Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Handbook of Gender Research in Psychology pp 259–274Cite as

On Tending to Our Scientific Knitting: Thinking About Gender in the Context of Evolution

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Because EP claims that differences between men and women have biological origins, sex rather than gender will be used to refer to the postulated differences henceforward.

References

  • Bjorklund, D. F., & Pellegrini, A. D. (2002). The origins of human nature. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buller, D. J. (2005a). Adapting minds: Evolutionary psychology and the persistent quest for human nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buller, D. J. (2005b). Evolutionary psychology: The emperor’s new paradigm. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 277–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (Ed.) (2005). The handbook of evolutionary psychology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chagnon, N. (1988). Life histories, blood revenge, and warfare in a tribal population. Science, 239, 985–992.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cherney, I., & Ryalls, B. (1999). Gender-linked differences in the incidental memory of children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 305–328.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colapinto, J. (2006). As nature made him: The boy who was raised as a girl. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coluccia, E., & Louse, G. (2004). Gender differences in spatial orientation: A review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 329–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D., & Waters, H. S. (1986). Sex differences in the use of organization strategies: A developmental analysis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41, 18–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, I., Hamilton, D. A., Yeo, R. A., Brooks, W. M., & Sutherland, R. J. (2005). Virtual navigation in humans: The impact of age, sex, and hormones on place learning. Hormones and Behavior, 47, 326–335.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. I. M., & Barrett, L. (Eds.) (2007). Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ecuyer-Dab, I., & Robert, M. (2004). Spatial ability and home-range size: Examining the relationship in Western men and women (homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 118, 217–231.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ecuyer-Dab, I., & Robert, M. (2007). The female advantage in object location memory according to the foraging hypothesis: A critical analysis. Human Nature, 18, 365–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P. C. (2007). A 14,000 year-old hunter-gatherer’s toolkit. Antiquity, 81, 865–876.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ember, M., & Ember, C. R. (1971). The conditions favoring matrilocal versus patrilocal residence. American Anthropologist, 73, 571–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fajen, B. R., & Warren, W. H. (2004). Visual guidance of intercepting a moving target on foot. Perception, 33, 689–715.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, D. (1983). Margaret Mead and Samoa: The making and unmaking of an anthropological myth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaulin, S. J. C., & Fitzgerald, R. W. (1986). Sex differences in spatial ability: An evolutionary hypothesis and test. American Naturalist, 127, 74–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaulin, S. J. C., & Fitzgerald, R. W. (1989). Sexual selection for spatial learning ability. Animal Behavior, 37, 322–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. C. (1998). Male, female. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guiso, L., Monte, F., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2008). Culture, gender, and math. Science, 320, 1164–1165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hampson, E. (2008). Endocrine contributions to sex differences in visuospatial perception and cognition. In J. B. Becker, K. J. Berkley, N. Geary, E. Hampson, J. P. Herman, & E. A. Young (Eds.), Sex differences in the brain: From genes to behavior (pp. 311–325). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hand, L. L., Uttal, D. H., Marulis, L., Newcombe, N. S., Waren, C., & Lewis, A. (under review). A meta-analysis of training effects on spatial skills: What works, for whom, and why?

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann, M., Slabbekoorn, D., Van Goozen, S. H. M., Cohen-Kettenis, P. T., & Güntürkün, O. (2000). Sex hormones affect spatial abilities during the menstrual cycle. Behavioral Neuroscience, 114, 1245–1250.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. M. (2000). The place of attachment in human mating. Review of General Psychology, 4, 186–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, J. F., Kail, R. V., & Siegel, A. W. (1979). Cognitive maps of a college campus: A new look at freshman orientation. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 13, 183–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines, M. (2007). Do sex differences in cognition cause the shortage of women in science? In S. J. Ceci & W. M. Williams (Eds.), Why aren’t more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 101–112). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, L. D. (1983). Margaret Mead’s Samoa: Views and reviews. Quarterly Review of Biology, 58, 539–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S., Lindberg, S. M., Linn, M. C., Ellis, A. B. & Williams, C. C. (2008). Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science, 321, 494–495.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, L. F., Gaulin, S. J. C., Sherry, D. F., & Hoffman, G. E. (1990). Evolution of spatial cognition: Sex-specific patterns of spatial behavior predict hippocampal size. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 87, 6349–6352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jager, R. (1990). Eight acres: Elegy for a family farm. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonasson, Z. (2005). Meta-analysis of sex differences in rodent models of learning and memory: A review of behavioral and biological data. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 28, 811–825.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. M., Braithwaite, V. A., & Healy, S. D. (2003). The evolution of sex differences in spatial ability. Behavioral Neuroscience, 117, 403–411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, S. J., & McKenna W. (1978). Gender: An ethnomethodological approach. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, D. (1999). Sex and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, S. L., & Stiner, M. C. (2006). What’s a mother to do? The division of labor among Neanderthals and modern humans in Eurasia. Current Anthropology, 47, 953–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479–1498.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E. (1998). The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Money, J., & Ehrhardt, A. A. (1972). Man and woman, boy and girl. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcombe, N., Bandura, M. M., & Taylor, D. G. (1983). Sex differences in spatial ability and spatial activities. Sex Roles, 9, 377–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Laughlin, E. M., & Brubaker, B. S. (1998). Use of landmarks in cognitive mapping: Gender differences in self report versus performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 595–601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (2002). The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puts, D. A., McDaniel, M. A., Jordan, C. L., & Breedlove, S. M. (2008). Spatial ability and prenatal androgens: Meta-analyses of congenital adrenal hyperplasia and digit ratio (2D:4D) studies. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 100–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saucier, D. M., Green, S. M., Leason, J., MacFadden, A., Bell, S., & Elias, L. J. (2002). Are sex differences in navigation caused by sexually dimorphic strategies or by differences in the ability to use the strategies? Behavioral Neuroscience, 116, 403–410.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saucier, D., Lisoway, A., Green, S., & Elias, L. (2007). Female advantage for object location memory in peripersonal but not extrapersonal space. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 13, 683–686.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sawrey, D. K., Keith, J. R., & Backes, R. C. (1994). Place learning by three vole species (Microtus ochrogaster, M. montanus, and M. pennsylvanicus) in the Morris swim task. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108, 179–188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Fundamentals of human mating strategies. In D.M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 258–291). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitzer-Torbert, N. (2007). Place and response learning in human virtual navigation: Behavioral measures and gender differences. Behavioral Neuroscience, 121, 277–290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, I., & Choi, J. (2005). Locating places. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 177–199). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, I., Choi, J., Mackewn, A., Fisher, M., Moro, J. & Olshansky, E. (2000). Evolved mechanisms underlying wayfinding: Further studies on the hunter-gatherer theory of spatial sex differences. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 201–213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, I., & Eals, M. (1992). Sex differences in spatial abilities: Evolutionary theory and data. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind (pp. 533–549). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spritzer, M. D., Meikle, D. B., & Solomon, N. G. (2004). The relationship between dominance rank and spatial ability among male meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 118, 332–339.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spritzer, M. D., Solomon, N. G., & Meikle, D. B. (2005). Influence of scramble competition for mates upon the spatial ability of male meadow voles. Animal Behaviour, 69, 375–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terlecki, M. S., Newcombe, N. S., & Little, M. (2008). Durable and generalized effects of spatial experience on mental rotation: Gender differences in growth patterns. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 996–1013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R. (2007). The evolution of women’s estrus, extended sexuality, and concealed ovulation, and their implications for human sexuality research. In S. W. Gangestad & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), The evolution of mind: Fundamental questions and controversies (pp. 391–396). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooby, J., & DeVore, I. (1987). The reconstruction of hominid behavioral evolution through strategic modeling. In W. G. Kinzey (Ed.), The evolution of human behavior: Primate models (pp. 183–237). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voyer, D., Postma, A., Brake, B., & Imperato-McGinley, J. (2007). Gender differences in object location memory: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 23–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250–270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, N. V., & Kimura, D. (1991). Nontrivial sex differences in throwing and intercepting: Relation to psychometrically-defined spatial functions. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 375–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westen, D. (1998). The scientific legacy of Sigmund Freud: Toward a psychodynamically informed psychological science. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 333–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Nora S. Newcombe

Authors
  1. Nora S. Newcombe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Connecticut College, Mohegan Avenue 270, New London, 06320, U.S.A.

    Joan C. Chrisler

  2. Elm Street 38, Toronto, M5G 2K5, Canada

    Donald R. McCreary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Newcombe, N.S. (2010). On Tending to Our Scientific Knitting: Thinking About Gender in the Context of Evolution. In: Chrisler, J., McCreary, D. (eds) Handbook of Gender Research in Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1465-1_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation