Skip to main content

Technology’s Impact on the Gaps Model of Service Quality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Service Science

Abstract

This chapter presents a foundational framework for service science – the Gaps Model of Service Quality. For over two decades the model has been used across industries and worldwide to help companies formulate strategies to deliver quality service, to integrate customer focus across functions, and to provide a foundation for service as a competitive strategy. It was developed at a time when most services were delivered interpersonally and in real time without the advantages (and sometimes disadvantages) of technology infusion. In the intervening years, technology has profoundly changed the nature of service(s) and at the same time it has influenced strategies for closing each of the service quality gaps. Thus, this chapter has a dual purpose: to provide a general overview of the Gaps Model of Service Quality and to demonstrate how key aspects of the model have changed and evolved due to advances in technologies. We begin with background on the Gaps Model and a discussion of the role of technology and services in general. We then discuss strategies for closing each gap in the model and illustrate the influence of technologies on these fundamental management strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arnould , E. J. and Price , L. L. (1993), “River Magic: Extraordinary Experience and the Extended Service Encounter,” Journal of Consumer Research, 20 (June), 24-45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber , F. and Strack , R. (2005), “The Surprising Economics of a ‘People Business’,” Harvard Business Review, 83 (June), 80–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry , L. L. and Parasuraman , A. (1991), Marketing Services. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry , L. L. and Seltman , K. D. (2007), “Building a Strong Services Brand: Lessons from Mayo Clinic,” Business Horizons, 50 (May–June), 199–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitner , M. J. (2001), “Service and Technology: Opportunities and Paradoxes,” Managing Service Quality, 11 (6), 375-379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitner , M. J. and Brown S. W. (2008), “The Service Imperative,” Business Horizons 50 th Anniversary Issue, 51 (January-February), 39-47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitner , M. J., Booms , B. H. and Tetreault , M. S. (1990), "The Service Encounter: Diagnosing Favorable and Unfavorable Incidents," Journal of Marketing, 54 (January), 71-84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitner , M. J., Ostrom , A. L. and Morgan , F. N. (2008), “Service Blueprinting: A Practical Technique for Service Innovation,” California Management Review, Spring 2008, 66-94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding , W., Kalra , A., Staelin, R. and Zeithaml , V. A. (1993), "A Dynamic Process Model of Service Quality: From Expectations to Behavioral Intentions," Journal of Marketing Research, 30 (Winter), 7-27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady , M. K. and Cronin , J. J., Jr., “Some New Thoughts on Conceptualizing Perceived Service Quality: A Hierarchical Approach,” Journal of Marketing, 65 (July), 34-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper , R. G. and Edgett , S. J. (1999), Product Development for the Service Sector, Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edvardsson , B., Gustafsson , A, Johnson , M. D. and Sanden , B. (2000), New Service Development and Innovation in the New Economy, Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur AB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell , C., Mithas , S., Morgeson , F. V. III, and Krishnan , M. S. (2006), “Customer Satisfaction and Stock Prices: High Returns, Low Risk,” Journal of Marketing, 70 (January) 3-14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henard , D. H. and Szymanski , D. M. (2001), “Why Some New Products Are More Successful than Others,” Journal of Marketing, 28 (August), 362-375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heskett , J. L., Sasser , W. E., Jr. and Schlesinger , L. A. (1997), The Service-Profit Chain, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IfM and IBM (2007), Succeeding Through Service Innovation : A Discussion Paper, Cambridge, United Kingdom: University of Cambridge Institute for Manufacturing .

    Google Scholar 

  • Li , C. and Van Boskirk, S. (2005), “U.S. Online Marketing Forecast: 2005-2010,” forrester.com, May 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loveman , G. (2003), “Diamonds in the Data Mine,” Harvard Business Review, 81 (May), 109-112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meuter , M. L., Bitner , M. J., Ostrom , A. L. and Brown , S. W. (2005), “Choosing among Alternative Service Delivery Modes: An Investigation of Customer Trial of Self-Service Technologies,” Journal of Marketing, 69 (April), 61–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mick , D. G. and Fournier, S. (2001), “Paradoxes of Technology: Consumer Cognizance, Emotions, and Coping Strategies,” Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (September), 123-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver , R. L. (1997), Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer, New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A. and Colby, C. L. (2001), Techno-Ready Marketing: How and Why Your Customers Adopt Technology, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A, Zeithaml, V. A. and Berry, L. L. (1985), ” A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research,” Journal of Marketing, 49 (4), 41-50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman A., Zeithaml, V. A. and Berry, L. L. (1988), “SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality,” Journal of Retailing, 64 (Spring), 12-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A. and Malhotra, A. (2005), “E-S-QUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Assessing Electronic Service Quality,” Journal of Service Research, 7 (February), 213-233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rust, R.T. and Oliver, R. L. (2000), “Should We Delight the Customer?” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28 (Winter), 86-94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rust, R. T., Moorman, C. and Dickson, P. R. (2002), “Getting a Return on Quality: Revenue Expansion, Cost Reduction, or Both?” Journal of Marketing, 66 (October), 7-24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B. and Bowen, D. E. (1995), Winning the Service Game. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B. and Schechter, D. (1991), “Development of a Personnel Selection System for Service Jobs,” in Service Quality: Multidisciplinary and Multinational Perspectives, S. W. Brown, E. Gummesson, B. Edvardsson, and B. Gustavsson, eds. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 217–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tax, S., Brown S. and Chandrashekaran, M. (1998), “Customer Evaluations of Service Complaint Experiences: Implications for Relationship Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 62 (April), 60-76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L. and Lusch, R. F. (2004), “Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 68 (January), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoef, P. C., Antonides, G. and de Hoog, A. N. (2004), “Service Encounters as a Sequence of Events: The Importance of Peak Experiences,” Journal of Service Research, 7 (August), 53-64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. C. and Ostrom, A. L. (2006), “Complaining to the Masses: The Role of Protest Framing in Customer-Created Complaint Web Sites,” Journal of Consumer Research, 33 (September), 220-230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L. and Parasuraman, A. (1993), “The Nature and Determinants of Customer Expectations of Service,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21 (Winter), 1-12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L. and Parasuraman, A. (1996), “The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality,” Journal of Marketing, 60 (April), 31-46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, V. A., Bitner, M. J. and Gremler, D. D. (2009), Services Marketing: Integrating Customer Focus Across the Firm, 5th edition, New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A. and Berry, L. L. (1990), Delivering Quality Service: Balancing Customer Perceptions and Expectations, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary Jo Bitner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bitner, M.J., Zeithaml, V.A., Gremler, D.D. (2010). Technology’s Impact on the Gaps Model of Service Quality. In: Maglio, P., Kieliszewski, C., Spohrer, J. (eds) Handbook of Service Science. Service Science: Research and Innovations in the Service Economy. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1628-0_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics