Skip to main content

Gender in the Classroom

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Gender Research in Psychology

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Altermatt, E. R., Jovanovic, J., & Perry, M. (1998). Bias or responsivity? Sex and achievement-level effects on teachers’ classroom questioning practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 516–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Association of University Women [AAUW]. (2001a). Hostile hallways: Bullying, teasing, and sexual harassment in schools. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association of University Women [AAUW]. (2001b). Beyond the “gender wars:” A conversation about girls, boys, and education. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association of University Women [AAUW]. (2008). Where the girls are: The facts about gender equity in education. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bart, M. (1998). Creating a safer school for gay students. Counseling Psychology, 26, 36–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basow, S. A. (1992). Gender: Stereotypes and roles (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Thomson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basow, S. A. (1998). Student evaluations: The role of gender bias and teaching styles. In L. H. Collins, J. C. Chrisler, & K. Quina (Eds.), Arming Athena: Career strategies for women in academe (pp. 135–156). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basow, S. A. (2008). Gender socialization: Or, how long a way has baby come? In J. C. Chrisler, C. Golden, & P. D. Rozee (Eds.), Lectures on the psychology of women (4th ed., pp. 80–95). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basow, S. A., & Howe, K. G. (1980). Role model influence: Effects of sex and sex-role attitudes in college students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 4, 558–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basow, S. A., & Montgomery, S. (2005). Student evaluations of professors and professor self-ratings: Gender and divisional patterns. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 18, 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basow, S. A., Phelan, J., & Capotosto, L. (2006). Gender patterns in college students’ choices of their best and worst professors. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berenbaum, S. A., & Resnick, S. (2007). The seeds of career choices: Prenatal sex hormone effects on psychological sex differences. In S. J. Ceci & W. M. Williams (Eds.), Why aren’t more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 147–157). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bigler, R. S., & Liben, L. S. (2007). Developmental inter-group theory: Explaining and reducing children’s social stereotyping and prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 162–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, K. L., & Eisler, R. M. (1999). Sex and gender in the college classroom: A quantitative analysis of faculty-student interactions and perceptions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 127–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brannon, R. (1976). The male sex role: Our culture’s blueprint for manhood, and what it’s done for us lately. In D. David & R. Brannon (Eds.), The forty-nine percent majority (pp. 1–48). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bricheno, P., & Thornton, M. (2007). Role model, hero, or champion? Children’s views concerning role models. Educational Research, 49, 383–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canada, K., & Pringle, R. (1995). The role of gender in college classroom interactions: A social context approach. Sociology of Education, 68, 161–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (Eds.) (2007). Why aren’t more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles, M., & Bradley, K. (2002). Equal but separate: A cross-national study of sex segregation in higher education. American Sociological Review, 67, 573–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chavous, T. M., Harris, A., Rivas, D., Helaire, L., & Green, L. (2004). Racial stereotypes and gender in context: African Americans at predominantly Black and predominantly White colleges. Sex Roles, 51, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childs, G., & McKay, M. (2001). Boys starting school disadvantaged: Implications from teachers’ rating of behaviour and achievement in the first two years. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 303–314.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cloud, J. (2008, February 18). Prosecuting the gay teen murder. Time. Retrieved October 5, 2008 from http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1714214,00.html

  • Cokley, K. O. (2002). Ethnicity, gender, and academic self-concept: A preliminary examination of academic disidentification and implications for psychologists. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 8, 378–388.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, J., Warren, K., & Walsh, M. (2001). Classroom interactions: Gender of teacher, gender of student, and classroom subject. Sex Roles, 45, 579–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (2007). Is math a gift? Beliefs that put females at risk. In S. J. Ceci & W. M. Williams (Eds.), Why aren’t more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 47–55). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J., Jacobs, J., & Harold, R. (1990). Gender role stereotypes, expectancy effects, and parents’ socialization of gender differences. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 183–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espelage, D. L., Aragon, S. R., Birkett,, M., & Koenig, B. W. (2008). Homophobic teasing, psychological outcomes, and sexual orientation among high school students: What influence do parents and schools have? School Psychology Review, 37, 202–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fordham, S. (1996). Blacked out: Dilemmas of race, identity, and success at Capital High. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, S. L., & Smithson, I. (Eds.) (1990). Gender in the classroom: Power and pedagogy. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentry, M., Gable, R. K., & Rizza, M. G. (2002). Students’ perceptions of classroom activities: Are there grade-level and gender differences? Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 539–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gooden, A. M., & Gooden, M. A. (2001). Gender representation in notable children’s picture books: 1995–1999. Sex Roles, 45, 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodenow, C., Szalacha, L., & Westheimer, K. (2006). School support groups, other school factors, and the safety of sexual minority adolescents. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 573–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, L. (1985). Race-gender status, classroom interaction, and children’s socialization in elementary school. In L. C. Wilkinson & C. B. Marrett (Eds.), Gender influences in classroom interaction (pp. 57–77). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C., & Wilson, J. (2006). Teachers’ experiences of a single-sex initiative in a co-education school. Educational Studies, 32, 285–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gur, R. C., & Gur, R. E. (2007). Neural substrates for sex differences in cognition. In S. J. Ceci & W. M. Williams (Eds.), Why aren’t more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 189–198). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gurian, M., & Henley, P. [with Trueman, T.] (2001). Boys and girls learn differently! A guide for teachers and parents. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurian, M., & Stevens, K. (2005). The minds of boys: Saving our sons from falling behind in school and life. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haier, R. J. (2007). Brains, bias, and biology: Follow the data. In S. J. Ceci & W. M. Williams (Eds.), Why aren’t more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 113–119). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. R. (1995). Where is the child’s environment? A group socialization theory of development. Psychological Review, 102, 458–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L. (1997). The Metropolitan Life survey of the American teacher 1997: Examining gender issues in public schools. New York: Louis Harris and Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines, M. (2004). Brain gender. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huguet, P., & Régner, I. (2007). Stereotype threat among schoolgirls in quasi-ordinary classroom circumstances. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 545–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Inzlicht, M., & Ben-Zeev, T. A. (2000). A threatening intellectual environment: Why females are susceptible to experiencing problem-solving deficits in the presence of males. Psychological Science, 11, 365–371.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, C. (2002). Can single-sex classes in co-educational schools enhance the learning experiences of girls and/or boys? An exploration of pupils’ perceptions. British Educational Research Journal, 28, 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. C., Kahle, J. B., & Fargo, J. D. (2007). Effective teaching results in increased science achievement for all students. Science Education, 91, 371–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic, J., & King, S. S. (1998). Boys and girls in the performance-based science classroom: Who’s doing the performing? American Educational Research Journal, 35, 477–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehily, M. (2001). Bodies in school: Young men, embodiment, and heterosexual masculinities. Men & Masculinities, 4, 173–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, D. (1999). Sex and cognition. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kincheloe, J. L., & Hayes, K. (Eds.) (2007). Teaching city kids: Understanding and appreciating them. New York: Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J., & Gomez, G. (2007). The American college president: 2007 edition. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, J. (2003). Gender issues in the classroom. In W. M. Reynolds, & G. E. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Educational psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 259–281). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leaper, C., & Brown, C. S. (2008). Perceived experiences with sexism among adolescent girls. Child Development, 79, 685–704.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leaper, C., & Friedman, C. K. (2007). The socialization of gender. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 561–587). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenroot, R. K., Gogtay, N., Greenstein, D. K., Wells, E. M., Wallace, G. L., Clasen, L. S., et al. (2007). Sexual dimorphism of brain developmental trajectories during childhood and adolescence. NeuroImage, 36, 1065–1073.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, K. (2007). Should computing be taught in single-sex environments? An analysis of the computing learning environment of upper secondary students. Educational Studies, 33, 233–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E. (1998). The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Martin, A. J., & Cheng, J. H. S. (2008). A multilevel perspective on gender in classroom motivation and climate: Potential benefits of male teachers for boys? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 78–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martino, W., & Meyenn, B. (Eds.) (2001). What about the boys? Issues of masculinity in schools. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martino, W., & Meyenn, B. (2002). ‘War, guns and cool, tough things’: Interrogating single-sex classes as a strategy for engaging boys in English. Cambridge Journal of Education, 32, 303–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKown, C., & Weinstein, R. S. (2002). Modeling the role of child ethnicity and gender in children’s differential response to teacher expectations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 159–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meece, J. L., & Scantlebury, K. (2006). Gender and schooling: Progress and persistent barriers. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics [NCES]. (n.d.). Special analysis 2005: Mobility in the teacher workforce. Retrieved May 9, 2008 from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/2005/analysis/index.asp

  • National Center for Education Statistics [NCES]. (2005). Projection of education statistics to 2014. Retrieved May 9, 2008 from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/projections/projections2014/sec_4b.asp

  • National Center for Education Statistics [NCES]. (2007a). Digest of education statistics: 2006. Retrieved May 9, 2008 from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d06/tables/dt06_229.asp?referrer=report

  • National Center for Education Statistics [NCES]. (2007b). Contexts of elementary and secondary education: School characteristics and climate. Retrieved May 9, 2008 from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/2007/section4/indicator34.asp

  • National Center for Education Statistics [NCES]. (2008a). Digest of education statistics, Table 195. Retrieved May 9, 2008 from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d07/tables/dt07_195.asp

  • National Center for Education Statistics [NCES]. (2008b). Digest of education statistics, Table 105. Retrieved May 9, 2008 from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d07/tables/dt07_105.asp

  • Neal, L. V. I., McCray, A. D., Webb-Johnson, G., & Bridgest, S. T. (2003). The effects of African American movement styles on teachers’ perceptions and reactions. Journal of Special Education, 37, 49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nosek, B., Banaji, M., & Greenwald, A. (2002). Math = male, me = female, therefore math not-equal-to me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 44–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod, A. J., Collinsworth, L. L., & Perry, L. A. (2008). Critical climate: Relations among sexual harassment, climate, and outcomes for high school girls and boys. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oswald, D. L. (2008). Gender stereotypes and women’s reports of liking and ability in traditionally masculine and feminine occupations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 196–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purcell, P., & Stewart, L. (1990). Dick and Jane in 1989. Sex Roles, 22, 177–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, P. T., & Roberts, S. K. (2006). Gaining options: A mathematics program for potentially talented at-risk adolescent girls. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52, 288–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riordan, C. (1990). Girls and boys in school: Together or separate? New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivers, I., & Noret, N. (2008). Well-being among same-sex- and opposite-sex-attracted youth at school. School Psychology Review, 37, 174–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. I., & Jackson, J. M. (1991). Teachers’ expectations for Black males’ and Black females’ academic achievement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 78–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosser, S. V. (1997). Re-engineering female friendly science. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1994). Failing at fairness: How our schools cheat girls. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomone, R. C. (2006). Single-sex programs: Resolving the research conundrum. Teachers College Record, 108, 778–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sax, L. (2005). Why gender matters: What parents and teachers need to know about the emerging science of sex differences. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sax, L. J. (2007, September 28). College women still face many obstacles in reaching their full potential. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. B46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shih, M., Pittinsky, T. L., & Ambady, N. (1999). Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 10, 80–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommers, C. H. (2000). The war against boys: How misguided feminism is harming our young men. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statham, A., Richardson, L., & Cook, J. (1991). Gender and university teaching: A negotiated difference. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, J. R., & Ambady, N. (2006). “Math is hard!” The effect of gender priming on women’s attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 428–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Population Fund [UNFPA]. (2005). State of world population 2005: Gender equality and education. Retrieved July 16, 2008 from http://www.unfpa.org/swp/2005/presskit/factsheets/facts_gender.htm

  • United Nations Division for the Advancement of Women [UNDAW]. (2007). United Nations Fourth World Conference on Women. Retrieved July 18, 2008 from http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/index.html

  • U.S. Department of Education [USDOE]. (2005). Single-sex versus coeducational schooling: A systematic review (Document No. 2005-01). Washington, DC: Author, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development. Retrieved May 19, 2008 from http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/other/single-sex/index.html

  • Van Houtte, M. (2004). Why boys achieve less at school than girls: The difference between boys’ and girls’ academic culture. Educational Studies, 30, 159–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weil, E. (2008, March 2). Teaching boys and girls separately. New York Times Magazine. Retrieved April 16, 2008 from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/02/magazine/02sex3-t.html?ex=1205125200&en=4afe4ef0d6c63854&ei=5070&emc=eta1

  • Whitt, E. J., Edison, M. I., Pascarella, E. T., Nora, A., & Terenzini, P. T. (1999). Women’s perceptions of a “chilly climate” and cognitive outcomes in college: Additional evidence. Journal of College Student Development, 40, 163–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, L. C., & Marrett, C. B. (Eds.) (1985). Gender influences in classroom interaction. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolke, D., Woods, S., Stanford, K., & Schulz, H. (2001). Bullying and victimization of primary school children in England and Germany: Prevalence and school factors. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 673–696.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Younger, M. R., & Warrington, M. (2006). Would Harry and Hermione have done better in single-sex classes? A review of single-sex teaching in coeducational secondary schools in the United Kingdom. American Educational Research Journal, 43, 579–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Basow, S.A. (2010). Gender in the Classroom. In: Chrisler, J., McCreary, D. (eds) Handbook of Gender Research in Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1465-1_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics