Advertisement

Personality Disorders

  • Brian P. O’ConnorEmail author
  • Edouard S. St. Pierre
Chapter

Abstract

Personality disorders (PDs) are characteristic, maladaptive patterns of thoughts, feelings, perceptions, and behaviors that begin early and last long. They are displayed in a wide range of situations. They affect many spheres of the individual’s life. They also involve departures from the standards of behavior in the individual’s social-cultural environment. They are often described as extreme and inflexible manifestations of personality characteristics that can be found in normal populations.

The ten heterogeneous PDs in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR; American Psychiatric Association, 2000) exist in the region between psychological health and illness. Social and occupational functioning may be impaired, but without major distress or loss of contact with reality. People do not suddenly become “ill” with a PD and seek help. Instead, people with PDs feel normal and at home with their conditions. Their disordered personalities and self-concepts are all they know and remember, and they may value the traits in themselves that are problematic for those around them. PDs are “ego-syntonic,” whereas most other DSM-IV-TR disorders are ego-dystonic conditions that feel unfamiliar and undesirable. PDs are more closely tied to cultural expectations than other DSM-IV-TR disorders. Diagnosing PDs requires that judgments of personality deviance be made about persons who often value their maladaptive beliefs and habits. Although persons with PDs may not be distressed by their adjustment difficulties, they are often unhappy and distress can be found in their lives. PDs are often intertwined with academic problems, work problems, family and relationship problems, substance abuse, violence and criminality, suicide, mortality, accidents, emergency room visits, child custody battles, and therapy failures, dropouts, and referrals. PDs may affect the course of Axis I disorders and responses to psychological and pharmacological treatments. Individuals with PDs are often reluctant to accept professional help and they tend to blame others for their difficulties (O’Connor & Dyce, 2001).

Keywords

Personality Disorder Semistructured Interview Informant Report Multimodal Assessment Interpretive Report 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alarcón, R. D. (2005). Cross-cultural issues. In J. M. Oldham, A. E. Skodol & D. S. Bender (Eds.), Textbook of personality disorders (pp. 561–578). Washington: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  3. Blashfield, R. K., & Herkov, M. J. (1996). Investigating clinician adherence to diagnosis by criteria: A replication of Morey and Ochoa (1989). Journal of Personality Disorders, 10, 219–228.Google Scholar
  4. Calliess, I. T., Sieberer, M., Machleidt, W., & Ziegenbein, M. (2008). Personality disorders in a cross-cultural perspective: Impact of culture and migration on diagnosis and etiological aspects. Current Psychiatry Reviews, 4(1), 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clark, L. A. (2007). Assessment and diagnosis of PD: Perennial issues and an emerging reconceptualization. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 227–257.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark, L. A., & Harrison, J. A. (2001). Assessment instruments. In W. J. Livesley (Ed.), Handbook of personality disorders: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 277–306). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  7. Clifton, A., Turkheimer, E., & Oltmanns, T. F. (2005). Self- and peer perspectives on pathological personality traits and interpersonal problems. Psychological Assessment, 117, 123–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  9. First, M., Gibbon, M., Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., & Benjamin, L. S. (1997). User’s guide for the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV Axis II PDs. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
  10. Ganellen, R. J. (2007). Assessing normal and abnormal personality functioning: Strengths and weaknesses of self-report, observer, and performance-based methods. Journal of Personality Assessment, 89, 30–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Garb, H. N. (1997). Race bias, social class bias, and gender bias in clinical judgment. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 4, 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hyler, S. E. (1994). Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4 (PDQ-4). New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute.Google Scholar
  13. Kay, J., & Tasman, A. (2006). Essentials of psychiatry. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kaye, A. L., & Shea, T. M. (2000). Personality disorders, personality traits, and defense mechanisms. In A. J. Rush Jr., H. A. Pincus & M. B. First (Eds.), Handbook of psychiatric measures (pp. 713–749). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  15. Klein, D. N. (2003). Patients’ versus informants’ reports of personality disorders in predicting 7½-year outcome in outpatients with depressive disorder. Psychological Assessment, 15, 216–222.Google Scholar
  16. Klonsky, E. D., Oltmanns, T. F., & Turkheimer, E. (2002). Informant-reports of PD: Relation to self-reports and future research directions. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 300–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Livesley, W. J. (2001). Handbook of personality disorders. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  18. Loranger, A. W. (1999). International personality disorder examination (IPDE). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  19. Lowe, J. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2008). Personality disorders. In J. E. Maddux & B. A. Winstead (Eds.), Psychopathology: Foundations for a contemporary understanding (pp. 223–249). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  20. Maj, M., Akiskal, H. S., Mezzich, J. E., & Okasha, A. (Eds). (2005). Personality disorders. West Sussex, England: Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. Meyer, G. J., Finn, S. E., Eyde, L. D., Kay, G. G., Moreland, K. L., Dies, R. R., et al. (2001). Psychological testing and psychological assessment: A review of evidence and issues. American Psychologist, 56, 128–165.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Millon, T., Davis, R., & Millon, C. (1997). Manual for the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III (MCMI-III). Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.Google Scholar
  23. Morey, L. C. (1991). Personality Assessment Inventory. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  24. Morey, L. C. (1996). An interpretive guide to the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  25. Morey, L. C., Alexander, G. M., & Boggs, C. (2005). Gender. In J. M. Oldham, A. E. Skodol & D. S. Bender (Eds.), Textbook of personality disorders (pp. 541–560). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
  26. O’Connor, B. P., & Dyce, J. A. (2001). Personality disorders. In M. Hersen & V. B. Van Hasselt (Eds.), Advanced abnormal psychology (pp. 399–417). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.Google Scholar
  27. Paris, J. (1996). Social factors in the personality disorders: A biopsychosocial approach to aetiology and treatment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Perry, J. C. (1992). Problems and considerations in the valid assessment of PDs. American Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 1645–1653.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Pfohl, B., Blum, N., & Zimmerman, M. (1997). Structured interview for DSM-IV personality. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
  30. Ready, R. E., Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (2002). Correspondence of psychiatric patient and informant ratings of personality traits, temperament, and interpersonal problems. Psychological Assessment, 14, 39–49.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Segal, D. L., Coolidge, F. L., & Rosowsky, E. (2006). Personality disorders and older adults: Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  32. Sperry, L. (2003). Handbook of diagnosis and treatment of the DSM-IV personality disorders. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  33. Trull, T. J., & Widiger, T. A. (1997). Structured interview for the five-factor model of personality. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  34. Tyrer, P., Coombs, N., Ibrahimi, F., Mathilakath, A., Bajaj, P., Ranger, M., et al. (2007). Critical developments in the assessment of PD [Special Issue: Assessment, risk and outcome in severe PD]. British Journal of Psychiatry, 190(Suppl. 49), 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Widiger, T. A. (1998). Sex biases in the diagnosis of personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 12, 95–118.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Widiger, T. A., & Coker, L. A. (2002). Assessing personality disorders. In J. N. Butcher (Ed.), Clinical personality assessment: Practical approaches (2nd ed., pp. 407–434). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Widiger, T. A., Mangine, S., Corbitt, E. M., Ellis, C. G., & Thomas, G. V. (1995). Personality Disorder Interview-IV: A semistructured interview for the assessment of personality disorders. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  38. Widiger, T. A., & Sanderson, C. J. (1997). Personality disorders. In A. Tasman, J. Kay & J. A. Lieberman (Eds.), Psychiatry (Vol. 2, pp. 1291–1317). Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.Google Scholar
  39. Widiger, T. A., & Simonsen, E. (2005). Alternative dimensional models of personality disorder: Finding a common ground. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19(2), 110–130.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Widiger, T. A., Simonsen, E., Sirovatka, P. J., & Regier, D. A. (2006). Dimensional models of personality disorders: Refining the research agenda for DSM-V. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  41. Yudofsky, S. C. (2005). Fatal flaws: Navigating destructive relationships with people with disorders of personality and character. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
  42. Zanarini, M. C., Frankenburg, F. R., Chauncey, D. L., & Gunderson, J. G. (1987). The Diagnostic Interview for Personality Disorders: Interrater and test-retest reliability. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 28, 467–480.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Zimmerman, M., Pfohl, B., Stangl, D., & Corenthal, C. (1986). Assessment of DSM-III PDs: The importance of interviewing an informant. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 47, 261–263.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Barber School of Arts and SciencesUniversity of British Columbia – OkanaganKelownaCanada
  2. 2.St. Joseph’s Care GroupLakehead Psychiatric HospitalThunder BayCanada

Personalised recommendations