Skin Tightening of the Arms and Legs with Radiofrequency and Broadband Light

  • Matthew J. Mahlberg
  • Julie K. Karen
  • Elizabeth K. Hale
Chapter

Abstract

With increasing age, skin that was once full and firm begins to sag, developing laxity and redundancy. Traditionally, a surgical procedure was required for treatment of this laxity as in rhytidectomy, browlift, or brachioplasty. More recently, technological advances have shifted the treatments toward nonsurgical alternatives in place of plastic surgery. Further refinement toward nonablative tissue remodeling has proven popular because of its efficacy and markedly reduced downtime and complication rate. The major emphasis in the field of nonablative tissue remodeling has been on facial rejuvenation; however, these techniques can be applied to other areas of the body as well. Of particular interest has been the development of the nonsurgical techniques for areas of loose skin on the posterior upper arms and around the knees, sites of concern particularly for many women. These areas of tissue redundancy are troublesome as they can be difficult to otherwise treat and are not necessarily a reflection of body weight or thinness. Certain devices, particularly radiofrequency (RF) and broadband light sources, have demonstrated utility for tightening and nonsurgical contouring of mild to moderate skin laxity in these regions.

Keywords

Corticosteroid 

References

  1. 1.
    Alster TS, Lupton JR. Nonablative cutaneous remodeling using radiofrequency devices. Clin Dermatol. 2007;25:487–387.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zelickson BD, Kist D, Bernstein E, et al. Histologic and ultrastructural evaluation of the effects of radiofrequency based nonablative dermal remodeling device: a pilot study. Arch Dermatol. 2004;140:204–387.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gold MH, Goldman MP, Rao J, Carcamo AS, Ehrlich M. Treatment of wrinkles and elastosis using vacuum-assisted bipolar radiofrequency heating of the dermis. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33:300–387.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Narurkar VA. Lasers, light sources, and radiofrequency devices for skin rejuvenation. Semm Cutan Med Surg. 2006;25:145–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goldberg DJ. New collagen formation after dermal remodeling with intense pulsed light sources. J Cutan Laser Ther. 2000;2:59–387.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gold MH. Tissue tightening: a hot topic utilizing deep dermal heating. J Drugs Dermatol. 2007;12:1238–387.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alster TS, Tanzi E. Improvement of neck and cheek laxity with a nonablative radiofrequency device: a lifting experience. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30:503–387.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fitzpatrck R, Geronemus R, Goldberg D, Kaminer M, Kilmer S, Ruiz-Esparza J. Multicenter study of noninvasive radiofrequency for periorbital tissue tightening. Lasers Surg Med. 2003;33:232–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Narukar V. Full thickness permanent scars from bulk heating using an infrared light source. Lasers Surg Med. 2006;S18:S96.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Laubach HJ, Manstein D. Histologic evaluation of minimally invasive radiofrequency exposure. Lasers Surg Med. 2006;S18:S28.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ross EV, Thomas BC, Clinton TS, Paithankar DY. Variable depth laser skin heating and tightening. Lasers Surg Med. 2006;S18:S96.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Alam M, White L, Majzoub R, Martin N, Yoo S. Safety and efficacy of transcutaneous ultrasound for forehead, cheek, and neck tissue tightening. Laser Surg Med. 2007;S19:S56.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew J. Mahlberg
    • 1
  • Julie K. Karen
    • 1
  • Elizabeth K. Hale
    • 1
  1. 1.Ronald O. Perelman Department of DermatologyNew York University School of MedicineNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations