Abstract
The first reaction of many reviewers to a research proposal or a journal article is either excitement or boredom. If the proposal is boring, they are unlikely to vote a high rating. In almost any science, a necessary but not sufficient condition for something to be important – which in this context means being fundable, being reportable in good scientific journals, and perhaps having an impact on the field – is that it is exciting. When you talk to your friends about your research idea, your proposal should elicit excitement; if it does not, you should think more about your ideas. This chapter suggests that when someone expounds a belief or a theory, excitement is created by the credible possibility that it is not true. The greatest compliment to the person proposing the idea is to say, “I do not believe it!” This chapter shows that a way to generate excitement is to compare two or more reasonable hypotheses and propose research to show that one of them predicts data better than the other(s). It will help you to craft a proposal that says, “I believe that these relationships hold and I am going to test them in such a way that I predict something that others do not predict.”
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Carroll, J., Wiener, R.I., Coates, D., Galegher, J., & Alibrio, I.S. (1982). Evaluation, diagnosis and prediction in parole decision making. Law and Society Review, 35, 199–228.
Dawes, R.M. (1971). A case study of graduate admission: Applications of three principles of human decision making. American Psychologist, 26, 180–188.
Dawes, R.M., & Corrigan, B. (1974). Linear models in decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 95–106.
Dawes, R.M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P.E. (1989). Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science, 243, 1668–1674.
Lichtenstein, S., & Feeney, G.J. (1968). The importance of the data generating model in probability estimation. Journal of Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 42, 62–67.
Meier, P. (1972). The biggest public health experiment ever: 1954 field trial of the Sulk poliomyelitis vaccine (pp. 2–13). In Tanu, J.M., Mosteller, F., Kruskal, W.A., Link, R.F., Pieters, R.S., & Rising, G.R. (eds.). Statistics: A Guide to the Unknown. San Francisco: Holden-Day.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dawes, R. (2010). How Do You Formulate a Testable Exciting Hypothesis?. In: Pequegnat, W., Stover, E., Boyce, C. (eds) How to Write a Successful Research Grant Application. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1454-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1454-5_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-1453-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-1454-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)