Advertisement

Conclusion: Diversity in the Future

Chapter
  • 1.2k Downloads

Abstract

Discrimination on the basis of race, in the United States and elsewhere, is a tenacious social pathology that has plagued Western civilization. It is among the most potent topics for public discussion, in particular among interracial audiences. Most scholars trace the origins of discrimination to the Atlantic slave trade and European colonization. Subsequently, African-Americans are cast as victims and Euro-Americans by way of the slave trade as the perpetrators of African-American victimization. Eventually such victimization spread to other non-European, non-biracial, male, gay, and lesbian immigrant populations, whose demographic status located them on the periphery of the Western power structure. However, the origin of racial and other forms of discrimination is much more extensive than the Western power structure, which historically Western scholars in particular have been unwilling to acknowledge.

Keywords

Skin Color Racial Discrimination Environmental Domination Light Skin Bell Curve 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Herrnstein, R., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beatty, B. (2009). The bell curve. (Revised article) [Human Intelligence online]. http://www.indiana.edu/intell/bellcurve.shtml. Accessed 26 June 2009.
  3. 3.
    Bradley, M. (1978). The iceman inheritance. Toronto: Dorset.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Welsing, F. (1970). The Cress theory of color confrontation and racism. Washington, DC: C-R Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kitano, H. (1985). Race relations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Powell, A. (1997). Through my grandfather’s eyes: ties that bind. Paper presented at the 1997 National Conference of African American Studies and Hispanic and Latino Studies, Houston, Texas.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pratt, J. (1950). America’s colonial experiment. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hall, R. (2003). Discrimination among oppressed populations. Lewiston, NY: Mellen.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hyde, C. (1995). The meanings of whiteness. Qualitative Sociology, 18(1), 87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cooley, C. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Schreiber.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chan, S. (1991). Asian Americans: an interpretive history. Boston: Twayne.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hedley, M. (1994). The presentation of gendered conflict in popular movies: affective stereotypes, cultural sentiments, and men’s motivation. Sex Roles, 31, 721–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hoetink, H. (1967). The two variants in Caribbean race relations: A contribution to the sociology of segmented societies. (E. M. Hookykaas, Trans.) London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bales, R. (1951). Interaction process analysis: a method for the study of small groups. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., and White, R. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created social climates. Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 271–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shaw, M. (1976). The psychology of small groups. Experimental Social Psychology, 1, 111–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Homans, G. (1974). Elementary forms of social behavior. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Crosbie, P. (1975). Interaction in small groups. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gleitman, H. (1986). Psychology. New York: Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kailash, (1997). Human ecological stress and demographic decline: a case of Negritos of Andamans. Indian Journal of Social Work, 58(3), 382–402.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Teall, B. (2000). Using solution-oriented interventions in an ecological frame: a case illustration. Social Work in Education, 22(1), 54–61.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Smith, S. (1999). “Now that mom is the Lord’s arms, I just have to live the way she taught me”: reflections on an elderly, African American mother’s death. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 32(2), 41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jory, B., & Anderson, D. (1999). Intimate justice II: fostering mutuality, reciprocity, and accommodation in therapy for psychological abuse. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 25(3), 349–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Beverly, C. (1989). Treatment issues for black, alcoholic clients. Social Casework, 70(6), 370–374.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Green, R., & Ephross, P. (1991). Human behavior theory and social work practice. New York: DeGruyter.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mackey, R., & O’Brien, B. (1999). Adaptation in lasting marriages. Families in Society, 80(6), 587–596.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schwartz, A. (1999). Americanization and cultural preservation in Seattle’s Settlement House: a Jewish adaptation to the Anglo-American model of settlement work. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 26(3), 25–47.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Erwin, E., & Kipness, N. (1997). Fostering democratic values in inclusive early childhood settings. Early Childhood Education Journal, 25(1), 57–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Monteiro, A. (2000). Being an African in the world: the Du Boisian epistemology. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 568, 220–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Iida, K. (2000). Globalization and human rights: conversion of intellectual paradig(m). Japanese Journal of Social Services, 2, 87–100.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Holton, R. (2000). Globalization’s cultural consequences. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 570, 140–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Barak, M. (2000). The inclusive workplace: an ecosystems approach to diversity management. Social Work, 45(4), 339–352.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Park, S., & Green, C. (2000). Is transracial adoption in the best interest of ethnic minority children?: questions concerning legal and scientific interpretations of a child’s best interests. Adoption Quarterly, 3(4), 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Digger [pseud.](2009). Vicente Fox: illegal aliens ‘doing jobs that not even blacks want to do.’ http://www.diggersrealm.com/mt/archives/001031.html. Accessed 14 June 2009.
  36. 36.
    Naisbitt, J. (1982) Megatrends: ten new directions transforming our lives. New York: Warner Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social WorkMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations