adaptable hardware, software, and human interfaces provide many unique and challenging design problems that call for new and creative ideas.

Good design is a renaissance attitude that combines technology, cognitive science, human need, and beauty to produce something that the world didn’t know it was missing.

– Paola Antonelli

Design is where science and art break even.

– Robin Mathew

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Benbasat, I. and R. Zmud (1999) Empirical research in information systems: the question of relevance, MIS Quarterly 23 (1), pp. 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benbasat, I. and R. Zmud (2003) The identity crisis within the IS discipline: defining and communicating the discipline’s core properties, MIS Quarterly 27 (2), pp. 183–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, F., Jr. (1987) No silver bullet: essence and accidents of software engineering, IEEE Computer 20 (4), pp. 10–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, R., S. Purao, M. Rossi, and M. Sein (2005), Being proactive: where action research meets design research, in Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Conference on Information Systems, Las Vegas, pp. 325–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N. (2001) Designerly Ways of Knowing: Design Discipline vs. Design Science, Design Issues 17 (3), pp. 49–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996) Creativity: Flow and Psychology of Discovery and Invention, HarperCollins, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, G. (1994) On visual thinking: the vis kids of architecture, Design Studies 15 (2), pp. 158–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregor, S. and D. Jones (2007) The anatomy of a design theory, Journal of the AIS 8 (5), Article 2, pp. 312–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hevner, A., S. March, J. Park, and S. Ram (2004) Design science in information systems research, MIS Quarterly 28 (1), pp. 75–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hevner, A. (2007) A three-cycle view of design science research, Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 19 (2), pp. 87–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschheim, R. and H. Klein (2003) Crisis in the IS field? A critical reflection on the state of the discipline, Journal of the AIS 4 (5), pp. 237–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iivari, J. (1991) A paradigmatic analysis of contemporary schools of IS development, European Journal of Information Systems 1 (4), pp. 249–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iivari, J. (2007) A paradigmatic analysis of information systems as a design science, Scandinavian Journal of IS 19 (2), pp. 39–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvinen, P. (2007) Action research is similar to design science, Quality & Quantity 41, pp. 37–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love, T. (2002) Constructing a coherent cross-disciplinary body of theory about designing and designs: some philosophical issues, International Journal of Design Studies 23 (3), pp. 345–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, S. and G. Smith (1995) Design and natural science research on information technology, Decision Support Systems 15, pp. 251–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MISQ (2008) Special issue on design science research, MIS Quarterly 32 (4), pp. 725–868.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A. and H. Simon (1976) Computer science as empirical inquiry: symbols and search, Communications of the ACM 19 (3), pp. 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunamaker, J., M. Chen, and T. D. M. Purdin (1991) Systems development in information systems research, Journal of Management Information Systems 7 (3), pp. 89–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. and C. Iacono (2001) Research commentary: desperately seeking the ‘IT’ in IT research: a call for theorizing the IT artifact, Information Systems Research 12, pp. 121–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxman, R. (1997) Design by re-representation: a model of visual reasoning in design, Design Studies 18 (4), pp. 329–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peffers, K., T. Tuunanen, M. Rothenberger, and S. Chatterjee (2008) A design science research methodology for information systems research, Journal of Management Information Systems 24 (3), pp. 45–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H. and M. Webber (1984) Planning problems are wicked problems, in Developments in Design Methodology, N. Cross (ed.), John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 135–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1996) The Sciences of Artificial, 3rd edn., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walls, J., G. Widmeyer, and O. El Sawy (1992) Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS, Information Systems Research 3 (1), pp. 36–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R. (1997) Towards a theory of artifacts: a paradigmatic base for information systems research, Journal of Information Systems 1 (1), pp. 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zmud, R. (1997) Editor’s comments, MIS Quarterly 21 (2), pp. xxi–xxii.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Business, University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, Tampa, FL, 33620, USA

    Alan Hevner

  2. School of Information Systems and Technology, Claremont Graduate University, 130 East 9th Street, Claremont, CA, 91711, USA

    Samir Chatterjee

Authors
  1. Alan Hevner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Samir Chatterjee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan Hevner .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag US

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hevner, A., Chatterjee, S. (2010). Design Science Research in Information Systems. In: Design Research in Information Systems. Integrated Series in Information Systems, vol 22. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5653-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation