Advertisement

Foundation Laws of Knowledge Dynamics

  • Thomas Andersson
  • Martin G. Curley
  • Piero Formica
Chapter
Part of the Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management book series (ITKM)

Abstract

The coevolution of ideas (the content) and their historical, social, organizational, and institutional forms (the context) has been the mainspring of economic growth throughout history.

It is the flow of energy that makes possible the coevolution that marks one civilization from the next. The energy circuit of the industrial age, such as that of sailing-ship or iron-hulled, ocean-going steamship, differs widely from today.

We live in the “knowledgefication” era in which the flow of energy is a flow of knowledge where innovation is instigated by the ability to create knowledge and manage it.

In a world awash with information, “knowledgefication” creates a difference in the sense that it allows people to discern from dozens of web pages the information needed and to gauge its relevance.

Keywords

Network Code Intellectual Capital Intangible Asset Tangible Asset Knowledge Dynamics 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Amidon D, Formica P, Mercier-Laurent E (eds) (2005) Knowledge economics: emerging principles, practices and policies. Tartu University Press, EstoniaGoogle Scholar
  2. Hampden-Turner C, Trompenaars F (1997) Mastering the infinite game. How East Asian values are transforming business practices. Capstone, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Henig PD (2000) Revenge of the bricks. Red Herring Magazine, 1 AugustGoogle Scholar
  4. Hutton W (2007) Britain should flaunt its knowledge. Financial Times, November 12Google Scholar
  5. Kay J (1995) Foundations of corporate success. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kosko B (1994) Fuzzy thinking. Harper Collins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Miles RE, Snow CC (1992) Causes of failure in network organisations. California Manage Rev 34(4):53–72Google Scholar
  8. Nalebuff BJ, Branderburger AM (1996) Co-opetition. Harper Collins, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Schrange M (1990) Shared minds: the new technologies of collaboration. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Wyllie J (2002) Thomas Edison’s business model, mimeo.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Andersson
    • 1
  • Martin G. Curley
    • 2
  • Piero Formica
    • 3
  1. 1.Jönköping Int. Business School, Jönköping UniversityJönköpingSweden
  2. 2.Intel Corporation and National University of IrelandMaynoothIreland
  3. 3.Jönköping University International Entrepreneurship AcademyBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations