Abstract
At the Centre for the Study of Learning and Performance we have developed, tested, and disseminated to schools without charge, an Electronic Portfolio Encouraging Active and Reflective Learning (ePEARL). ePEARL is designed to be faithful to predominant models of self-regulation, scaffolding and supporting learners and their educators from grade one (level one) through grade twelve and beyond (level four). ePEARL encourages learners to engage in the cyclical phases and sub-phases of forethought, performance, and self-reflection. In a series of studies, including two longitudinal quasi-experiments, we have explored the positive impacts of ePEARL on the enhancement of students’ self-regulated learning skills, their literacy skills and changes in teaching, while simultaneously researching classroom implementation fidelity and teacher professional development. This chapter briefly explains the development of ePEARL, our research program, and issues in the scalability and sustainability of knowledge tools.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This chapter is submitted for inclusion consideration in the International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies. The preparation of this chapter was aided by grants from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada and the Fonds québécois de la recherche sur la société et la culture.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Abrami, P. C. (2010). On the nature of support in computer-supported collaborative learning using gStudy. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 835–839. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.04.007.
Abrami, P. C., & Barrett, H. (2005). Directions for research and development on electronic portfolios. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31(3), 1–15. Retrieved February 1, 2013 from http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/92/86.
Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Bures, E. M., Borokhovski, E., & Tamim, R. (2011). Interaction in distance education and online learning: Using evidence and theory to improve practice. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. doi:10.1007/s12528-011-9043-x.
Abrami, P. C., Venkatesh, V., Meyer, E., & Wade, A., (in press). Using electronic portfolios to foster literacy and self regulated learning skills in elementary students. Journal of Educational Psychology.
Barrett, H. (2007). Researching electronic portfolios and learner engagement: The REFLECT initiative. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 50(6), 436–449.
Bures, E., Abrami, P., & Bentley, C. (2007). Assessing electronic portfolios—Now that we have them, what can we do with them? In G. Richards (Ed.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2007 (pp. 7030–7038). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Bures, E., Barclay, A., Abrami, P. C., Meyer, E., & Venkatesh, V. (2012). Contextualizing assessment: Students demonstrating and developing literacy and self-regulated learning skills through electronic portfolios (Manuscript submitted for publication).
Carbonara, D. (2005). Technology literacy applications in learning environments. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
Carney, J. (2005). What kind of electronic portfolio research do we need? Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, Phoenix, AZ.
Frey, B., & Schmitt, V. (2007). Coming to terms with classroom assessment. Journal of Advanced Academics, 18(3), 402–423. doi:10.4219/jaa-2007-495.
Gouvernement du Québec. (2001). Quebec Education Program—English version. Retrieved February 1, 2013 from Ministère de l’Éducation website: http://www.mels.gouv.qc.ca/dgfj/dp/programme_de_formation/primaire/educprg2001h.htm.
Herman, J. L., Gearhart, M., & Baker, E. L. (1993). Assessing writing portfolios: Issues in the validity and meaning of scores. Educational Assessment, 1(3), 201–224. doi:10.1207/s15326977ea0103_2.
Herrington, J., Reeves, T., Oliver, R., & Woo, Y. (2004). Designing authentic activities in web-based courses. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16(1), 3–29. doi:10.1007/BF02960280.
McClelland, D. C., Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A., & Lowell, E. L. (1953). The achievement motive. New York: Appleton.
Meyer, E., Abrami, P. C., Wade, A., Aslan, O., & Deault, L. (2010). Improving literacy and metacognition with electronic portfolios: Teaching and learning with ePEARL. Computers in Education, 55, 84–91. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.005.
Meyer, E., Abrami, P. C., Wade, A., & Scherzer, R. (2011). Electronic portfolios in the classroom: Factors impacting teachers’ integration of new technologies and new pedagogies. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20(2), 191–207.
Meyer, E., Wade, A., Pillay, V., Idan, E., & Abrami, P. C. (2010). Using electronic portfolios to foster communication in K-12 classrooms. In C. Black (Ed.), The dynamic classroom: Engaging students in higher education (pp. 125–133). Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing.
Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667–686. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667.
Rogers, D., & Swan, K. (2004). Self-regulated learning and internet searching. Teachers College Record, 106, 1804–1824.
Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Helplessness: On depression, development and death. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
Stiggins, R. J. (2002). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment FOR learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83, 758–765.
Upitis, R., Abrami, P. C., Brook, J., Troop, M., & Varela, W. (2010, November). Using ePEARL for music teaching: A case study. Paper presented at the International Association for the Scientific Knowledge conference, Oviedo, Spain.
Weiner, B. (1980). Human motivation. New York: Holt-Rinehart and Winston.
Wozney, L., Venkatesh, V., & Abrami, P. C. (2006). Implementing computer technologies: Teachers’ perceptions and practices. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(1), 173–207. Retrieved February 1, 2013 from http://www.editlib.org/f/5437.
Zeichner, K., & Wray, S. (2001). The teaching portfolio in US teacher education programs: What we know and what we need to know. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 613–621. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00017-8.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329–339.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). New York: Academic.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166–183. doi:10.3102/0002831207312909.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Abrami, P.C., Bures, E.M., Idan, E., Meyer, E., Venkatesh, V., Wade, A. (2013). Electronic Portfolio Encouraging Active and Reflective Learning. In: Azevedo, R., Aleven, V. (eds) International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 28. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5546-3_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5546-3_32
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5545-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-5546-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)