Materializations of Disaster: Recovering Lost Plots in a Tsunami-Affected Village in South India

Chapter

Abstract

The Asian tsunami that swept across coastal regions all around the Indian Ocean in December 2004 left innumerable affected communities at a loss. Thousands and thousands of people perished, many more were left homeless, personal and household belongings were washed away, and the afflicted populations’ trust in their surroundings was seriously compromised. The South Indian village of Tharangambadi on the coast of Tamil Nadu was one of the places badly hit by the disaster (see F. Hastrup 2008, 2009). Out of the village’s total population of about 7,000, the tsunami killed 314 persons, the clear majority of whom belonged to the 1,200 fishing households settled along the beach lining the Bay of Bengal.

In this chapter, I focus on the recovery process as undertaken by survivors in Tharangambadi in the wake of the tsunami. Anthropologists have recently noted that even seemingly disempowering experiences of disorder and fragmentation do not lead to passivity; in many societies, crises may simply constitute a context for subjective agency (Vigh 2008: 10-11). In times of trouble, people often display a remarkable talent for living and a degree of resilience, which prompts a need to rethink dominant models of trauma, as Nancy Scheper-Hughes has observed (2008). The capacity to act and exercise resilience in the face of overwhelming events was certainly apparent in the case of Tharangambadi, and on the basis of 10 months of anthropological fieldwork among men and women of the village’s fishing community, conducted in 2005, 2006 and 2008, I explore how the villagers have worked over time to make their local world inhabitable in the face of a brutal and disconcerting experience.

Keywords

Beach Fishing Parkin Lost Stake 

References

  1. Das, V. 2007. Life and Words: Violence and the Descent into the Ordinary. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  2. Eng, D.L. and D. Kazanjian, 2003. ‘Introduction: Mourning Remains’. In Loss, eds. D.L. Eng and D. Kazanjian, 1-25. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  3. Hastrup, F. 2008. ‘Natures of change: weathering the World in post-tsunami Tamil Nadu’. Nature and Culture 3(2), 135-150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hastrup, F. 2009. Weathering the World: Recovery in the Wake of the Tsunami in a Tamil Fishing Village. PhD Thesis, University of Copenhagen, Submitted in January 2009.Google Scholar
  5. Hastrup, K. 2007. ‘Performing the World: Agency, anticipation and creativity’. In Creativity and Cultural Improvisation, eds. E. Hallam and T. Ingold, 193-206. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  6. Henare, A., M. Holbraad and S. Wastell. 2007. ‘Introduction: Thinking through things’. In Thinking Through Things: Theorising Artifact Ethnographically, eds. A. Henare, M. Holbraad and S. Wastell, 1-31. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Hetherington, K. 2004. ‘Secondhandedness: Consumption, disposal, and absent presence’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 22(1), 157-173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hilhorst, D. and G. Bankoff. 2007. ‘Introduction: Mapping vulnerability’. In Mapping Vulnerability: Disasters, Development and People, eds. G. Bankoff, G. Frerks and D. Hilhorst, 1-9. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  9. Hoffman, S.M. and A. Oliver-Smith. 1999. ‘Anthropology and the angry earth: An overview’. In The Angry Earth: Disaster in Anthropological Perspective, eds. A. Oliver-Smith and S.M. Hoffman, 1-16. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Ingold, T. 2000. The Perception of the Environment: Essays in livelihood, dwelling and skill, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Miller, D. 2005. ‘Materiality: An introduction’. In Materiality, ed. D. Miller, 1-50. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Oliver-Smith, A. 1999. ‘What is a Disaster? Anthropological perspectives on a persistent question’. In The Angry Earth: Disaster in Anthropological Perspective, eds. A. Oliver-Smith and S.M. Hoffman, 18-34. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Oliver-Smith, A. and S.M. Hoffman 2002. ‘Introduction: Why anthropologists should study disasters’. In Catastrophe and Culture: The Anthropology of Disaster, eds. S.M. Hoffman and A. Oliver-Smith, 3-22. Oxford: James Currey, School of American Research Advanced Seminar Series.Google Scholar
  14. Olsen, B. 2003. ‘Material culture after text: Re-membering things’. Norwegian Archaeological Review 36(2), 87-104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Parkin, D. 1999. ‘Mementoes as transitional objects in human displacement’. Journal of Material Culture, 4(3), 303-320.Google Scholar
  16. Pedersen, M.A. 2007. ‘Talismans of thought: Shamanist ontologies and extended cognition in Northern Mongolia’. In Thinking Through Things: Theorising Artifact Ethnographically, eds. A. Henare, M. Holbraad and S. Wastell, 172-204. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Rowlands, M. and C. Tilley. 2006. ‘Monuments and memorials’. In Handbook of Material Culture, eds. Tilley, C., W. Keane, S. Küchler, M. Rowlands, and P. Spyer, 500-515. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  18. Scheper-Hughes, N. 2008. ‘A Talent for life: Reflections on human vulnerability and resilience’. Ethnos 73(1), 25-56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Telford, J., J. Cosgrave and R. Houghton. 2006. Joint Evaluation of the International Response to the Indian Ocean Tsunami: Synthesis Report. London: Tsunami Evaluation Coalition.Google Scholar
  20. Vigh, H. 2008. ‘Crisis and chronicity: Anthropological perspectives on continuous conflict and decline’ Ethnos 73(1), 5-24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wallman, S. 1992. ‘Introduction: Contemporary futures’. In Contemporary Futures: Perspectives from Social Anthropology, ed. S. Wallman, 1-20. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations