Skip to main content

An Assessment System on the Semantic Web

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Web 2.0 & Semantic Web

Part of the book series: Annals of Information Systems ((AOIS,volume 6))

Abstract

This paper presents a way to develop a modern assessment system on the Semantic Web. The system is based on the IMS QTI standard (question and test interoperability) and designed by applying the model driven architecture software engineering standards. It uses the XML meta-data interchange specification and ontologies. We propose the framework for assessment systems that is reusable, extensible, and that facilitates interoperability between its component systems. The central idea here is using description logic reasoning techniques for intelligent analysis of students’ solutions of the problems they are working on during assessment sessions with the system, in order to process open-ended questions. This innovative approach can be applied in the IMS QTI standard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.omg.org

  2. 2.

    http://www.gentleware.com

  3. 3.

    http://mdr.netbeans.org/uml2mof/

  4. 4.

    http://www.eclipse.org/gmt

  5. 5.

    http://www.imsglobal.org/question/qti_v2p1pd/examples/items/choice.xml

  6. 6.

    http://www.imsglobal.org/question/qti_v2p1pd/examples/items/text_entry.xml

  7. 7.

    http://www.imsglobal.org/question/qti_v2p1pd/examples/items/extended_text.xml

  8. 8.

    In this example, the correspondence between the OWL models and DLs formulas means that the reasoner can be used to test the satisfiability of the questions w.r.t the OWL models too. However, this issue is beyond the scope of this paper.

References

  1. ATL (2006) Atlas Tansformation Language - User Manual, verzion 0.7, ATLAS group, Nant. [Online]. Available: http://www.eclipse.org/gmt/atl/doc/ATL_User{\_}Manual[v0.7].pdf

  2. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., and Patel-Schneider, P. (2003) The Description Logic Handbook-Theory, Implementation and Application, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beshears, F.M. (2004) Open Standards and Open Source Development Strategies for e-Learning.Presentation for IS224 Strategic Computing and Communications Technology 10/2/2003. Retrieved October 11, 2004 from http://istsocrates.berkeley.edu/~fmb/events/sakai-2004-01-12/IS224-2003-10-02.ppt. Educational Technology Services, University of California, Berkeley, CA.

  4. Bezivin, J. (2004) In Search of Basic Principles for Model Driven Architecture, The European Journal for The Informatics Professional, 5(2), 21–24.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Bezivin, J., Jouault, F., and Paliès, J. (2005) Towards Model Transformation Design Patterns. In: Proceedings of the First European Workshop on Model Transformation (EWMT 2005), Rennes, France.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Blackboard (2007) Blackboard. [Online]. Available: http://www.blackboard.com

  7. Dirckze, R. (spec. leader) (2002) Java Metadata Interface (JMI) Specification Version 1.0. [Online]. Available: http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/final/jsr040/index.html

  8. Desirée J B., van Bruggen, J., Hermans, H., Latour, I., Burgers, J., Giesbers B., and Koper, R. (2006) Modeling Assessment for Re-use of Traditional and New Types of Assessment [Online]. Available: http://dspace.ou.nl/bitstream/1820/355/4/modelling-assessment.pdf

  9. EMF (2007) Discover the Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) and Its Dynamic Capabilities. [Online]. Available: http://www.devx.com/Java/Article/29093

  10. Ferrario, M. and Smyth, B. (2001) Collaborative Knowledge Management and Maintenance. In: Proceedings of German Workshop of Case Based Reasoning, pp. 14–15, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gorissen, P. (2003). Quickscan QTI. Retrieved November 15, 2005 from http://www.digiuni.nl/digiuni//download/35303.DEL.306.pdf. De Digitale Universiteit, Utrecht.

  12. Horrocks, I. (1997). Optimizing Tableaux Decision Procedures for Description Logics, PhD Thesis, University of Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  13. IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. (IMS) (2007) Official Site. [Online]. http://www.imsglobal.org

  14. IMS QTI (2006) IMS Question & Test Interoperability. Version 2.1. Public Draft Specification. IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. Retrieved May 2, 2006 from http://www.imsglobal.org/question/index.cfm

  15. Krdzavac, N. and Devedžić, V. (2006) A Tableau Metamodel for Description Logics. In: Proceedings of 13th Workshop on Automated Reasoning (ARW 2006), pp. 7–9, Bristol, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lalos, P., Retalis, S., and Psaromiligkos, Y. (2005) Creating Personalised Quizzes Both to the Learner and to the Access Device Characteristics: The Case of CosyQTI. In: Third International Workshop on Authoring of Adaptive and Adaptable Educational Hypermedia (A3EH), Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lay, S., Pierre, G., IMS Global Learning Consortium (2006b) IMS Question and Test Interoperability Implementation Guide, Version 2.1 Public draft. [Online]. http://www.imsglobal.org/question/qti_v2p1pd/imsqti{\_}implv2p1pd.html

  18. Lay, S., Pierre, G., IMS Global Learning Consortium (2006c) IMS Question and Test Interoperability Overview, Version 2.1 Public draft. [Online]. http://www.imsglobal.org/question/qti_v2p1pd/imsqti{\_}oviewv2p1pd.html

  19. Miller, P. (2004) Interoperability. What Is It and Why Should I Want It?Ariadne, 24. Retrieved March 10, 2004 from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue24/interoperability

  20. Miller, J. and Mukerji, J. (eds.) (2006), MDA Guide Version 1.0.1, OMG, 2003, Retrieved November 25, 2006, from http://www.omg.org/docs/omg/03-06-01.pdf

  21. MOF (2002) Meta Object Facility (MOF) Specification, v1.4, [Online]. Available: http://www.omg.org/docs/formal/02-04-03.pdf

  22. ODM (2003) Ontology Definition Metamodel, Preliminary Revised Submission to OMG RFP ad/2003-03-40 1, 2004. [Online]. Available: http://codip.grci.com/odm/draft

  23. Oracle iLearning (2007) Oracle iLearning. [Online]. Available: http://www.oracle.com/ilearning

  24. Poole, J. D. (2001) Model-Driven Architecture: Vision, Standards and Emerging Technologies. In: Workshop on Metamodeling and Adaptive Object Models ECOOP

    Google Scholar 

  25. QMP (2007) Question Mark Perception. [Online]. Available: http://www.questionmark.com

  26. QVT (2002) Request for Proposal: MOF 2.0 Query/Views/Transformations RFP, OMG Document: ad/2002-04-10 2002. [Online]. Available: http://www.omg.org/docs/ad/02-04-10.pdf

  27. Radenković, S., Krdžavac, N., and Devedžić V. (2007) A QTI Metamodel. In: Proceedings of International Multiconference on Computer Science and Information Technology, ISSN 1896-7094, pp. 1123–1132.

    Google Scholar 

  28. RIVA Technologies, Inc. (2007) e-Test 3. [Online]. Available: http://www.riva.com

  29. Sclater, N. and Low, B. (2002) IMS Question and Test Interoperability: An Idiot’s Guide, CETIS Assessment Special Interest Group Version 0.5, March 2002. [Online]. http://www.assessment.cetis.ac.uk

  30. Simic, G. (2004) The Multi-Courses Tutoring System Design, ComSIS, 1(1), pp. 141–155. [Online]. Available: http://www.comsis.org/ComSIS/Volume01/Papers/GoranSimic.htm.

  31. Sirin, E. and Parsia, B. (2004) An OWL DL Reasoner. In: Proceedings on International Workshop on Description Logics (DL2004), British Columbia, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  32. UML (2007) UML 2.0 Infrastructure Overview. [Online]. Available: http://www.omg.org/issues/UMLSpec.pdf

  33. UML_Profile (2007) Catalog of UML Profile. [Online]. Available: http://www.omg.org/technology/documents/profile_catalog.htm

  34. XMI (2002) OMG XMI Specification, ver. 1.2, OMG Document Formal/02-01-01, 2002. [Online]. Available: http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?formal/2002-01-01.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sonja Radenković .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Radenković, S., Krdžavac, N., Devedžić, V. (2010). An Assessment System on the Semantic Web. In: Devedžić, V., Gaševic, D. (eds) Web 2.0 & Semantic Web. Annals of Information Systems, vol 6. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1219-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1219-0_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-1218-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-1219-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics