Skip to main content

Attentional Control Theory of Anxiety: Recent Developments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Individual Differences in Cognition

Part of the book series: The Springer Series on Human Exceptionality ((SSHE))

Abstract

There have been relatively few attempts to understand the effects of anxiety (whether regarded as a personality dimension or as a mood state) on task performance directly from the perspective of cognitive psychology. However, attentional control theory (Eysenck, Derakshan, Santos, & Calvo, 2007) is an attempt to do precisely that. As is discussed in this chapter, it is assumed that there is an important distinction between positive attentional control and negative attentional control. It is also assumed that anxiety impairs the efficiency of both forms of attentional control. However, the adverse effects of such impaired efficiency on performance can be reduced or eliminated when anxious individuals utilise additional resources or effort. Research that provides general support for these assumptions is discussed, and implications for future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (2001). Is working memory still working? American Psychologist, 56, 851–864.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blankstein, K. R., Flett, G. L., Boase, P., & Toner, B. B. (1990). Thought listing and endorsement measures of self-referential thinking in test anxiety. Anxiety Research, 2, 103–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blankstein, K. R., Toner, B. B., & Flett, G. L. (1989). Test anxiety and the contents of consciousness: Thought-listing and endorsement measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 23, 269–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derakshan, N., Eysenck, M. W., & Ansari, T. L. (in preparation). Testing attentional control theory

    Google Scholar 

  • Derakshan, N., Ansari, T. L., Hansard, M., Shoker, L., & Eysenck, M. W. (2009). Anxiety, inhibition, efficiency, and effectiveness: An investigation using the antisaccade task. Experimental Psychology, 56, 48–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, M. W. (1982). Attention and arousal: Cognition and performance. Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, M. W. (1992). Anxiety: The cognitive perspective. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, M. W., & Calvo, M. G. (1992). Anxiety and performance: The processing efficiency theory. Cognition and Emotion, 6, 409–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, M. W., & Payne, S. (in preparation). Anxiety and processing efficiency assessed by a measure of spare processing capacity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7, 409–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, M. W., Payne, S., & Derakshan, N. (2005). Trait anxiety, visuo-spatial processing, and working memory. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 1214–1228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 101–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Corley, R. P., Young, S. E., DeFries, J. C., & Hewitt, J. K. (2006). Not all executive functions are related to intelligence. Psychological Science, 17, 172–179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, S. B., & Ettinger, U. (2006). The antisaccade task as a research tool in psychopathology: A critical review. Psychophysiology, 43, 302–313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, W. A. (1972). Processing capacity consumed in memory tasks. Psychonomic Science, 29, 272–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex ‘frontal lobe’ tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134–140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, L. W., Davis, M. A., & Hutchings, C. H. (1981). Cognitive and emotional components of anxiety: Literature review and a revised worry-emotionality scale. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 541–555.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, N. P., & Janelle, C. M. (2003). Anxiety and performance: A visual search examination of the processing efficiency theory. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 25, 171–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • NÄ™cka, E. (1999). Learning, automaticity, and attention: An individual differences approach. In P. L. Ackerman, P. C. Kyllonen, & R. D. Roberts (Eds.), Learning and individual differences: Process, trait and content determinants. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nigg, J. T. (2000). On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: Views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 220–246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rapee, R. M. (1993). The utilisation of working memory by worry. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 31, 617–620.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Santos, R., Wall, M. B., & Eysenck, M. W. (submitted). Anxiety and processing efficiency: fMRI evidence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, I. G. (1988). Anxiety, self-preoccupation and attention. Anxiety Research, 1, 3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. E., & Jonides, J. (1999). Storage and executive processes in the frontal lobes. Science, 283, 1657–1661.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wager, T. D., Jonides, J., & Reading, S. (2004). Neuroimaging studies of shifting attention: A meta-analysis. NeuroImage, 22, 1679–1693.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. M., Vickers, J., & Rodrigues, S. (2002). The effects of anxiety on visual search, movement kinematics, and performance in table tennis: A test of Eysenck and Calvo’s processing efficiency theory. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 24, 438–455.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research discussed here was supported by a research grant from the Economic and Social Research Council awarded jointly to Michael W. Eysenck and to Nazanin Derakshan. We are extremely grateful for this support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael W. Eysenck .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eysenck, M.W. (2010). Attentional Control Theory of Anxiety: Recent Developments. In: Gruszka, A., Matthews, G., Szymura, B. (eds) Handbook of Individual Differences in Cognition. The Springer Series on Human Exceptionality. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1210-7_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics