Wavelets pp 49-68 | Cite as

Discrete Wavelet Transform

  • Robert X. Gao
  • Ruqiang Yan


According to the definition of the continuous wavelet transform (CWT) given in (3.7), Chap. 3, the scale parameter s and translation parameter \(\tau\) can be varied continuously. As a result, performing the CWT on a signal will lead to the generation of redundant information. Although the redundancy is useful in some applications, such as signal denoising and feature extraction where desired performance is achieved at the cost of increased computational time and memory size, other applications may need to emphasize reduced computational time and data size, for example, in image compression and numerical computation. Such requirements illustrate the need for reducing redundancy in the wavelet coefficients among different scales as much as possible, while at the same time, avoiding sacrificing the information contained in the original signal. This can be achieved by parameter discretization, as described in the following section.


  1. Abbasion S, Rafsanjani A, Farshidianfar A, Irani N (2007) Rolling element bearings multi-fault classification based on the wavelet denoising and support vector machine. Mech Syst Signal Process 21:2933–2945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Addison N (2002) The illustrated wavelet transform handbook. Taylor & Francis, New YorkMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burt P, Adelson E (1983) The Laplacian pyramid as a compact image code. IEEE Trans Commun 31:482–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cohen A, Daubechies I, Feauveau, JC (1992) Biorthogonal bases of compactly supported wavelets. Commun Pure Appl Math 45:485–560MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Daubechies I (1992) Ten lectures on wavelets. SIAM, PhiladelphiaMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Donoho DL (1995) De-noising by soft-thresholding. IEEE Trans Inform Theory, 41(3): 613–627MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Donoho DL; Johnstone IM (1995) Adapting to unknown smoothness via wavelet shrinkage. J Am Stat Assoc 90(432):1200–1244MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fu S, Muralikrishnan, Raja J (2003) Engineering surface analysis with different wavelet bases. ASME J Manuf Sci Eng 125(6):844–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gao R, Yan R (2006) Non-stationary signal processing for bearing health monitoring. Int J Manuf Res 1(1):18–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Haar A (1910) Zur theorie der orthgonalen funktionensysteme. Math Annalen 69:331–371MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kim JS, Lee JH, Kim JH, Baek J, Kim SS (2010) Fault detection of cycle-based signals using wavelet transform in FAB processes. Int J Precision Eng Manuf 11(2):237–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lou X, Loparo KA (2004) Bearing fault diagnosis based on wavelet transform and fuzzy inference. Mech Syst Signal Process 18:1077–1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mallat SG (1989a) A theory of multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell 11(7) 674–693MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mallat SG (1989b) Multiresolution approximations and wavelet orthonormal bases of L2(R). Trans Am Math Soc 315:69–87MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Mallat SG (1998) A wavelet tour of signal processing. Academic, San Diego, CAMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Nikolaou NG, Antoniadis IA (2002) Rolling element bearing fault diagnosis using wavelet packets. NDT&E Int 35:197–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rafiee J, Rafiee MA, Tse PW (2010) Application of mother wavelet functions for automatic gear and bearing fault diagnosis. Expert Syst Appl 37:4568–4579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shakher C, Ishtiaque SM, Singh SK, Zaidi HN (2004) Application of wavelet transform in characterization of fabric texture. J Text Inst 95(1–6):107–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sugumaran V, Ramachandran KI (2009) Wavelet selection using decision tree for fault diagnosis of roller bearings. Int J Appl Eng Res 4(2):201–225Google Scholar
  20. Witkin A (1983) Scale space filtering. In: Proceedings of international joint conference on artificial intelligence, Karlsruhe, Germany, pp 1019–1023Google Scholar
  21. Zhou SY, Sun BC, Shi JJ (2006) An SPC monitoring system for cycle-based waveform signals using haar transform. IEEE Trans Automat Sci Eng 3(1):60–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA
  2. 2.School of Instrument Science and EngineeringSoutheast UniversityNanjingChina, People’s Republic

Personalised recommendations