Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gender, Spatial Abilities, and Wayfinding

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Handbook of Gender Research in Psychology

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, G. M., & Evardone, M. (2008). Blocks and bodies: Sex differences in a novel version of the Mental Rotations Test. Hormones and Behavior, 53, 177–184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, G. M., Packard, M. G., & Peterson, B. S. (2002). Sex and spatial position effects on object location memory following intentional learning of object identities. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1516–1522.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, G. L. (2000). Men and women, maps and minds: Cognitive bases of sex-related differences in reading and interpreting maps. In S. Ó. Nuallàin (Ed.), Spatial cognition: Foundations and applications (pp. 3–18). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, G. L., Kirasic, K. C., Dobson, S. H., Long, R. G., & Beck, S. (1996). Predicting environmental learning from spatial abilities: An indirect route. Intelligence, 22, 327–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amponsah, B. (2000). A comparison of sex differences in visual-spatial performance from preadolescence to adulthood in Ghana and Norway. African Journal of Psychology, 30, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annett, M. (1992). Spatial ability in subgroups of left- and right-handers. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 493–515.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Astur, R. S., Ortiz, M. L., & Sutherland, R. J. (1998). A characterization of performance by men and women in a virtual Morris water task: A large and reliable sex difference. Behavioural Brain Research, 93, 185–190.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Astur, R. S., Tropp, J., Sava, S., Constable, R. T., & Markus, E. J. (2004). Sex differences and correlations in a virtual Morris water task, a virtual radial arm maze, and mental rotation. Behavioural Brain Research, 151, 103–115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baenninger, M., & Newcombe, N. S. (1989). The role of experience in spatial test performance: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 20, 327–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkley, C. L., & Gabriel, K. I. (2007). Sex differences in cue perception in a visual scene: Investigation of cue type. Behavioral Neuroscience, 121, 291–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barnfield, A. M. C. (1999). Development of sex differences in spatial memory. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 89, 339–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsky, R. D., & Lachman, M. E. (1986). Understanding of horizontality in college women: Effects of two training procedures. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 9, 31–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, W. W., & Tröster, A. I. (1987). Gender differences in geographical knowledge. Sex Roles, 16, 565–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, W. W., & Tröster, A. I. (1988). Neuropsychology of spatial memory. In H. A. Whitaker (Ed.), Contemporary reviews in neuropsychology (pp. 77–108). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, B. J., & Hedges, L. V. (1984). Meta-analysis of cognitive gender differences: A comment on an analysis by Rosenthal and Rubin. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 583–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, M. W., & Pashler, H. (2002). Volatile visual representations: Failing to detect changes in recently processed information. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 744–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bein, F. L. (1990). Baseline geography competency test: Administered in Indiana universities. Journal of Geography, 89, 260–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, G. K., Seashore, H. G., & Wesman, A. G. (1947). Differential aptitude tests. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J. W. (1966). Temne and Eskimo perceptual skills. International Journal of Psychology, 1, 207–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berthiaume, F., Robert, M., St-Onge, R., & Pelletier, J. (1993). Absence of a gender difference in a haptic version of the water-level task. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 57–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanch, R. J., Brennan, D., Condon, B., Santosh, C., & Hadley, D. (2004). Are there gender-specific neural substrates of route learning from different perspectives? Cerebral Cortex, 14, 1207–1213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, K. J. (1982). Personality correlates of sense of direction and geographic orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1318–1324.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burkitt, J., Widman, D., & Saucier, D. M. (2007). Evidence for the influence of testosterone in the performance of spatial navigation in a virtual water maze in women but not in men. Hormones and Behavior, 51, 649–654.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cánovas, R., Espínola, M., Iribarne, L., & Cimadevilla, J. M. (2008). A new virtual task to evaluate human place learning. Behavioural Brain Research, 190, 112–118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, P. J., MacPherson, G. M., & Tobin, P. (1985). Do sex-related differences in spatial abilities exist? A multilevel critique with new data. American Psychologist, 40, 786–799.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Casey, M. B. (1996). Understanding individual differences in spatial ability within females: A nature/nurture interactionist framework. Developmental Review, 16, 241–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casey, M. B., & Brabeck, M. M. (1989). Exceptions to the male advantage on a spatial task: Family handedness and college major as factors identifying women who excel. Neuropsychologia, 27, 689–696.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Casey, M. B., & Brabeck, M. M. (1990). Women who excel on a spatial task: Proposed genetic and environmental factors. Brain and Cognition, 12, 73–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Casey, M. B., Colön, D., & Goris, Y. (1992). Family handedness as a predictor of mental rotation ability among minority girls in a math-science training program. Brain and Cognition, 18, 88–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Casey, M. B., Erkut, S., Ceder, I., & Young, J. M. (2008). Use of a storytelling context to improve girls’ and boys’ geometry skills in kindergarten. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 29–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casey, M. B., Nuttall, R. L., & Pezaris, E. (1997). Mediators of gender differences in mathematics college entrance test scores: A comparison of spatial skills with internalized beliefs and anxieties. Developmental Psychology, 33, 669–680.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Casey, M. B., Nuttall, R. L., & Pezaris, E. (1999). Evidence in support of a model that predicts how biological and environmental factors interact to influence spatial skills. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1237–1247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Casey, M. B., Nuttall, R. L., & Pezaris, E. (2001). Spatial-mechanical reasoning skills versus mathematical self-confidence as mediators of gender differences on mathematics subtests using cross-national gender-based items. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 28–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casey, M. B., Nuttall, R. L., Pezaris, E., & Benbow, C. P. (1995). The influence of spatial ability on gender differences in mathematics college entrance test scores across diverse samples. Developmental Psychology, 31, 697–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casey, M. B., Winner, E., Brabeck, M. M., & Sullivan, K. (1990). Visual-spatial abilities in art, math, and science majors: Effects of sex, family handedness, and spatial experience. In K. J. Gilhooly, M. T. G. Keane, R. H. Logie, & G. Erdos (Eds.), Lines of thinking: Reflections on the psychology of thought (vol. 2, pp. 275–294). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerone, L. J., & McKeever, W. F. (1998). Mental rotation test performances and familial sinistrality in dextrals, with special reference to the bent twig theory. Learning and Individual Differences, 10, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chabanne, V., Péruch, P., & Thinus-Blanc, C. (2004). Sex differences and women’s hormonal cycle effects on spatial performance in a virtual environment navigation task. Current Psychology of Cognition, 22, 351–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, K. T., & Antes, J. R. (1987). Sex and cultural differences in map reading. American Cartographer, 14, 29–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charleston, S. I. (2008). The International Wayfinding Strategy scale: Evidence for cross-cultural use with as sample from the UK. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 106, 881–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherney, I. D., & Collaer, M. L. (2005). Sex differences in line judgment: Relation to mathematics preparation and strategy use. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 100, 615–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherney, I. D., & Neff, N. L. (2004). Role of strategies and prior exposure in mental rotation. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 98, 1269–1282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiarello, C., McMahon, M. A., & Schaefer, K. (1989). Visual cerebral lateralization over phases of the menstrual cycle: A preliminary investigation. Brain and Cognition, 11, 18–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J., & L’Hirondelle, N. (2005). Object location memory: A direct test of the verbal memory hypothesis. Learning and Individual Differences, 15, 237–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J., McKillop, E., Ward, M., & L’Hirondelle, N. (2006). Sex-specific relationships between route-learning strategies and abilities in a large-scale environment. Environment and Behavior, 38, 791–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J., & Silverman, I. (2003). Processes underlying sex differences in route-learning strategies in children and adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1153–1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collaer, M. L., & Hill, E. M. (2006). Large sex difference in adolescents on a timed line judgment task: Attentional contributors and task relationship to mathematics. Perception, 35, 561–572.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collaer, M. L., & Nelson, J. D. (2002). Large visuospatial sex difference in line judgment: Possible role of attentional factors. Brain and Cognition, 49, 1–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, D. W., & Kimura, D. (1997). A large sex difference on a two-dimensional mental rotation task. Behavioral Neuroscience, 111, 845–849.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coluccia, E., Bosco, A., & Brandimonte, M. A. (2007). The role of visuo-spatial working memory in map learning: New findings from a map drawing paradigm. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 71, 359–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contreras, M. J., Colom, R., Shih, P. C., Álava, M. J., & Santacreu, J. (2001). Dynamic spatial performance: Sex and educational differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 117–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contreras, M. J., Rubio, V. J., Peña, D., Colom, R., & Santacreu, J. (2007). Sex differences in dynamic spatial ability: The unsolved question of performance factors. Memory & Cognition, 35, 297–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, M., Herrmann, D. J., Holdsworth, M. J., Randall, E. P., & Robbins, D. (1989). Gender and beliefs about memory. British Journal of Psychology, 80, 391–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutmore, T. R. H., Hine, T. J., Maberly, K. J., Langford, N. M., & Hawgood, G. (2000). Cognitive and gender factors influencing navigation in a virtual environment. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53, 223–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dabbs, J. M., Jr., Chang, E. L., Strong, R. A., & Milun, R. (1998). Spatial ability, navigation strategy, and geographic knowledge among men and women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 89–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Lisi, R., & Wolford, J. L. (2002). Improving children’s mental rotation accuracy with computer game playing. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163, 272–282.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Devlin, A. S., & Bernstein, J. (1995). Interactive wayfinding: Use of cues by men and women. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 23–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devlin, A. S., & Bernstein, J. (1997). Interactive way-finding: Map style and effectiveness. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17, 99–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duff, S. J., & Hampson, E. (2001). A sex differences on a novel spatial working memory task in humans. Brain and Cognition, 47, 470–493.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eals, M., & Silverman, I. (1994). The hunter-gatherer theory of spatial sex differences: Proximate factors mediating the female advantage in recall of object arrays. Ethology & Sociobiology, 15, 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ecuyer-Dab, I., & Robert, M. (2004a). Have sex differences in spatial ability evolved from male competition for mating and female concern for survival? Cognition, 91, 221–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecuyer-Dab, I., & Robert, M. (2004b). Spatial ability and home-range size: Examining the relationship in western men and women (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 118, 217–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecuyer-Dab, I., & Robert, M. (2007). The female advantage in object location memory according to the foraging hypothesis: A critical analysis. Human Nature, 18, 365–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, S. B., Levine, S. C., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2006). The importance of gesture in children’s spatial reasoning. Developmental Psychology, 42, 1259–1268.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eve, R. A., Price, B., & Counts, M. (1994). Geographic illiteracy among college students. Youth & Society, 25, 408–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feingold, A. (1988). Cognitive gender differences are disappearing. American Psychologist, 43, 95–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feingold, A. (1993). Cognitive gender differences: A developmental perspective. Sex Roles, 29, 91–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, J., Spence, I., & Pratt, J. (2007). Playing an action video game reduces gender differences in spatial cognition. Psychological Science, 18, 850–855.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fennema, E. (1975). Spatial ability, mathematics, and the sexes. In E. Fennema (Ed.), Mathematics learning: What research says about sex differences (pp. 33–43). Columbus, OH: ERIC Center for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fields, A. W., & Shelton, A. L. (2006). Individual skill differences and large-scale environmental learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 506–515.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galea, L. A., & Kimura, D. (1993). Sex differences in route-learning. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 53–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaulin, S. J., & FitzGerald, R. W. (1989). Sexual selection for spatial-learning ability. Animal Behaviour, 37, 322–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaulin, S. J., FitzGerald, R. W., & Wartell, M. S. (1990). Sex differences in spatial ability and activity in two vole species (Microtus ochrogaster and M. pennsylvanicus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 104, 88–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. C. (1995). Sexual selection and sex differences in spatial cognition. Learning and Individual Differences, 7, 289–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. C., Saults, S. J., Liu, F., & Hoard, M. K. (2000). Sex differences in spatial cognition, computational fluency, and arithmetical reasoning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 337–353.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, J. F., & Litwiller, R. M. (2005). Spatial working memory and gender differences in science. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 32, 49–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmartin, P. P. (1986). Maps, mental imagery, and gender in the recall of geographical information. The American Cartographer, 13, 335–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glück, J., & Fitting, S. (2003). Spatial strategy selection: Interesting incremental information. International Journal of Testing, 3, 293–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, D., Haldane, D., & Mitchell, C. (1990). Sex differences in visual-spatial ability: The role of performance factors. Memory & Cognition, 18, 546–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grön, G., Wunderlich, A. P., Spitzer, M., Tomczak, R., & Riepe, M. W. (2000). Brain activation during human navigation: Gender-different neural networks as substrate of performance. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 404–408.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gur, R. C., Alsop, D., Glahn, D., Petty, R., Swanson, C. L., Maldjian, J. A., et al. (2000). An fMRI study of sex differences in regional activation to a verbal and a spatial task. Brain and Language, 74, 157–170.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halari, R., Hines, M., Kumari, V., Mehrotra, R., Wheeler, M., Ng, V., et al. (2005). Sex differences and individual differences in cognitive performance and their relationship to endogenous gonadal hormones and gonadotropins. Behavioral Neuroscience, 119, 104–117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F., & Tan, U. (2001). Stereotypes and steroids: Using a psychobiosocial model to understand cognitive sex differences. Brain and Cognition, 45, 392–414.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F., & Wright, T. M. (1996). A process-oriented model of cognitive sex differences. Learning & Individual Differences, 8, 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampson, E. (1990a). Estrogen-related variations in human spatial and articulatory-motor skills. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 15, 97–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampson, E. (1990b). Variations in sex-related cognitive abilities across the menstrual cycle. Brain and Cognition, 14, 26–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampson, E., & Kimura, D. (1988). Reciprocal effects of hormonal fluctuations on human motor and perceptual-spatial skills. Behavioral Neuroscience, 102, 456–459.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hand, L. L., Uttal, D. H., Marulis, L., Newcombe, N. S., Warren, C., & Lewis, A. A meta-analysis of training effects on spatial skills: What works, for whom, and why? (under review).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrell, W. A., Bowlby, J. W., & Hall-Hoffarth, D. (2000). Directing wayfinders with maps: The effects of gender, age, route complexity, and familiarity with the environment. Journal of Social Psychology, 140, 169–178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, R. (1979). Children’s experience of place. Oxford: Irvington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, M., Montello, D. R., Richardson, A. E., Ishikawa, T., & Lovelace, K. (2006). Spatial abilities at different scales: Individual differences in aptitude-test performance and spatial-layout learning. Intelligence, 34, 151–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heil, M., & Jansen-Osmann, P. (2008). Sex differences in mental rotation with polygons of different complexity: Do men utilize holistic processes, whereas women prefer piecemeal ones? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 683–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrie, R. L., Aron, R. H., Nelson, B. D., & Poole, D. A. (1997). Gender-related knowledge variations within geography. Sex Roles, 36, 605–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, J. F., Heins, J. A., & Cohen, D. S. (1987). Children’s spatial knowledge of their neighborhood environment. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 8, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, J. F., Kail, R. V., & Siegel, A. W. (1979). Cognitive maps of a college campus: A new look at freshman orientation. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 13, 183–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, D. J., Crawford, M., & Holdsworth, M. (1992). Gender-linked differences in everyday memory performance. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 221–231.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hines, M. (2007). Do sex differences in cognition cause the shortage of women in science? In S. J. Ceci & W. M. Williams (Eds.), Why aren’t more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 101–112). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Holding, C. S. (1992). Clusters of reference points in cognitive representations of the environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holding, C. S., & Holding, D. H. (1989). Acquisition of route network knowledge by males and females. Journal of General Psychology, 116, 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hugdahl, K., Thomsen, T., & Ersland, L. (2006). Sex differences in visuo-spatial processing: An fMRI study of mental rotation. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1575–1583.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S. (1981). How large are cognitive gender differences? A meta-analysis using ω² and d. American Psychologist, 36, 892–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iachini, T., Sergi, I., Ruggiero, G., & Gnisci, A. (2005). Gender differences in object location memory in real three-dimensional environment. Brain and Cognition, 59, 52–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Isgor, C., & Sengelaub, D. R. (1998). Prenatal gonadal steroids affect adult spatial behavior, CA1 and CA3 pyramidal cell morphology in rats. Hormones and Behavior, 34, 183–198.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, L. F., & Schenk, F. (2003). Unpacking the cognitive map: The parallel map theory of hippocampal function. Psychological Review, 110, 285–315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • James, T. W., & Kimura, D. (1997). Sex differences in remembering the locations of objects in an array: Location-shifts versus location-exchanges. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 155–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen-Osmann, P., & Wiedenbauer, G. (2004). The representation of landmarks and routes in children and adults: A study in a virtual environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 347–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. W., McKenzie, K. J., & Hamm, J. P. (2002). Cerebral asymmetry for mental rotation: Effects of response hand, handedness, and gender. Neuroreport, 13, 1929–1932.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jonasson, Z. (2005). Meta-analysis of sex differences in rodent models of learning and memory: A review of behavioral and biological data. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 28, 811–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. M., Braithwaite, V. A., & Healy, S. D. (2003). The evolution of sex differences in spatial ability. Behavioral Neuroscience, 117, 403–411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, K., Wüstenberg, T., Heinze, H. J., Peters, M., & Jäncke, L. (2002). Women and men exhibit different cortical activation patterns during mental rotation tasks. Neuropsychologia, 40, 2397–2408.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic, J., & Lerner, R. M. (1994). Individual-contextual relationships and mathematics performance: Comparing American and Serbian young adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 14, 449–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kail, R., Carter, P., & Pellegrino, J. W. (1979). The locus of sex differences in spatial ability. Perception & Psychophysics, 26, 182–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kass, S. J., Ahlers, R. H., & Dugger, M. (1998). Eliminating gender differences through practice in an applied visual spatial task. Human Performance, 11, 337–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, S. B. (2007). Sex differences in mental rotation and spatial visualization ability: Can they be accounted for by differences in working memory capacity? Intelligence, 35, 211–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, D. M., & Bischof, W. F. (2005). Reorienting in images of a three-dimensional environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 1391–1403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kempel, P., Gohlke, B., Klempau, J., Zinsberger, P., Reuter, M., & Hennig, J. (2005). Second-to-fourth digit length, testosterone, and spatial ability. Intelligence, 33, 215–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kersker, J. L., Epley, M. L., & Wilson, J. F. (2003). Sex differences in landmark learning by children aged 5–12 years. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 96, 329–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, B. L., Towle, E., O’Brien, E. J., & Bauer, C. F. (2008). Analysis of self-efficacy and ability related to spatial tasks and the effect on retention for students in engineering. International Journal of Engineering Education, 24, 488–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korol, D. L., & Kolo, L. L. (2002). Estrogen-induced changes in place and response learning in young adult female rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 116, 411–420.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Korol, D. L., Malin, E. L., Borden, K. A., Busby, R. A., & Couper-Leo, J. (2004). Shifts in preferred learning strategy across the estrous cycle in female rats. Hormones and Behavior, 45, 330–338.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, G. A., & Smith, R. M. (2001). An investigation of gender differences in the components influencing the difficulty of spatial ability items. Journal of Applied Measurement, 2, 65–77.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlman, J. S., & Beitel, P. A. (1991). Videogame experience: A possible explanation for differences in anticipation of coincidence. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 72, 483–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyllonen, P. C., Lohman, D. F., & Woltz, D. J. (1984). Componential modeling of alternative strategies for performing spatial tasks. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1325–1345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lajoie, S. P. (2003). Individual differences in spatial ability: Developing technologies to increase strategy awareness and skills. Educational Psychologist, 38, 115–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambrey, S., & Berthoz, A. (2007). Gender differences in the use of external landmarks versus spatial representations updated by self-motion. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 6, 379–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Law, D. J., Pellegrino, J. W., & Hunt, E. B. (1993). Comparing the tortoise and the hare: Gender differences and experience in dynamic spatial reasoning tasks. Psychological Science, 4, 35–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, D. J., Pellegrino, J. W., Mitchell, S. R., Fischer, S. C., McDonald, T. P., & Hunt, E. B. (1993). Perceptual and cognitive factors governing performance in comparative arrival-time judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1183–1199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, C. A. (1994). Gender differences in way-finding strategies: Relationship to spatial ability and spatial anxiety. Sex Roles, 30, 765–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, C. A. (1996). Strategies for indoor wayfinding: The role of orientation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 137–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, C. A. (2001). Gender and regional differences in spatial referents used in direction giving. Sex Roles, 44, 321–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, C. A., & Kallai, J. (2002). Gender differences in wayfinding strategies and anxiety about wayfinding: A cross-cultural comparison. Sex Roles, 47, 389–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, C. A., & Morrin, K. A. (1999). Gender differences in pointing accuracy in computer-simulated 3D mazes. Sex Roles, 40, 73–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, S. C., Huttenlocher, J., Taylor, A., & Langrock, A. (1999). Early sex differences in spatial skill. Developmental Psychology, 35, 940–949.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, S. C., Vasilyeva, M., Lourenco, S. F., Newcombe, N. S., & Huttenlocher, J. (2005). Socioeconomic status modifies the sex difference in spatial skill. Psychological Science, 16, 841–845.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, L. J., Astur, R. S., & Frick, K. M. (2005). Men and women differ in object memory but not performance of a virtual radial maze. Behavioral Neuroscience, 119, 853–862.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, C., Wolgers, G., & Herlitz, A. (2001). Sex differences favoring women in verbal but not in visuospatial episodic memory. Neuropsychology, 15, 165–173.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liben, L. S. (1978). Performance on Piagetian spatial tasks as a function of sex, field dependence, and training. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 24, 97–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liben, L. S. (2006). Education for spatial thinking. In K. A. Renninger, I. E. Sigel, W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (6th ed., vol. 4, pp. 197–247). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liben, L. S., & Golbeck, S. L. (1980). Sex differences in performance on Piagetian spatial tasks: Differences in competence or performance? Child Development, 51, 594–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liben, L. S., & Golbeck, S. L. (1984). Performance on Piagetian horizontality and verticality tasks: Sex-related differences in knowledge of relevant physical phenomena. Developmental Psychology, 20, 595–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liben, L. S., Susman, E. J., Finkelstein, J. W., Chinchilli, V. M., Kunselman, S., Schwab, J., et al. (2002). The effects of sex steroids on spatial performance: A review and an experimental clinical investigation. Developmental Psychology, 38, 236–253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479–1498.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loring-Meier, S., & Halpern, D. F. (1999). Sex differences in visuospatial working memory: Components of cognitive processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 464–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lövdén, M., Hellitz, A., Schellenbach, M., Grossman-Hunter, B., Kruger, A., & Lindenberger, U. (2007). Quantitative and qualitative sex differences in spatial navigation. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 48, 353–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacFadden, A., Elias, L., & Saucier, D. (2003). Males and females scan maps similarly, but give directions differently. Brain and Cognition, 53, 297–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski, J. C., & Gillespie, W. T. (2001). Individual differences in performance on a large-scale, real-world wayfinding task. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 73–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, V. A., Sasanuma, S., Sakuma, N., & Masaki, S. (1990). Sex differences in cognitive abilities: A cross-cultural perspective. Neuropsychologia, 28, 1063–1077.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Massa, L. J., Mayer, R. E., & Bohon, L. M. (2005). Individual differences in gender role beliefs influence spatial ability test performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 15, 99–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masters, M. S. (1998). The gender difference on the Mental Rotations Test is not due to performance factors. Memory & Cognition, 26, 444–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, M. S., & Sanders, B. (1993). Is the gender difference in mental rotation disappearing? Behavior Genetics, 23, 337–341.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. H. (1986). Gender, graphicacy, and geography. Educational Review, 38, 259–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBurney, D. H., Gaulin, S. J. C., Devineni, T., & Adams, C. (1997). Superior spatial memory of women: Stronger evidence for the gathering hypothesis. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 165–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGlone, J. (1980). Sex differences in human brain asymmetry: A critical survey. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 215–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGlone, M. S., & Aronson, J. (2006). Stereotype threat, identity salience, and spatial reasoning. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 27, 486–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meehan, A. M., & Overton, W. F. (1986). Gender differences in expectancies for success and performance on Piagetian spatial tasks. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 32, 427–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, C., Green, R., Sanders, G., & Hines, M. (1998). Estrogen and memory in a transsexual population. Hormones and Behavior, 34, 199–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L. K., & Santoni, V. (1986). Sex differences in spatial abilities: Strategic and experiential correlates. Acta Psychologica, 62, 225–235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moody, M. S. (1997). Changes in scores on the Mental Rotations Test during the menstrual cycle. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 84, 955–961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D. S., & Johnson, S. P. (2008). Mental rotation in human infants: A sex difference. Psychological Science, 19, 1063–1066.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Newcombe, N. S. (2007). Taking science seriously: Straight thinking about spatial sex differences. In S. J. Ceci & W. M. Williams (Eds.), Why aren’t more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 69–77). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Newcombe, N. S., & Dubas, J. S. (1992). A longitudinal study of predictors of spatial ability in adolescent females. Child Development, 63, 37–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Newcombe, N. S., Mathason, L., & Terlecki, M. (2002). Maximization of spatial competence: More important than finding the cause of sex differences. In A. McGillicuddy-De Lisi & R. De Lisi (Eds.), Biology, society, and behavior: The development of sex differences in cognition (pp. 183–206). Westport, CT: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newhouse, P., Newhouse, C., & Astur, R. S. (2007). Sex differences in visual-spatial learning using a virtual water maze in pre-pubertal children. Behavioural Brain Research, 183, 1–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Newson, J., & Newson, E. (1987). Family and sex roles in middle childhood. In D. J. Hargreaves & A. M. Colley (Eds.), The psychology of sex roles (pp. 142–158). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohnishi, T., Matsuda, H., Hirakata, M., & Ugawa, Y. (2006). Navigation ability dependent neural activation in the human brain: An fMRI study. Neuroscience Research, 55, 361–369.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ozel, S., Molinaro, C., & Larue, J. (2001). Influence of sport on gender differences in spatial imagery. Homeostasis in Health and Disease, 41, 169–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parameswaran, G. (1995). Gender differences in horizontality performance before and after training. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 156, 105–113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parameswaran, G. (2003). Age, gender, and training in children’s performance of Piaget’s horizontality task. Educational Studies, 29, 307–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parameswaran, G., & De Lisi, R. (1996). Improvements in horizontality performance as a function of type of training. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 82, 595–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, J., Carter, G., Butler, S., Slykhuis, D., & Reid-Griffin, A. (2008). Re-dimensional thinking in Earth science: From 3-D virtual reality panoramas to 2-D contour maps. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19, 75–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. D., Larson, P., Kratz, K., Thiebaux, M., Bluestein, B., Buckwalter, J. G., et al. (2004). Sex differences in mental rotation and spatial rotation in a virtual environment. Neuropsychologia, 42, 555–562.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peña, D., Contreras, M. J., Shih, P. C., & Santacreu, J. (2008). Solution strategies as possible explanations of individual and sex differences in a dynamic spatial task. Acta Psychologica, 128, 1–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M., Laeng, B., Latham, K., Jackson, M., Zaiyouna, R., & Richardson, C. (1995). A redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse Mental Rotations Test: Different versions and factors that affect performance. Brain and Cognition, 28, 39–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M., Manning, J., & Reimers, S. (2007). The effects of sex, sexual orientation, and digit ratio (2D:4D) on mental rotation performance. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 251–260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1956). The child’s conception of space (F. J. Langdon & J. L. Lunzer, Trans.). New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postma, A., Izendoorn, R., & De Haan, E. H. F. (1998). Sex differences in object location memory. Brain and Cognition, 36, 334–345.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Postma, A., Jager, G., Kessels, R. P. C., Koppeschaar, H. P. F., & van Honk, J. (2004). Sex differences for selective forms of spatial memory. Brain and Cognition, 54, 24–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Postma, A., Meyer, G., Tuiten, A., van Honk, J., Kessels, R. P. C., & Thijssen, J. (2000). Effects of testosterone administration on selective aspects of object-location memory in healthy young women. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 25, 563–575.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Postma, A., Winkel, J., Tuiten, A., & van Honk, J. (1999). Sex differences and menstrual cycle effects in human spatial memory. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 24, 175–192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prestopnik, J. L., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, B. (2000). The relations among wayfinding strategy use, sense of direction, sex, familiarity, and wayfinding ability. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puts, D. A., McDaniel, M. A., Jordan, C. L., & Breedlove, S. M. (2008). Spatial ability and prenatal androgens: Meta-analyses of congenital adrenal hyperplasia and digit ratio (2D:4D) studies. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 100–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quaiser-Pohl, C., & Lehmann, W. (2002). Girls’ spatial abilities: Charting the contributions of experiences and attitudes in different academic groups. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 245–260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, P. C., & Liben, L. S. (2008). A sex difference in mental rotation in young infants. Psychological Science, 19, 1067–1070.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rafi, A., Anuar, K., Samad, A., Hayati, M., & Mahadzir, M. (2005). Improving spatial ability using a web-based virtual environment (WbVE). Automation in Construction, 14, 707–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, Q., Abrahams, S., & Jussab, F. (2005). Sex differences in a human analogue of the radial arm maze: The “17-Box Maze Test.” Brain and Cognition, 58, 312–317.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reinking, R., Goldstein, G., & Houston, B. K. (1974). Cognitive style, proprioceptive skills, task set, stress, and the Rod-and-Frame Test of field orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 807–811.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rilea, S. L., Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., & Boles, D. (2004). Sex differences in spatial ability: A lateralization of function approach. Brain and Cognition, 56, 332–343.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robert, M., & Chevrier, E. (2003). Does men’s advantage in mental rotation persist when real three-dimensional objects are either felt or seen? Memory & Cognition, 31, 1136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert, M., & Harel, F. (1996). The gender difference in orienting liquid surfaces and plumb-lines: Its robustness, its correlates, and the associated knowledge of simple physics. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 280–314.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robert, M., & Héroux, G. (2004). Visuo-spatial play experience: Forerunner of visuo-spatial achievement in preadolescent and adolescent boys and girls? Infant and Child Development, 13, 49–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robert, M., & Longpré, S. (2005). Sensory and postural input in the occurrence of a gender difference in orienting liquid surfaces. Psychological Record, 55, 67–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert, M., & Morin, P. (1993). Gender differences in horizontality and verticality representation in relation to initial position of the stimuli. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 507–522.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robert, M., Pelletier, J., St-Onge, R., & Berthiaume, F. (1994). Women’s deficiency in water-level representation: Present in visual conditions yet absent in haptic contexts. Acta Psychologica, 87, 19–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robert, M., & Tremblay, S. (1992). Gender differences in water-level representation as a function of information on state of liquid. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 153, 231–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roof, R. L., & Havens, M. D. (1992). Testosterone improves maze performance and induces development of a male hippocampus in females. Brain Research, 572, 310–313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1982). Further meta-analytic procedures for assessing cognitive gender differences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 708–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. P., Skelton, R. W., & Mueller, S. C. (2006). Gender differences in spatial navigation in virtual space: Implications when using virtual environments in instruction and assessment. Virtual Reality, 10, 175–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandstrom, N. J., Kaufman, J., & Huettel, S. A. (1998). Males and females use different distal cues in a virtual environment navigation task. Cognitive Brain Research, 6, 351–360.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saucier, D., Bowman, M., & Elias, L. (2003). Sex differences in the effect of articulatory or spatial dual-task interference during navigation. Brain and Cognition, 53, 346–350.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saucier, D., Lisoway, A., Green, S., & Elias, L. (2007). Female advantage for object location memory in peripersonal but not extrapersonal space. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 13, 683–686.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saucier, D. M., Green, S. M., Leason, J., MacFadden, A., Bell, S., & Elias, L. J. (2002). Are sex differences in navigation caused by sexually dimorphic strategies or by differences in the ability to use the strategies? Behavioral Neuroscience, 116, 403–410.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saucier, D. M., Shultz, S. R., Keller, A. J., Cook, C. M., & Binsted, G. (2008). Sex differences in object location memory and spatial navigation in Long-Evans rats. Animal Cognition, 11, 129–137.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sharps, M. J., Price, J. L., & Williams, J. K. (1994). Spatial cognition and gender: Instructional and stimulus influences on mental image rotation performance. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 413–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharps, M. J., Welton, A. L., & Price, J. L. (1993). Gender and task in the determination of spatial cognitive performance. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 17, 71–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, D. L., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2001). Importance of assessing spatial ability in intellectually talented young adolescents: A 20-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 604–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, J. A. (1967). Problem of sex differences in space perception and aspects of intellectual functioning. Psychological Review, 74, 290–299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sholl, M. J., Acacio, J. C., Makar, R. O., & Leon, C. (2000). The relation of sex and sense of direction to spatial orientation in an unfamiliar environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha, A. B., & Mishra, R. C. (1996). Sex differences in cognitive style of Brahmin and Gurung children from the hills and plains of Nepal. In J. Pandey, D. Sinha, & D. P. Bhawuk (Eds.), Asian contributions to cross-cultural psychology (pp. 165–174). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Signorella, M. L., & Jamison, W. (1986). Masculinity, femininity, androgyny, and cognitive performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 207–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Signorella, M. L., Jamison, W., & Krupa, M. H. (1989). Predicting spatial performance from gender stereotyping in activity preferences and in self-concept. Developmental Psychology, 25, 89–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, I., & Choi, J. (2006). Non-Euclidean navigational strategies of women: Compensatory response or evolved dimorphism? Evolutionary Psychology, 4, 75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, I., Choi, J., Mackewn, A., Fisher, M., Moro, J., & Olshansky, E. (2000). Evolved mechanisms underlying wayfinding: Further studies on the hunter-gatherer theory of spatial sex differences. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 201–213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, I., Choi, J., & Peters, M. (2007). The hunter-gatherer theory of sex differences in spatial abilities: Data from 40 countries. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 261–268.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, I., & Eals, M. (1992). Sex differences in spatial abilities: Evolutionary theory and data. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 533–549). London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, I., & Phillips, K. (1993). “Effects of estrogen changes during the menstrual cycle on spatial performance”: Erratum. Ethology & Sociobiology, 14, 380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, I., Phillips, K., & Silverman, L. K. (1996). Homogeneity of effect sizes for sex across spatial tests and cultures: Implications for hormonal theories. Brain and Cognition, 31, 90–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, P. J., & Harris, L. J. (1996). Where in the world am I? Sex and handedness differences in knowledge of geography. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 82, 1379–1385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorby, S. A., & Baartmans, B. J. (2000). The development and assessment of a course for enhancing the 3-D spatial visualization skills of first year engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 89, 301–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spetch, M. L., & Parent, M. B. (2006). Age and sex differences in children’s spatial search strategies. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 807–812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stumpf, H. (1993). Performance factors and gender-related differences in spatial ability: Another assessment. Memory & Cognition, 21, 828–836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stumpf, H., & Klieme, E. (1989). Sex-related differences in spatial ability: More evidence for convergence. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 69, 915–921.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terlecki, M. S., & Newcombe, N. S. (2005). How important is the digital divide? The relation of computer and videogame usage to gender differences in mental rotation ability. Sex Roles, 53, 433–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terlecki, M. S., Newcombe, N. S., & Little, M. (2008). Durable and generalized effects of spatial experience on mental rotation: Gender differences in growth patterns. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 996–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, H., Jamison, W., & Hummel, D. D. (1973). Observation is insufficient for discovering that the surface of still water is invariantly horizontal. Science, 181, 173–174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen, T., Hugdahl, K., Ersland, L., Barndon, R., Lundervold, A., Smievoll, et al. (2000). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study of sex differences in a mental rotation task. Medical Science Monitor, 6, 1186–1196.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, T. G. (1958). Changing concepts of intelligence: Implications for test construction. In Proceedings of the 1956 Invitational conference on testing problems (pp. 26–37). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tlauka, M., Brolese, A., Pomeroy, D., & Hobbs, W. (2005). Gender differences in spatial knowledge acquired through simulated exploration of a virtual shopping centre. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 111–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay, L., Elliott, D., & Starkes, J. L. (2004). Gender differences in perception of self-orientation: Software or hardware? Perception, 33, 329–337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Goozen, S. H. M., Cohen-Kettenis, P. T., Gooren, L. J. G., Frijda, N. H., & van de Poll, N. E. (1995). Gender differences in behaviour: Activating effects of cross-sex hormones. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 20, 343–363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Goozen, S. H. M., Slabbekoorn, D., Gooren, L. J. G., Sanders, G., & Cohen-Kettenis, P. T. (2002). Organizing and activating effects of sex hormones in homosexual transsexuals. Behavioral Neuroscience, 116, 982–988.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 47, 599–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasta, R., & Gaze, C. E. (1996). Can spatial training erase the gender differences on the water-level task? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 549–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasta, R., Lightfoot, C., & Cox, B. D. (1993). Understanding gender differences on the water-level problem: The role of spatial perception. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39, 391–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasta, R., Rosenberg, D., Knott, J. A., & Gaze, C. E. (1997). Experience and the water-level task revisited: Does expertise exact a price? Psychological Science, 8, 336–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vecchi, T., & Girelli, L. (1998). Gender differences in visuo-spatial processing: The importance of distinguishing between passive storage and active manipulation. Acta Psychologica, 99, 1–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vederhus, L., & Krekling, S. (1996). Sex differences in visual spatial ability in 9-year-old children. Intelligence, 23, 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viaud-Delmon, I., Ivanenko, Y. P., Berthoz, A., & Jouvent, R. (1998). Sex, lies, and virtual reality. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 15–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Voyer, D., & Bryden, M. P. (1993). Masking and visual field effects on a lateralized rod-and-frame test. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 47, 26–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voyer, D., & Hou, J. (2006). Type of items and the magnitude of gender differences on the Mental Rotations Test. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 60, 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voyer, D., Nolan, C., & Voyer, S. (2000). The relation between experience and spatial performance in men and women. Sex Roles, 43, 891–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voyer, D., Postma, A., Brake, B., & Imperato-McGinley, J. (2007). Gender differences in object location memory: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 23–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250–270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waller, D., Knapp, D., & Hunt, E. (2001). Spatial representations of virtual mazes: The role of visual fidelity and individual differences. Human Factors, 43, 147–158.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, S. L., Newcombe, N. S., & Overton, W. F. (1986). Turn left at the church, or three miles north: A study of direction giving and sex differences. Environment and Behavior, 18, 192–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webley, P., & Whalley, A. (1987). Sex differences in children’s environmental cognition. Journal of Social Psychology, 127, 223–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1949). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children manual. Oxford: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1955). Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. Oxford: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. L., Barnett, A. M., & Meck, W. H. (1990). Organizational effects of early gonadal secretions on sexual differentiation in spatial memory. Behavioral Neuroscience, 104, 84–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. L., & Meck, W. H. (1991). The organizational effects of gonadal steroids on sexually dimorphic spatial ability. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 16, 155–176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Witkin, H. A., & Asch, S. E. (1948). Studies in space orientation III: Perception of the upright in the absence of a visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 603–614.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wittig, M. A., & Allen, M. J. (1984). Measurement of adult performance on Piaget’s water horizontality task. Intelligence, 8, 305–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wraga, M., Duncan, L., Jacobs, E. C., Helt, M., & Church, J. (2006). Stereotype susceptibility narrows the gender gap in imagined self-rotation performance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 813–819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R., Thompson, W. L., Ganis, G., Newcombe, N. S., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2008). Training generalized spatial skills. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 763–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zinser, O., Palmer, D. L., & Miller, C. R. (2004). Site distance, gender, and knowledge of geographic sites. Sex Roles, 51, 661–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zurkovsky, L., Brown, S. L., & Korol, D. L. (2006). Estrogen modulates place learning through estrogen receptors in the hippocampus. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 86, 336–343.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Indiana University-Purdue University, Fort Wayne, IN, USA

    Carol A. Lawton

Authors
  1. Carol A. Lawton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Connecticut College, Mohegan Avenue 270, New London, 06320, U.S.A.

    Joan C. Chrisler

  2. Elm Street 38, Toronto, M5G 2K5, Canada

    Donald R. McCreary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lawton, C.A. (2010). Gender, Spatial Abilities, and Wayfinding. In: Chrisler, J., McCreary, D. (eds) Handbook of Gender Research in Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1465-1_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation