Skip to main content

Propositional Logic

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover A Concise Introduction to Mathematical Logic

Part of the book series: Universitext ((UTX))

  • 6140 Accesses

Abstract

Propositional logic, by which we here mean two-valued propositional logic, arises from analyzing connections of given sentences A, B, such as

$$\mathit{A\ and\ B,\quad A\ or\ B,\quad not\ A,\quad if \ A\ then\ B}.$$

These connection operations can be approximately described by two-valued logic. There are other connections that have temporal or local features, for instance, first A then B or here A there B, as well as unary modal operators like it is necessarily true that, whose analysis goes beyond the scope of two-valued logic. These operators are the subject of temporal, modal, or other subdisciplines of many-valued or nonclassical logic. Furthermore, the connections that we began with may have a meaning in other versions of logic that two-valued logic only incompletely captures. This pertains in particular to their meaning in natural or everyday language, where meaning may strongly depend on context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Converse implication is used in the programming language PROLOG, see 4.6.

  2. 2.

    We often use ( ∗ ) or ( ⋆ ) as a temporary label for a condition (or property) that we refer back to in the text following the labeled condition.

  3. 3.

    This concept, stemming originally from geometry, is meaningfully defined in every algebraic structure and is one of the most important and most general mathematical concepts; see 2.1. The definition is equivalent to the condition

    $$\alpha \equiv \alpha '\; \Rightarrow \; \alpha \circ \beta \equiv \alpha ' \circ \beta ,\beta \circ \alpha \equiv \beta \circ \alpha ',\neg \alpha \equiv \neg \alpha ',for \; all\alpha ,\alpha ',\beta.$$
  4. 4.

    The disjuncts of αf can be arranged, for instance, according to the lexicographical order of the n-tuples (x1,…,xn) ∈{ 0, 1}n. If the disjunction is empty (that is, if f does not take the value 1) let αf be ⊥ (= p1 ∧¬p1). Thus, the empty disjunction is ⊥. Similarly, the empty conjunction equals ⊤ (= ¬⊥). These conventions correspond to those in arithmetic, where the empty sum is 0 and the empty product is 1.

  5. 5.

    Unexplained notions are defined in 2.1. Our first application is interesting because in set theory the compactness theorem is weaker than the axiom of choice (AC) which is equivalent to the statement that every set can be well-ordered. Thus, the ordering principle is weaker than AC since it follows from the compactness theorem.

  6. 6.

    Putting it crudely, this notation should express the fact that β is held to be proved from a formula set X when α and α → β are provable from X. Modus ponens is an example of a binary Hilbert-style rule; for a general definition of this type of rule see, for instance, [Ra1].

References

  1. G. Kreisel, J.-L. Krivine, Elements of Mathematical Logic, North-Holland 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. Rautenberg, Klassische und Nichtklassische Aussagenlogik, Vieweg 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Gentzen, The Collected Papers of Gerhard Gentzen (editor M. E. Szabo), North-Holland 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. Rasiowa, R. Sikorski, The Mathematics of Metamathematics, Warschau 1963, 3⟨{ rd}⟩ ed. Polish Scientific Publ. 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  5. B. Herrmann, W. Rautenberg, Finite replacement and finite Hilbert-style axiomatizability, Zeitsch. Math. Logik Grundlagen Math. 38 (1982), 327–344.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Kleene, Introduction to Metamathematics, Amsterdam 1952, 2⟨{ nd}⟩ ed. Wolters-Noordhoff 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  7. _________ , A note on completeness and maximality in propositional logic, Reports on Mathematical Logic 21 (1987), 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolfgang Rautenberg .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rautenberg, W. (2010). Propositional Logic. In: A Concise Introduction to Mathematical Logic. Universitext. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1221-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics