Skip to main content

Sources of Error in Clinical Epidemiology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
An Introduction to Epidemiology for Health Professionals

Part of the book series: Springer Series on Epidemiology and Public Health ((SSEH,volume 1))

  • 3566 Accesses

Abstract

Within the field of clinical epidemiology bias is always a concern and the field is plagued by studies which have not taken this into account. Lack of insights in problems caused by confounding by indication, differential misclassification of exposure, differential misclassification of outcome, and selection bias have resulted in premature claims of causality. However, it is fair to say that during the last decade there has been a growing awareness of the problems, but it is still too easy to find many examples of a suboptimal study design where bias has led to wrong results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lagergren J, Ye W, Ekbom A. Intestinal cancer after cholecystectomy: is bile involved in carcinogenesis? Gastroenterology 2001;121(3):542–547.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ye W, Lagergren J, Nyrén O, Ekbom A. Risk of pancreatic cancer after cholecystectomy: a cohort study in Sweden. Gut 2001;49(5):678–681.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rosenberg L, Palmer JR, Zauber AG, Warshauer ME, Stolley PD, Shapiro S. Vasectomy and the risk of prostate cancer. Am J Epidemiol 1990;132(6):1051–1055.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Giovannucci E, Tosteson TD, Speizer FE, Ascherio A, Vessey MP, Colditz GA. A retrospective cohort study of vasectomy and prostate cancer in US men. JAMA 1993;269(7):878–882.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Giovannucci E, Ascherio A, Rimm EB, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC. A prospective cohort study of vasectomy and prostate cancer in US men. JAMA 1993;269(7):873–877.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lynge E. Prostate cancer is not increased in men with vasectomy in Denmark. J Urol 2002;168(2):488–490.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Daling JR, Malone KE, Voigt LF, White E, Weiss NS. Risk of breast cancer among young women: relationship to induced abortion. J Natl Cancer Inst 1994;86(21):1584–1592.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rookus MA, van Leeuwen FE. Induced abortion and risk for breast cancer: reporting (recall) bias in a Dutch case-control study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996;88(23):1759–1764.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Melbye M, Wohlfartht J, Olsen JH, Frisch M, Westergaard T, Helweg-Larsen K, Andersen PK. Induced abortion and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1997;336(2):81–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Geborek P, Bladström A, Turesson C, Gulfe A, Petersson IF, Saxne T, Olsson H, Jacobsson LT. Tumour necrosis factor blockers do not increase overall tumour risk in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, but may be associated with an increased risk of lymphomas. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64(5):699–703.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Askling J, Baecklund E, Granath F, Geborek P, Fored M, Backlin C, Bertilsson L, Cöster L, Jacobsson LT, Lindblad S, Lysholm J, Rantapää-Dahlqvist S, Saxne T, van Vollenhoven R, Klareskog L, Feltelius N. Anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy in rheumatoid arthritis and risk of malignant lymphomas: relative risks and time trends in the Swedish Biologics Register. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68(5):648–653.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jørn Olsen .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Olsen, J., Christensen, K., Murray, J., Ekbom, A. (2010). Sources of Error in Clinical Epidemiology. In: An Introduction to Epidemiology for Health Professionals. Springer Series on Epidemiology and Public Health, vol 1. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1497-2_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1497-2_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-1496-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-1497-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics