Skip to main content

Intracytoplasmic Morphologically Selected Sperm Injection

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Practical Manual of In Vitro Fertilization

Abstract

Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI) is now a reality in ART practice but still with a lot of questions regarding (1) the terminology of vacuoles, their classification, their location on the sperm head, and their origin and meaning; (2) the application of IMSI instead of in vitro fertilization in cases of unexplained infertility; (3) the age of the woman; and (4) the technical aspects. We have to be aware that this technique is demanding and has to be performed in the best working conditions so as not to impair the oocyte quality. The introduction of IMSI has the advantage that embryologists realize that more attention has to be paid during sperm selection even in case of classical intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). The application of IMSI leads to more and better quality blastocysts and, as consequence, it increases the chances of selecting the proper embryo for transfer with high implantation potential. Even though there is no real proof in the human species on the abnormal outcome generated by spermatozoa carrying vacuoles, a higher and better-resolution technique has to be added as an additional tool for ICSI knowing the possible consequence of sperm DNA damage for offsprings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Svalander P, Jakobsson AH, Forsberg AS, et al. The outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection is unrelated to “strict criteria” sperm morphology. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:1019–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mansour RT, Aboulghar MA, Serour GI, et al. The effect of sperm parameters on the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 1995;64:982–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nagy ZP, Liu J, Joris H, et al. The result of intracytoplasmic sperm injection is not related to any of the three basic sperm parameters. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:1123–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. WHO. WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and semen–cervical mucus interactions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kruger TF, Acosta AA, Simmons KF, et al. Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1988;49:112–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. De Vos A, Van De Velde H, Joris H, et al. Influence of individual sperm morphology on fertilization, embryo morphology, and pregnancy outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:42–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ainsworth C, Nixon B, Jansen RP, et al. First recorded pregnancy and normal birth after ICSI using electrophoretically isolated spermatozoa. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:197–200.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Said TM, Grunewald S, Paasch U, et al. Advantage of combining magnetic cell separation with sperm preparation techniques. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;10:740–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Huszar G, Jakab A, Sakkas D, et al. Fertility testing and ICSI sperm selection by hyaluronic acid binding: clinical and genetic aspects. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14:650–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bartoov B, Berkovitz A, Eltes F. Selection of spermatozoa with normal nuclei to improve the pregnancy rate with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1067–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bartoov B, Berkovitz A, Eltes F. Selection of spermatozoa with normal nuclei to improve the pregnancy rate with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1067–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bartoov B, Berkovitz A, Eltes F, et al. Pregnancy rates are higher with intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection than with conventional intracytoplasmic injection. Fertil Steril. 2003;80:1413–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Yaari S, et al. The morphological normalcy of the sperm nucleus and pregnancy rate of intracytoplasmic injection with morphologically selected sperm. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:185–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Lederman H, et al. How to improve IVF-ICSI outcome by sperm injection? Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;12:634–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Junca AM, Cohen-Bacrie P, Hazout A. Improvement of fertilisation and pregnancy rate after intracytoplasmic fine morphology selected sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 2004;82 Suppl 2:S173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hazout A, Dumomt-Hassant M, Junca AM, et al. High-magnification ICSI overcomes paternal effect resistant to conventional ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;12:19–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vanderzwalmen P, Hiemer A, Rubner P, et al. Blastocyst development after sperm selection at high magnification is associated with size and number of nuclear vacuoles. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17:617–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cassuto N, Bouret D, Plouchart J, et al. A new real-time morphology classification for human spermatozoa: a link for fertilization and improved embryo quality. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:1616–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bartoov B, Eltes F, Pansky M, et al. Improved diagnosis of male fertility potential via a combination of quantitative ultramorphology and routine semen analyses. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:2069–75.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mundy AJ, Ryder TA, Edmonds DK. A quantitative study of sperm head ultrastructure in subfertile males with excess sperm precursors. Fertil Steril. 1994;61:751–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Ellenbogen A, et al. Does the presence of nuclear vacuoles in human sperm selected for ICSI affect pregnancy outcome? Hum Reprod. 2006;21:1787–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vanderzwalmen P, Bertin-Segal G, Geerts L, et al. Sperm morphology and IVF pregnancy rate: comparison between Percoll gradient centrifugation and swim-up procedures. Hum Reprod. 1991;6:581–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Shoukir Y, Chardonnens D, Campana A, et al. Blastocyst development from supernumerary embryos after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a paternal influence. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:1632–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tesarik J, Greco E, Mendoza C. Late but not early paternal effect on human embryo development is related to sperm DNA fragmentation. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:611–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tesarik J. Paternal effects on cell division in the preimplantation embryo. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;10:370–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Barth AD, Oko RJ. Defects of the sperm head. In: Barth AD, Oko RJ, editors. Abnormal morphology of bovine spermatozoa. Ames: IS Iowa State University Press; 1988. p. 130–92.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Thundathil J, Palasz A, Barth A, et al. Fertilization characteristics and in vitro embryo production with bovine sperm containing multiple vacuoles. Mol Reprod Dev. 1998;50:328–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Antinori M, Licata E, Dani G, et al. Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection: a prospective randomized trial. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;16:835–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nadalini M, Tarozzi N, Distratis V, et al. Impact of intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection on assisted reproduction outcome. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19:45–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Oliveira JB, Massaro FC, Mauri AL, et al. Motile sperm organelle morphology examination is stricter than Tygerberg criteria. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;18:320–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Menkveld R, Stander FS, Kotze TJ, et al. The evaluation of morphological characteristics of human spermatozoa according to stricter criteria. Hum Reprod. 1990;5:586–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Wittemer C, Pujol A, Boughali H, et al. The impact of high-magnification evaluation of sperm on ART outcome. Hum Reprod. 2006;22 Suppl 1:i59–60.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lalancette C, Miller D, Li Y, et al. Paternal contributions: new functional insights for spermatozoal RNA. J Cell Biochem. 2008;6:633–42.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Dadoune JP. Spermatozoal RNAs: what about their functions? Microsc Res Tech. 2009;72:536–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Greco E, Scarselli F, Iacobelli M, et al. Efficient treatment of infertility due to sperm DNA damage by ICSI with testicular spermatozoa. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:226–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sakkas D, Juan G, Alvarez JG. Sperm DNA fragmentation: mechanisms of origin, impact on reproductive outcome, and analysis. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(4):1027–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Virro MR, Larson-Cook KL, Evenson DP. Sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) parameters are related to fertilization, blastocyst development, and ongoing pregnancy in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Fertil Steril. 2004;81:1289–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Seli E, Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB, et al. Extent of nuclear damage in ejaculated spermatozoa impacts on blastocyst development after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2004;82:378–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Muriel L, Garrido N, Fernandez JL, et al. Value of the sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation level, as measured by the sperm chromatin dispersion test, in the outcome of in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:371–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Nasr-Esfahani MH, Salehi M, Razavi S, et al. Effect of sperm DNA damage and sperm protamine deficiency on fertilization and embryo development post-ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;11:198–205.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Larson K, DeJonge C, Barnes A, et al. Relationship of assisted reproductive technique (ART) outcomes with sperm chromatin integrity and maturity as measured by the sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA). Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1717–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Jones G, Trounson A, Lolatgis N, et al. Factors affecting the success of human blastocyst development and pregnancy following in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 1998;70:1022–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Hammadeh M, Nkemayim D, Georg T, et al. Sperm morphology and chromatin condensation before and after semen processing. Arch Androl. 2000;44:221–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Aitken R. Origins and consequences of DNA damage in male germ cells. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14:727–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Barratt C, Aitken J, Björndahl L, et al. Sperm DNA: organisation, protection and vulnerability: from basic science to clinical applications—a position report. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:824–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Cayli S, Jakab A, Ovari L, et al. Biochemical markers of sperm function: male fertility and sperm selection for ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;7:462–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Gopalkrishnan K, Padwal V, Meherji PK, et al. Poor quality of sperm as it affects repeated early pregnancy loss. Arch Androl. 2000;45:111–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Franco JG, Baruffi RL, Mauri AL, et al. Significance of large nuclear vacuoles in human spermatozoa: implications for ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17:42–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Garolla A, Fortini D, Menegazzo M, et al. High power magnification microscopy and functional status analysis of sperm in the evaluation and selection before ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17:610–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Baborova P, Uher P, Stecher A. Correlation between morphological semen parameters and sperm nuclear DNA damage: focus on the nuclear vacuoles and patient with environmental stress. J Reproduktionsmed Endokrinol. 2008;5:289–90.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Oliveira J, Massaro F, Baruffi R, et al. Correlation between semen analysis by motile sperm organelle morphology examination and sperm DNA damage. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(5):1937–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Peer S, Eltes F, Berkovitz A, et al. Is fine morphology of the human sperm nuclei affected by in vitro incubation at 37 degrees C? Fertil Steril. 2007;88:1589–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kacem O, Sifer C, Barraud-Lange V, et al. Sperm nuclear vacuoles, as assessed by motile sperm organellar morphological examination, are mostly of acrosomal origin. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;20:132–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Morozumi K, Yanagimachi R. Incorporation of the acrosome into the oocyte during intracytoplasmic sperm injection could be potentially hazardous to embryo development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:14209–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Gandini L, Lombardo F, Paoli D, et al. Study of apoptotic DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:830–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Watanabe S, Tanaka A, Fujii S, Mizunuma H, et al. No relationship between chromosome aberrations and vacuole-like structures on human sperm head. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:i96–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Westbrook A, Diekman A, Klotz K, et al. Spermatid-specific expression of the novel X-linked gene product SPAN-X localized to the nucleus of human spermatozoa. Biol Reprod. 2000;63:469–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Toshimori K. In: Toshimori K, editors. In: Dynamics of the Mammalian Sperm Head: Modifications and Maturation Events From Spermatogenesis to Egg Activation. In Advances in Anatomy, Embryology and Cell Biology. Dynamics of the mammalian sperm head, dynamics of the sperm nucleus; 2009. p. 43–51. Kindle Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Hammoud I, Albert M, Bergere M, et al. Can IMSI (X6000) be more efficient than ICSI to select spermatozoa without nuclear fragmentation? Hum Reprod. 2009;24:i214–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Menezo Y, Russo G, Tosti E, et al. Expression profile of genes coding for DNA repair in human oocytes using pangenomic microarrays, with a special focus on ROS linked decays. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2007;24:513–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Brandriff B, Pedersen RA. Repair of the ultraviolet-irradiated male genome in fertilized mouse eggs. Science. 1981;211:1431–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Kobayashi H, Sato A, Otsu E, et al. Aberrant DNA methylation of imprinted loci in sperm from oligospermic patients. Hum Mol Genet. 2007;16:2542–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Marques CJ, Costa P, Vaz B, Carvalho F, et al. Abnormal methylation of imprinted genes in human sperm is associated with oligozoospermia. Mol Hum Reprod. 2008;14:67–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Fernández-Gonzalez R, Nuno Moreira P, Perez-Crespo M, et al. Long term effects of mouse intracytoplasmic sperm injection with DNA-fragmented sperm on health and behavior of adult offspring. Biol Reprod. 2008;78:761–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Lewis S, Aitken R. DNA damage to spermatozoa has impacts on fertilization and pregnancy. Cell Tissue Res. 2005;322:33–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Paul M, et al. The chance of having a healthy normal child following intracytoplasmic morphologically-selected sperm injection (IMSI) treatment is higher compared to conventional IVF-ICSI treatment. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:S20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Suganuma R, Yanagimachi R, Meistrich ML. Decline in fertility of mouse sperm with abnormal chromatin during epididymal passage as revealed by ICSI. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:3101–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Steele EK, McClure N, Maxwell RJ, Lewis SE. A comparison of DNA damage in testicular and proximal epididymal spermatozoa in obstructive azoospermia. Mol Hum Reprod. 1999;5:831–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Vanderzwalmen MSc .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vanderzwalmen, P. et al. (2012). Intracytoplasmic Morphologically Selected Sperm Injection. In: Nagy, Z., Varghese, A., Agarwal, A. (eds) Practical Manual of In Vitro Fertilization. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1780-5_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1780-5_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-1779-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-1780-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics