Skip to main content

The Qualitative Study on Contents Analysis/Construction Method for e-Learning

Focusing on the Semantic Relationship Among Represented Media

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Learning and Instruction in the Digital Age

Abstract

The aim of this study is to develop a method of qualitative analysis for extracting features/characteristics from e-learning contents, in consideration of the semantic relationship between figures and sentences. In order to extract the features/characteristics, we propose a method of contents analysis for “characteristics on frames” and “sequences of frames.” On the basis of this analysis, we propose a method for contents construction. In comparison with previous research on the subject, our research is aimed to the synergy effect in the meaningful relationship among figures, sentences, and sound narrations; we take a qualitative analysis approach from the point of view of cognitive and linguistic semantics. As a result of that, we extracted three patterns: “Progressive pattern,” “Regressive pattern,” and “Spiral pattern” from the characteristics on analyzed frames. Also, we extracted two patterns for chunked frame sequences: “liner/branch/binding” and “Liner/nonbinding.” Moreover, we try to test “synergy effect” for the compounded contents among figures, sentences, and sound narrations. Also, we propose the concept of “Dance of understanding” from the point of the semantic relationship among those media. We define that “Dance of understanding” is internal behavior to make harmony in brain for understanding a series of learning/instructional materials, accompanied with the several represented media. We assume the degree of this harmony “synergy effect.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bruner, R. (1967). Studies in cognitive growth. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, L. J. (1977). Instructional design: principles and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrell, P. L. (1992). Awareness of text structure: effect on recall. Language Learning, 42, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, B. (1999). Design, development and implementation of a WWW-based course-support system. Proceedings of the 7th conference of advanced learning technologies, 94–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, W., Carey, L., and Carey, J. (2001). The systematic design of instruction (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diehl, V., & Mills, C. (1995). The effect of interaction with the device described by procedural text onrecall, true/false, and task performance. Memory & Cognition, 23, 675–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eveland, W. P., & Dunwoody, S. (2001). User control and structural isomorphism or disorientation and cognitive load?. Communication Research, 28(1), 48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagne, R., Wager, W., Goals, K., & Keller, J. (2005). Principles of instructional design (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keiko, I. (2000). Comprehension of expository text, a line graph helps readers to build a SituationModel. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 48, 333–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J. R., Anglin, G. J., & Carney, R. N. (1987). On empirically validating functions of pictures in prose (51–86). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. D. (1983). Component display theory. In C. Reigeluth (Ed), Instructional design theories and models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagata, N., & Okamoto T. (2008). The qualitative study on contents analysis/construction method for e-Learning Focusing on the semantic relationship between figure & sentences-. Proceedings of the IADIS (International association for development of the information society) international conference on CELDA (Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age), 137–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagata N., & Anma, F., Okamoto, T. (2008). The knowledge circulated – organizational system for e-Learning management -Focusing on Know-How of contents-construction methods-. Proceedings of the AACE (Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education) international conference on e-Learn 2008, pp. 1117–1127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieminen, P. (2001). Videolecturing for international students. Proceedings of International PEG Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okamoto, T. (2000). A distance ecological model to support self/collaborative-learning via internet. Proceedings of the international conference of computer on education, pp. 795–799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okamoto, T., Cristea, A. I., and Kayama, M. (2000). Towards intelligent media-oriented distance learning and education environments. In Proceedings of the international conference of computer on education, pp. 61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. H., and Kiewra, K. A. (1995). Visual argument: graphic organizers are superior to outlines in improving learning from text. Jornal of Educational Psychology, 87, 455–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Susan, M. M. (1964). Good frames and bad. New York: McKay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1958). Teaching machines. Science, 128, 969–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • William, W. L., & Owens, D. L. (2003). Instructional design. Japan: e-Learning Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naomi Nagata .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nagata, N., Okamoto, T. (2010). The Qualitative Study on Contents Analysis/Construction Method for e-Learning. In: Spector, J., Ifenthaler, D., Isaias, P., Kinshuk, Sampson, D. (eds) Learning and Instruction in the Digital Age. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1551-1_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics