Maintaining Abstinence in College: Temptations and Tactics
As the previous chapter notes, the Collegiate Recovery Community (CRC) at Texas Tech University maintains an impressive relapse rate of only 4.4% per semester, which means that more than 95% of the community members continue their successful recovery each semester. Although one of bedrock beliefs of the Center for Study of Addiction and Recovery is that young men and women who are part of the Collegiate Recovery Community that the center supports should be striving for a “recovery” that goes far beyond day-to-day sobriety, it is important to recognize that in the midst of building a higher level of recovery, members must sometimes draw upon various strategies, ranging from the psychological to the physical to make it through their day, and their hard-won states of sobriety have to be defended against temptations that differ from member to member.
KeywordsCocaine Ibuprofen Defend Heroin
- Annis, H. M., & Martin, G. (1985). The drug-taking confidence questionnaire. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Addiction Research Foundation of Ontario.Google Scholar
- Bruning, J. L., & Kintz, B. L. (1987). Computational handbook of statistics. Glenview, Illinois: Scott Foresman & Co.Google Scholar
- Callaghan, R. C., Hathaway, A., Cunningham, J. A., Vettese, L. C., Wyatt, S., & Taylor, L. (2005). Does stage-of-change predict dropout in a culturally diverse sample of adolescents admitted to inpatient substance-abuse treatment? A test of the Transtheoretical Model. Addictive Behaviors, 30, 1834–1847.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cancer Prevention Research Center (2003). Alcohol: Processes of change. http://www.uri.edu/research/cprc/Measures/Alcohol06.htm.
- Cohen, P. J., Glaser, B. A., Calhoun, G. B., Bradshaw, C. P., & Petrocelli, J. V. (2005). Examining readiness for change: A preliminary evaluation of the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment with incarcerated adolescents. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 38, 45–62.Google Scholar
- DiClemente, C. C., & Prochaska, J. O. (1985). Processes and stages of self-change: Coping and competence in smoking behavior change. In S. Shiffman & T. A. Wills (Eds.), Coping behavior and drug use. San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
- Greenstein, D. K., Franklin, M. E., & McGuffin, P. (1999). Measuring motivation to change: An examination of the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment questionnaire (URICA) in an adolescent sample. Psychotherapy, 36, 47–55.Google Scholar
- Humphreys, K. (2004). Circles of recovery: Self-help organizations for addictions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- McConnaughy, E. A., DiClemente, C. C., Prochaska, J. O., & Velicer, W. F. (1989). Stages of change in psychotherapy: A follow-up report. Psychotherapy, 26, 494–503.Google Scholar
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (2000). University of Rhode Island change assessment scale (URICA). NIAAA Publications. http://www.niaaa.nih.gov/publications/urica.htm.
- Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1986a). Toward a comprehensive model of change. In W. R. Miller & N. Heather (Eds.), Treating addictive behaviors (pp. 3–27). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
- Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1986b). The transtheoretical approach: Towards a systematic eclectic framework. In J. C. Norcross (Ed.), Handbook of eclectic psychotherapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
- Rogers, C. R. (1951). Client-centered therapy. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar