Establishing the IVF Laboratory: A Systems View

  • Antonia V. Gilligan
Chapter

Abstract

The modern IVF laboratory is an integral part of the system used to support human embryo growth. The laboratory must be designed to provide the essential maternal supports for fertilization and development to the blastocyst stage. The laboratory must provide a physical barrier to microbial contamination and chemical degradation. This is done by using a high level of pressurization and isolation. Air supplied to the IVF laboratory is both filtered for particulates and chemical contaminates. Selecting “clean” materials for construction complements our efforts to remove embryotoxic materials from the IVF laboratory. If successfully done, the isolation, pressurization, plus particulate and chemical filtration will result in higher pregnancy and implantation rates.

Keywords

Laboratory construction Air quality Construction materials Volatile organic compounds Laboratory equipment 

References

  1. 1.
    Schiewe M, Schmidt P, Bush M, Wildt D (1985) Toxicity potential of absorbed-retained ethylene oxide residues in cluture dishes on embryo development in vitro. J Anim Sci 60(6):1610-1618PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schiewe M, Schmidt P, Pontbriand D, Wildt D (1988) Toxicity potential of residual ethylene oxide on fresh or frozen embryos maintained in plastic straws. Gamete Res 19:31-39CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Miller K, Fry K (2000) Failure of The American Association of Bioanalysis Culture Proficiency test to perform under certain culture conditions. Fertil Steril 74(Supp #3):S105-S106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Miller KF, Pursel VG (1987) Absorption of compounds in medium by the oil covering microdrop cultures. Gamete Res 17(1):57-61CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    AIA issues new guidelines for the design and construction of healthcare facilities. Healthc Hazard Manage Monit 2006;20(3):1-6Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wallace L (ed) (1985) Organic chemicals in indoor air: a review of human exposure studies and indoor air quality studies, Lewis Publishers, USAGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sterling D (ed) (1985) Volatile organic compounds in indoor air: an overview of sources, concentrations, and health effects, Lewis Publishers, USAGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Harrison P (2007) Health impacts of indoor air pollution. Chem Ind 17:677-681Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wolfoff P, Nielsen G (2001) Organic compounds in indoor air and their relevance for perceived indoor air quality. Atmos Environ 35:4407-4417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hall J, Gilligan A, Schimmel T, Cecchi M, Cohen J (1998) The origin, effects and control of air pollution in laboratories used for human embryo culture. Hum Reprod 13(S4):146-155PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cohen J, Gilligan A, Wiladsen S (1998) Culture and quality control embryos. Hum Reprod 13(S3):137-144PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cohen J, Gilligan A, Esposito W, Schimmel T, Dale B (1997) Ambient air and its potential effects on conception in vitro. Human reproduction, Oxford, England, 12(8):1742-1749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Compendium of methods for the determination of toxic organic compounds in ambient air, EPA; 1984/1988 AprilGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hirao Y, Yanagimachi R (1978) Detrimental effect of visible light on meiosis of mammalian eggs in vitro. J Exp Zool 206(3):365-369CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mayer J, Nehchinri F, Weedon V et al (1999) Prospective randomized crossover analysis of the impact on an incubator air filtration system (Coda, genX, Internation, Inc.) on IVF outcomes. Fertil Steril 72(Sup. 1):S42Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Boone WR, Johnson JE, Locke AJ, Crane MMT, Price TM (1999) Control of air quality in an assisted reproductive technology laboratory. Fertil Steril 71(1):150-154CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Worrilow K, Huynh H, Gwozdziewicz J, Schillings W, Peters A (2001) A retrospective analysis: The examination of a potential relationship between particulates and volatile organic compound levels in a clas 100 laboratory cleanroom and specific parapmeters of embryogenesis and rates of implantation. Fertil Steril 76(Supp 3):S15-S16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Worrilow K, Huynh H, Gwozdziewicz J, Schillings W, Peters A (2002) A retrospective analysis: Seasonal decline in implantation rates and its correlation with increased levels of volatile organic compounds (VOC). Fertil Steril 78(Supp 3):3SGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonia V. Gilligan
    • 1
  1. 1.Alpha Environmental, IncEmersonUSA

Personalised recommendations