Skip to main content

Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Peripheral Endovascular Interventions

Abstract

The application of ultrasound in medical diagnosis has increased considerably due to the miniaturization of ultrasonic transducers and overall compatibility and ease of use. Current intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) catheters provide real-time, high-resolution, cross-sectional, sectional imaging in vessels with dimensional accuracy. IVUS can delineate wall morphology, lesion consistency and length, as well as the exact location of visceral or aortic branch orifices. Concomitant rapid expansion of minimally invasive endovascular therapies continues to add new roles for IVUS. In addition to diagnostic information, IVUS can assist clinicians in choosing appropriate endovascular devices and appropriate deployment sites and guidance. IVUS also allows real-time post-procedural assessment of efficacy on intervention. Further acceptance and implementation relies on effectiveness of IVUS in improving outcomes and minimizing peri- and post-procedural complications, as compared to alternative imaging modalities. This chapter reviews the design and function of available IVUS catheters, imaging techniques, and therapeutic utility in peripheral endovascular interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Born N, ten Hoff H, Lancee CT et al.: Early and recent intraluminal ultrasound devices, Int J Card Imag 4:79–88, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cieszynski T: Intracardiac method for the investigation of structure of the heart with the aid of ultrasonics, Arch Immunol Ter Dow 8:551–557, 1960.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kossof G: Diagnostic applications of ultrasound in cardiology, Australas Radiol X:101–106, 1966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carleton RA, Sessions RW, Graettinger JS: Diameter of heart measured by intracavitary ultrasound, Med Res Eng 28–32, May 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Frazin L, Talano JV, Stephanides L et al.: Esophageal echocardiography, Circulation 54:168–171, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Born N, Lancee CT, Van Egmond FC: An ultrasonic intracardiac scanner, Ultrasonics 10:72–76, 1972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Irshad K, Reid DB, Miller PH, Velu R, Kopchok GE, White RA: Early clinical experience with color three-dimensional ultrasound in peripheral interventions, J Endovasc Ther 8:329–339, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yock PG, Linker DT, Angelsen BAJ: Two-dimensional intravascular ultrasound: technical development and initial clinical experience, J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2(4):296–304, 1989.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gussenhoven WJ, Essed CE, Lancee CT: Arterial wall characteristics determined by intravascular ultrasound imaging: an in-vitro study, J Am Coll Cardiol 14:947–952, 1989.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gussenhoven WJ, Essed CE, Frietman P et al.: Intravascular echographic assessment of vessel wall characteristics: a correlation with histology, Int J Cardiac Imag 4:105–116, 1989.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tobis JM, Mahon D, Lehmann K et al.: The sensitivity of ultrasound imaging compared to angiography for diagnosing coronary atherosclerosis, Circulation 82(suppl III):439, 1990, abstract.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cavaye DM, French WJ, White RA et al.: Intravascular ultrasound imaging of an acute dissecting aortic aneurysm: a case report, J Vasc Surg 13:510–512, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  13. St Goar FG, Pinto FJ, Aldermann EL et al.: Intracoronary ultrasound in cardiac transplant recipients: in-vivo evaluation of angiographically silent intimal thickening, J Am Coll Cardiol 17:103A, 1994, abstract.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pinto FJ, St. Goar FG, Chaign M et al.: Intracoronary ultrasound evaluation of intimal thickening in cardiac transplant recipients: correlation with clinical characteristics, J Am Coll Cardiol 17:103A, 1994, abstract.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ricou FJ, Nicod PH, Moser KM: Intravascular ultrasound imaging of chronic pulmonary thromboembolic disease: correlation with surgical results, Circulation 82(suppl 3):441, 1990, abstract.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Barone GW, Kahn MB, Cook JM et al.: Recurrent intracaval renal cell carcinoma: the role of intravascular ultrasonography, J Vasc Surg 13:506–509, 1991.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kopchok GE, White RA, Guthrie C et al.: Intraluminal vascular ultrasound: preliminary report of dimensional and morphologic accuracy, Ann Vasc Surg 4:291–296, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kopchok GE, White RA, White G: Intravascular ultrasound: a new potential modality for angioplasty guidance, Angiology 41:785–792, 1990.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mallery JA, Tobis JM, Griffith J et al.: Assessment of normal and atherosclerotic arterial wall thickness with an intravascular ultrasound imaging catheter, Am Heart J 119:1392–1400, 1990.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nissen SE, Grines CL, Gurley JC et al.: Application of new phased-array ultrasound imaging catheter in the assessment of vascular dimensions, Circulation 81:660–666, 1990.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Nissen SE, Gurley JC, Grines CL et al.: Intravascular ultrasound assessing of lumen size and wall morphology in normal subjects and patients with coronary artery disease, Circulation 88:1087–1099, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tabbara MR, White RA, Cavaye DM et al.: In-vivo human comparison of intravascular ultrasound and angiography, J Vasc Surg 14:496–504, 1991.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Geselschap JH, Heilbron MJ, Hussain FM, Daskalakis TM, Wilson EP, Kopchok GE, White RA: The effect of angulation on intravascular ultrasound imaging observed in vascular phantoms, J Endovasc Surg 5:126–133, 1998.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fernandez JD, Donovan S, Garrett E Jr, Burgar S: Endovascular thoracic aorta aneurysm repair: evaluating the utility of intravascular ultrasound measurements, J Endovasc Ther 15(1):68–72, 2008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dillavou ED, Buck DG, Muluk SC, Makaroun MS: Two-dimensional verse three-dimensional CT scan for Aortic Measurement, J Endovasc Ther 10:531–538, 2003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. The SHK, Gussenhoven WJ, Zhong Y et al.: Effect of balloon angioplasty on femoral artery evaluated with intravascular ultrasound imaging, Circulation 86:483–493, 1992.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gaster AL, Skjoldberg US, Larsen J: Continued improvement of clinical outcome and cost effectiveness following IVUS guided PCI, Heart 89(9):1043–1049, September 2003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Busquet J: The current role of vascular stents, Int Angiol 12(3):206–213, 1993.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tobis JM, Mahon DJ, Goldberg SL et al.: Lessons from intravascular ultrasonography: observations during interventional angioplasty procedures, J Clin Ultrasound 21:589–607, 1993.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee SD, Arko FR, Buckley CJ: Impact of intravascular ultrasonography in the endovascular management of aortoiliac occlusive disease, J Vasc Nurs 16(3):57–61, September 1998.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Diethrich EB: Endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic occlusive disease: the impact of stents and intravascular ultrasound imaging, Eur J Vasc Surg 7:228–236, 1993.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Cavaye DM, Diethrich EB, Santiago OJ et al.: Intravascular ultrasound imaging: an essential component of angioplasty assessment and vascular stent deployment, Int Angiol 12:212–220, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Arko F, Mettauer M, McCollough R, Patterson D, Manning L, Buckley CJ: Use of intravascular ultrasound improves long-term clinical outcome in the management of atherosclerotic aortoiliac occlusive disease, J Vasc Surg 27(4):614–623, 1998.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. van Essen JA, van der Lugt A, Gussenhoven EJ, Leertouwer TC, Zondervan P, Sambeek MR: Intravascular ultrasonography allows accurate assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm: an in vitro validation study, J Vasc Surg 27(2):347–353, 1998.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. van Essen JA, Gussenhoven EJ, Blankensteijn JD, Honkoop J, van Dijk LC, van Sambeek MR, van der Lugt A: Three dimensional intravascular ultrasound assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm necks, J Endovasc Ther 7(5):380–388, 2000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. White RA, Donayre C, Kopchok GE: Utility of intravascular ultrasound in peripheral interventions, Tex Heart Inst J 24:28–34, 1997.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Nishanian G, Kopchok GE, Donayre CE, White RA: The impact of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) on endovascular interventions, Seminars Vasc Surg 12(4):285–299, 1999.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Slovut DP, Ofstein LC, Bacharach JM: Endoluminal AAA repair using intravascular ultrasound for graft planning and deployment, J Endovasc Ther 10:463–475, 2003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Thompson MM, Smith J, Naylor AR et al.: Microembolization during endovascular and conventional aneurysm repair, J Vasc Surg 25:179–186, 1997.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Dake MD, Kato N, Mitchell RS et al.: Endovascular stent-graft placement for treatment of acute aortic dissection, N Engl J Med 340:1546–1554, 1999.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Nienaber CA, Fattori R, Lund G et al.: Nonsurgical reconstruction of thoracic aortic dissection by stent graft placement, N Engl J Med 340:1539–1545, 1999.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Greenberg RK, Haulon S, Khwaja J, Fulton G, Ouriel K: Contemporary Management of acute aortic dissection, J Endovasc Ther 10:476–485, 2003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Quint LE, Platt JF, Sonnad SS, Deep GM, Williams DM: Aortic intimal tears: detection with spiral Computer Tomography, J Endovasc Ther 10:505–510, 2003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Waller BF: The eccentric coronary atherosclerotic plaque: morphologic observations and clinical relevance, Clin Cardiol 12:14–20, 1989.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. White RA, Donayre C, Walot I, Lee J, Kopchok GE: Regression of a descending thoracoabdominal aortic dissection following staged deployment of thoracic and abdominal aortic endografts, J Endovasc Ther 9(suppl II):84–92, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Chabbert V, Otal P, Bouchard L, Soula P, Van TT, Kos X, Meites G, Claude C, Joffre F, Rousseau H: Midterm outcomes of thoracic aortic stent-grafts: complications and imaging techniques, J Endovasc Ther 10:494–504, 2003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Woody JD, Walot I, Donayre CE, Eugene J, Carey JS, White RA: Endovascular exclusion of leaking thoracic aortic aneurysms, J Endovasc Ther 9:II-79–II-83, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Oppat WF, Chiou AC, Matsumura J: Intravascular Ultrasound-guided vena cava filter placement, J Endovasc Surg 6:285–287, 1999.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Matsuura JH, White RA, Kopchok GE, Nishinian G, Woody JD, Rosenthal D, Clark MD: Vena cava filter placement by intravascular ultrasound, Cardiovascular Surg 9(6):571–574, 2001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Diethrich EB, Irshad K, Reid DB: Virtual histology and color flow intravascular ultrasound in peripheral interventions, Semin Vasc Surg 19:155–162, 2006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Rodriguez-Granillo GA, Mc Fadden E, Ligthart JM, Aoki J, Regar E, de Feyter PJ, Serruys PW: Geometrical validation of intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis (Virtual Histology) acquired with a 30 M Hz Boston Scientific corporation imaging catheter, Catheter Cardiovasc Inter 66(4):514–518, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Diethrich EB, Pauliina Margolis M, Reid DB, Burke A, Ramaiah V, Rodriguez-Lopez JA, Wheatley G, Olsen D, Vermani R: Virtual histology intravascular ultrasound assessment of carotid artery disease: the Carotid Artery Virtual Histology Evaluation (CAPITAL) study, J Endovasc Ther 14(5):687–688, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Schiro BJ, Wholey MH: The expanding indications for virtual histology intravascular ultrasound for plaque analysis prior to carotid stenting, J. Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 49(6):729–736, 2008.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kopchok, G.E., White, R.A. (2010). Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging. In: Fogarty, T., White, R. (eds) Peripheral Endovascular Interventions. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1387-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1387-6_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-1386-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-1387-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics