Skip to main content

First-Order Logic

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover A Concise Introduction to Mathematical Logic

Part of the book series: Universitext ((UTX))

  • 5920 Accesses

Abstract

Mathematics and some other disciplines such as computer science often consider domains of individuals in which certain relations and operations are singled out. When using the language of propositional logic, our ability to talk about the properties of such relations and operations is very limited. Thus, it is necessary to refine our linguistic means of expression, in order to procure new possibilities of description. To this end, one needs not only logical symbols but also variables for the individuals of the domain being considered, as well as a symbol for equality and symbols for the relations and operations in question. First-order logic, sometimes called also predicate logic, is the part of logic that subjects properties of such relations and operations to logical analysis.

Linguistic particles such as “for all” and “there exists” (called quantifiers) play a central role here, whose analysis should be based on a well prepared semantic background. Hence, we first consider mathematical structures and classes of structures. Some of these are relevant both to logic (in particular model theory) and to computer science. Neither the newcomer nor the advanced student needs to read all of 2.1, with its mathematical flavor, at once. The first five pages should suffice. The reader may continue with 2.2 and later return to what is needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Here r and f represent the general case and look different in a concrete situation. Relation symbols are also called predicate symbols, in particular in the unary case, and operation symbols are sometimes called function symbols. In special contexts, we also admit n = 0, regarding constants as 0-ary operations.

  2. 2.

    \((\exists \vec{b}\in {A}^{\langle n\rangle })(h\vec{a}=h\vec{b}\ \&\ {r}^{\langle \mathcal{A}\rangle }\vec{b}\,)\) abbreviates ‘there is some \(\vec{b} \in {A}^{\langle n\rangle }\) with \(h\vec{a} = h\vec{b}\) and \({r}^{\langle \mathcal{A}\rangle }\vec{b}\)’. If \(h\:\mathcal{A}\rightarrow \mathcal{B}\) is onto (and only this case will occur in our applications) then (S) is equivalent to the more suggestive condition \({r}^{\langle \mathcal{B}\rangle } =\{ h\vec{a}\mid {r}^{\langle \mathcal{A}\rangle }\vec{a}\}\).

  3. 3.

    Since rkφ < rk ∀xφ, we may assume according to the recursive construction of σ that \({\varphi }^{\langle \tau \rangle }\) is already defined for all global substitutions τ.

  4. 4.

    Since this equation is to mean \(\text{ {\it free}}\,\varphi \subseteq \{ x1,\ldots ,xn\}\), \(\vec{x}\) is not uniquely determined by φ. Hence, the phrase “Let \(\varphi = \varphi (\vec{x})\ldots \)” implicitly includes along with a given φ also a tuple \(\vec{x}\) given in advance. The notation \(\varphi = \varphi (\vec{x})\) does not even state that φ contains free variables at all.

  5. 5.

    A suggestive way of writing “X ⊨ α, β implies X ⊨ α ∧ β,” a notation that was introduced already in Exercise 3 in 1.3. A corresponding notation will also be used in stating the properties of ⊨ on the next page.

  6. 6.

    Consistent mostly refers to a logic calculus, e.g., the calculus in 3.1. However, it will be shown in 3.2 that consistency and satisfiability of a theory coincide, thus justifying the word’s ambiguous use.

References

  1. _________ , Introduction to Logic and to the Methodology of Deductive Sciences, Oxford 1941, 3⟨{ rd}⟩ ed. Oxford Univ. Press 1965 (first edition in Polish, 1936).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Tarski, Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den formalisierten Sprachen, Studia Philosophica 1 (1936), 261–405 (first edition in Polish, 1933), also in [Ta4, 152-278].

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Hilbert, P. Bernays, Grundlagen der Mathematik, I, II, Berlin 1934, 1939, 2⟨{ nd}⟩ ed. Springer, Vol. I 1968, Vol. II 1970.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolfgang Rautenberg .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rautenberg, W. (2010). First-Order Logic. In: A Concise Introduction to Mathematical Logic. Universitext. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1221-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics