Methodological Approach to Assessing the Evidence

Chapter

Abstract

The approach taken in this book to guide authors in assessing the evidence for their respective topic areas was generated by the editors. It represents a combination of current recommendations for describing the state of public health evidence, assessing the quality of that evidence, including the suitability of the various studies reviewed to assess the effectiveness of their respective interventions, along with a good dose of practicality.

Keywords

Perinatal Outcome Ethnic Disparity Public Health Practice Perinatal Depression Critical Appraisal Skill Program 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Beck, C. T. (1993). Qualitative research: the evaluation of its credibility, fittingness, and auditability. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 15(2), 263–266.Google Scholar
  2. Briss, P. A., Zaza, S., Pappaioanou, M., Fielding, J., Wright-De Agüero, L., Truman, B. I., et al. (2000). Developing an evidence-based guide to community preventive services-methods. The Task Force on Community Preventive Services. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 18(Suppl. 1), 35–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP). (2002). Milton Keynes Primary Care Trust.Google Scholar
  4. Downs, S. H., & Black, N. (1998). The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomized and non-randomized studies of health care interventions. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 52, 377–387.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2002). Qualitative data analysis, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  6. Rychetnik, L., & Frommer, M. (2002). A schema for evaluating evidence on public health interventions V.4. National Public Health Partnership, University of Sydney, April 2002Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer US 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Public Health, Community Health SciencesUniversity of IllinoisChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations