Skip to main content

Analyzing Navigation Patterns to Scaffold Metacognition in Hypertext Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies

Abstract

One of the affordances of hypertext environments is the freedom to choose the order of information presentation. However, learners may have difficulty self-regulating their learning in order to make navigation decisions that align with their goals. This chapter presents our work in helping students learn from hypertext using the CoMPASS hypertext system in middle school science classes. The CoMPASS system design includes navigable concept maps that reflect connections among concepts in the domain of physics and are used to help students understand the relationships between science ideas. In CoMPASS, students’ self-regulated behavior is detected through the use of computer-generated log files that allow us analyze student navigation behavior post hoc and create clusters of navigation patterns. We are then able to examine these clusters of navigation patterns to determine differences in students’ SRL processes and the types of scaffolding that they may need. This chapter presents five different navigation pattern clusters that have been identified as typical of students’ navigation behavior in CoMPASS. We further discuss how these clusters will be matched to the navigation behaviors of future students and used to inform an algorithm that will provide adaptive real-time navigation prompts in order to scaffold metacognition and self-regulated learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, P. A., Kulikowich, J., & Jetton, T. (1994). The role of subject-matter knowledge and interest in the processing of linear and nonlinear texts. Review of Educational Research, 64, 201–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, R. (2005a). Computers as metacognitive tools for enhancing learning. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 193–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, R. (2005b). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 199–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, R., Guthrie, J. T., & Seibert, D. (2004). The role of self-regulated learning in fostering students’ conceptual understanding of complex systems with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(1 and 2), 87–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Greene, J. A., Winters, F. I., & Cromley, J. G. (2008). Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 45–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S. A., Fagan, B. R., Kulikowich, J. M., & Young, M. F. (1996). Assessing hypermedia navigation through pathfinder: Prospects and limitations. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 15(3), 185–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedersen, B. B., & Hollan, J. (1995). Pad++: A zooming graphical interface for exploring alternate interface physics. In P. Szekely (Ed.), Proceedings of the Seventh Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (pp. 17–26). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolter, J. D. (1991). Writing space: The computer, hypertext, and the history of writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolter, J. D. (1998). Hypertext and the question of visual literacy. In D. Reinking, M. McKenna, L. Labbo, & R. Kiefer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolter, J. D. (2001). Writing space: Computers, hypertext and the remediation of print. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braten, I., Britt, M. A., Stromso, H. I., & Rouet, J.-F. (2011). The role of epistemic beliefs in the comprehension of multiple expository texts: Toward an integrated model. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 48–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, P. C.-H. (1999). Unlocking conceptual learning in mathematics and science with effective representational systems. Computers in Education, 33, 109–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H., Hutchinson, J., & Robin, A. F. (1989). How inferences about novel domain-related concepts can be constrained by structured knowledge. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 35, 27–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H., & Koeske, R. (1983). Network representation of a child’s dinosaur knowledge. Developmental Psychology, 19, 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clancey, W. J. (1985). Heuristic classification. Artificial Intelligence, 27, 289–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coiro, J., & Dobler, E. (2007). Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(2), 214–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, K. M. (2000). Assessing science understanding through concept maps. In J. J. Mintzes, J. H. Wandersee, & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Assessing science understanding: A human constructivist view (pp. 19–40). San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman-Hill, E. (2003). Jess in action: Java rule-based systems. Greenwich, CT: Manning Publications Company. Web site http://herzberg.ca.sandia.gov/jess/.

  • Furnas, G. W. (1986). Generalized fisheye views. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 16–23). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glinert, E. P. (1990). Visual programming environments: Paradigms and systems. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, S. M., Yeany, R. H., & Britton, B. K. (1991). The psychology of learning science. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2007). A theoretical view of Winne & Hadwin’s model of self-regulated learning: New perspectives and directions. Review of Educational Research, 77(3), 334–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics research and teaching (pp. 65–100). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Marathe, S., & Liu, L. (2007). Fish swim, rocks sit, and lungs breathe: Expert-novice understanding of complex systems. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16, 307–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hübscher, R. (1997). Visual constraint rules. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 8, 425–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hübscher, R., & Puntambekar, S. (2004). Modeling learners as individuals and as groups. In P. De Bra & W. Nejdl (Eds.), Adaptive hypermedia and adaptive web-based systems (Vol. LNCS 3137, pp. 300–303). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hübscher, R., & Puntambekar, S. (2008). Integrating knowledge gained from data mining with pedagogical knowledge. In R. S. J. d. Baker, T. Barnes & J. E. Beck (Eds.),Educational Data Mining 2008: 1st International Conference on Educational Data Mining, Proceedings. Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, M. J., & Spiro, R. J. (1995). Hypertext learning environments, cognitive flexibility, and the transfer of complex knowledge: An empirical investigation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12(5), 301–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, R. (2000). The use of multiple representations and the social construction of understanding in chemistry. In M. Jacobson & R. Kozma (Eds.), Innovations in science and mathematics education: Advanced designs for technologies of learning (pp. 11–46). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, K. A., & Kulikowich, J. M. (1996). Understanding hypertext navigation through cluster analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14(4), 385–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C. (2006). The knowledge integration perspective on learning and instruction. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook for the learning sciences (pp. 243–264). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayanan, N. H., & Hübscher, R. (1998). Visual language theory: Towards a human-computer ­interaction perspective. In B. Meyer & K. Marriott (Eds.), Visual language theory (pp. 85–127). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesbit, J. C., & Adesope, O. O. (2006). Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 76(3), 413–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton, D. P., & Newton, L. D. (2000). Do teachers support causal understanding through their discourse when teaching primary science? British Educational Research Journal, 26(5), 599–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niegemann, H. M. (2001). Analyzing navigation patterns of learning in hypermedia learning environments. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Seattle, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2004). Building on constructivist ideas and CmapTools to create a new model for education. In A. J. Cañas, J. D. Novak, & F. M. González (Eds.), Concept maps: Theory, methodology, technology, proceedings of the 1st international conference on concept mapping. Pamplona, Spain: Universidad Pública de Navarra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Technical Report IHMC CmapTools 2006–01 Rev 01–2008. Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition. Retrieved from http://cmap.ihmc.us/Publications.

  • Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pearsall, N. R., Skipper, J. E. J., & Mintzes, J. J. (1997). Knowledge restructuring in the life sciences: A longitudinal study of conceptual change in biology. Science Education, 81(2), 193–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puntambekar, S., & Stylianou, A. (2005). Designing navigation support in hypertext systems based on navigation patterns. Instructional Science, 33(5), 451–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puntambekar, S., Stylianou, A., & Goldstein, J. (2007). Comparing classroom enactments of an inquiry curriculum: Lessons learned from two teachers. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(1), 81–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puntambekar, S., Stylianou, A., & Hübscher, R. (2003). Improving navigation and learning in hypertext environments with navigable concept maps. Human Computer Interaction, 18(4), 395–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quirin, A., Cordón, O., Santamaría, J., Vargas-Quesada, B., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2008). A new variant of the Pathfinder algorithm to generate large visual science maps in cubic time. Information Processing and Management, 44, 1611–1623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouet, J.-F. (2006). Using hypertext systems. In J.-F. Rouet (Ed.), The skills of document use: From text comprehension to web-based learning (pp. 122–138). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouet, J.-F., & Coutelet, B. (2008). The acquisition of document search strategies in grade school students. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 389–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, A. L., Cooke, N. J., Hall, E. P., & Halgren, T. L. (1996). Toward an on-line knowledge assessment methodology: Building on the relationship between knowing and doing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2(1), 31–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Shavelson, R. J. (1996). Problems and issues in the use of concept maps in science assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(6), 569–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasot, A., & Suau, J. (2000). Improving teaching materials: The structuring of learning, the interrelationship of information and the search for higher levels of interactivity. Interactive Educational Multimedia, 1, 35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1990). Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, N., Anderson, C., Hong, N., Howard, B., & McGee, S. (2004). The influence of metacognitive skills on learners’ memory of information in a hypermedia environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31, 77–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, A. M., & Niederhauser, D. (2004). Learning from hypertext: Research issues and findings. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 605–620). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharples, M. (1999). How we write: Writing as creative design. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Jacobson, M. J., & Coulson, R. J. (1991). Cognitive flexibility constructivism and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. Educational Technology, 31(5), 24–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitulnik, M. W., Zembal-Saul, C., & Krajcik, J. S. (1998). Using hypermedia to represent emerging student understanding: Science learners and preservice teachers. In J. J. Mintzes, J. H. Wandersee, & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Teaching science for understanding: A human constructivist view (pp. 229–259). San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tergan, S.-O., Engelmann, T., & Hesse, F. W. (2008). Digital concept maps as powerful interfaces for enhancing information search: An experimental study of the effects of semantic cueing. In A. J. Cañas, P. Reiska, M. Åhlberg, & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Concept mapping: Connecting educators. Proceedings of the third international conference on concept mapping. Tallinn, Finland: Estonia and Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trowbridge, J. E., & Wandersee, J. H. (1998). Theory-driven graphic organizers. In J. J. Mintzes, J. H. Wandersee, & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Teaching science for understanding: A human constructivist view (pp. 95–131). San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, E. R. (1990). Envisioning information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sadhana Puntambekar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Puntambekar, S., Sullivan, S.A., Hübscher, R. (2013). Analyzing Navigation Patterns to Scaffold Metacognition in Hypertext Systems. In: Azevedo, R., Aleven, V. (eds) International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 28. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5546-3_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics