Abstract
One of the affordances of hypertext environments is the freedom to choose the order of information presentation. However, learners may have difficulty self-regulating their learning in order to make navigation decisions that align with their goals. This chapter presents our work in helping students learn from hypertext using the CoMPASS hypertext system in middle school science classes. The CoMPASS system design includes navigable concept maps that reflect connections among concepts in the domain of physics and are used to help students understand the relationships between science ideas. In CoMPASS, students’ self-regulated behavior is detected through the use of computer-generated log files that allow us analyze student navigation behavior post hoc and create clusters of navigation patterns. We are then able to examine these clusters of navigation patterns to determine differences in students’ SRL processes and the types of scaffolding that they may need. This chapter presents five different navigation pattern clusters that have been identified as typical of students’ navigation behavior in CoMPASS. We further discuss how these clusters will be matched to the navigation behaviors of future students and used to inform an algorithm that will provide adaptive real-time navigation prompts in order to scaffold metacognition and self-regulated learning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alexander, P. A., Kulikowich, J., & Jetton, T. (1994). The role of subject-matter knowledge and interest in the processing of linear and nonlinear texts. Review of Educational Research, 64, 201–252.
Azevedo, R. (2005a). Computers as metacognitive tools for enhancing learning. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 193–197.
Azevedo, R. (2005b). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 199–209.
Azevedo, R., Guthrie, J. T., & Seibert, D. (2004). The role of self-regulated learning in fostering students’ conceptual understanding of complex systems with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(1 and 2), 87–111.
Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Greene, J. A., Winters, F. I., & Cromley, J. G. (2008). Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 45–72.
Barab, S. A., Fagan, B. R., Kulikowich, J. M., & Young, M. F. (1996). Assessing hypermedia navigation through pathfinder: Prospects and limitations. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 15(3), 185–205.
Bedersen, B. B., & Hollan, J. (1995). Pad++: A zooming graphical interface for exploring alternate interface physics. In P. Szekely (Ed.), Proceedings of the Seventh Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (pp. 17–26). New York: ACM Press.
Bolter, J. D. (1991). Writing space: The computer, hypertext, and the history of writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bolter, J. D. (1998). Hypertext and the question of visual literacy. In D. Reinking, M. McKenna, L. Labbo, & R. Kiefer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bolter, J. D. (2001). Writing space: Computers, hypertext and the remediation of print. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Braten, I., Britt, M. A., Stromso, H. I., & Rouet, J.-F. (2011). The role of epistemic beliefs in the comprehension of multiple expository texts: Toward an integrated model. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 48–70.
Cheng, P. C.-H. (1999). Unlocking conceptual learning in mathematics and science with effective representational systems. Computers in Education, 33, 109–130.
Chi, M. T. H., Hutchinson, J., & Robin, A. F. (1989). How inferences about novel domain-related concepts can be constrained by structured knowledge. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 35, 27–62.
Chi, M. T. H., & Koeske, R. (1983). Network representation of a child’s dinosaur knowledge. Developmental Psychology, 19, 29–39.
Clancey, W. J. (1985). Heuristic classification. Artificial Intelligence, 27, 289–350.
Coiro, J., & Dobler, E. (2007). Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(2), 214–257.
Edmondson, K. M. (2000). Assessing science understanding through concept maps. In J. J. Mintzes, J. H. Wandersee, & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Assessing science understanding: A human constructivist view (pp. 19–40). San Diego, CA: Academic.
Friedman-Hill, E. (2003). Jess in action: Java rule-based systems. Greenwich, CT: Manning Publications Company. Web site http://herzberg.ca.sandia.gov/jess/.
Furnas, G. W. (1986). Generalized fisheye views. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 16–23). New York: ACM Press.
Glinert, E. P. (1990). Visual programming environments: Paradigms and systems. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
Glynn, S. M., Yeany, R. H., & Britton, B. K. (1991). The psychology of learning science. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Green, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2007). A theoretical view of Winne & Hadwin’s model of self-regulated learning: New perspectives and directions. Review of Educational Research, 77(3), 334–372.
Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics research and teaching (pp. 65–100). New York: Macmillan.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Marathe, S., & Liu, L. (2007). Fish swim, rocks sit, and lungs breathe: Expert-novice understanding of complex systems. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16, 307–331.
Hübscher, R. (1997). Visual constraint rules. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 8, 425–451.
Hübscher, R., & Puntambekar, S. (2004). Modeling learners as individuals and as groups. In P. De Bra & W. Nejdl (Eds.), Adaptive hypermedia and adaptive web-based systems (Vol. LNCS 3137, pp. 300–303). Berlin: Springer.
Hübscher, R., & Puntambekar, S. (2008). Integrating knowledge gained from data mining with pedagogical knowledge. In R. S. J. d. Baker, T. Barnes & J. E. Beck (Eds.),Educational Data Mining 2008: 1st International Conference on Educational Data Mining, Proceedings. Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Jacobson, M. J., & Spiro, R. J. (1995). Hypertext learning environments, cognitive flexibility, and the transfer of complex knowledge: An empirical investigation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12(5), 301–333.
Kozma, R. (2000). The use of multiple representations and the social construction of understanding in chemistry. In M. Jacobson & R. Kozma (Eds.), Innovations in science and mathematics education: Advanced designs for technologies of learning (pp. 11–46). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lawless, K. A., & Kulikowich, J. M. (1996). Understanding hypertext navigation through cluster analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14(4), 385–399.
Linn, M. C. (2006). The knowledge integration perspective on learning and instruction. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook for the learning sciences (pp. 243–264). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Narayanan, N. H., & Hübscher, R. (1998). Visual language theory: Towards a human-computer interaction perspective. In B. Meyer & K. Marriott (Eds.), Visual language theory (pp. 85–127). New York: Springer.
Nesbit, J. C., & Adesope, O. O. (2006). Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 76(3), 413–448.
Newton, D. P., & Newton, L. D. (2000). Do teachers support causal understanding through their discourse when teaching primary science? British Educational Research Journal, 26(5), 599–613.
Niegemann, H. M. (2001). Analyzing navigation patterns of learning in hypermedia learning environments. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Seattle, WA.
Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2004). Building on constructivist ideas and CmapTools to create a new model for education. In A. J. Cañas, J. D. Novak, & F. M. González (Eds.), Concept maps: Theory, methodology, technology, proceedings of the 1st international conference on concept mapping. Pamplona, Spain: Universidad Pública de Navarra.
Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Technical Report IHMC CmapTools 2006–01 Rev 01–2008. Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition. Retrieved from http://cmap.ihmc.us/Publications.
Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Pearsall, N. R., Skipper, J. E. J., & Mintzes, J. J. (1997). Knowledge restructuring in the life sciences: A longitudinal study of conceptual change in biology. Science Education, 81(2), 193–215.
Puntambekar, S., & Stylianou, A. (2005). Designing navigation support in hypertext systems based on navigation patterns. Instructional Science, 33(5), 451–481.
Puntambekar, S., Stylianou, A., & Goldstein, J. (2007). Comparing classroom enactments of an inquiry curriculum: Lessons learned from two teachers. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(1), 81–130.
Puntambekar, S., Stylianou, A., & Hübscher, R. (2003). Improving navigation and learning in hypertext environments with navigable concept maps. Human Computer Interaction, 18(4), 395–428.
Quirin, A., Cordón, O., Santamaría, J., Vargas-Quesada, B., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2008). A new variant of the Pathfinder algorithm to generate large visual science maps in cubic time. Information Processing and Management, 44, 1611–1623.
Rouet, J.-F. (2006). Using hypertext systems. In J.-F. Rouet (Ed.), The skills of document use: From text comprehension to web-based learning (pp. 122–138). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rouet, J.-F., & Coutelet, B. (2008). The acquisition of document search strategies in grade school students. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 389–406.
Rowe, A. L., Cooke, N. J., Hall, E. P., & Halgren, T. L. (1996). Toward an on-line knowledge assessment methodology: Building on the relationship between knowing and doing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2(1), 31–47.
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Shavelson, R. J. (1996). Problems and issues in the use of concept maps in science assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(6), 569–600.
Sasot, A., & Suau, J. (2000). Improving teaching materials: The structuring of learning, the interrelationship of information and the search for higher levels of interactivity. Interactive Educational Multimedia, 1, 35–46.
Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1990). Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Schwartz, N., Anderson, C., Hong, N., Howard, B., & McGee, S. (2004). The influence of metacognitive skills on learners’ memory of information in a hypermedia environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31, 77–93.
Shapiro, A. M., & Niederhauser, D. (2004). Learning from hypertext: Research issues and findings. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 605–620). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sharples, M. (1999). How we write: Writing as creative design. New York: Routledge.
Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Jacobson, M. J., & Coulson, R. J. (1991). Cognitive flexibility constructivism and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. Educational Technology, 31(5), 24–33.
Spitulnik, M. W., Zembal-Saul, C., & Krajcik, J. S. (1998). Using hypermedia to represent emerging student understanding: Science learners and preservice teachers. In J. J. Mintzes, J. H. Wandersee, & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Teaching science for understanding: A human constructivist view (pp. 229–259). San Diego, CA: Academic.
Tergan, S.-O., Engelmann, T., & Hesse, F. W. (2008). Digital concept maps as powerful interfaces for enhancing information search: An experimental study of the effects of semantic cueing. In A. J. Cañas, P. Reiska, M. Åhlberg, & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Concept mapping: Connecting educators. Proceedings of the third international conference on concept mapping. Tallinn, Finland: Estonia and Helsinki.
Trowbridge, J. E., & Wandersee, J. H. (1998). Theory-driven graphic organizers. In J. J. Mintzes, J. H. Wandersee, & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Teaching science for understanding: A human constructivist view (pp. 95–131). San Diego, CA: Academic.
Tufte, E. R. (1990). Envisioning information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Puntambekar, S., Sullivan, S.A., Hübscher, R. (2013). Analyzing Navigation Patterns to Scaffold Metacognition in Hypertext Systems. In: Azevedo, R., Aleven, V. (eds) International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 28. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5546-3_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5546-3_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5545-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-5546-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)