Skip to main content

Conceptual Framework for Volunteer Action and Acts of Solidarity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mexican Solidarity

Abstract

This book is the result of research carried out with the hope of taking the first steps toward discovering and opening society’s eyes to the universe of both formal and informal practices of solidarity in Mexico and the characteristics that define them. This work is the product of a study that the Centro Mexicano para la Filantropía, A.C., (Cemefi, Mexican Center for Philanthropy) decided to encourage in order to understand, explain, make known, and eventually promote the actions undertaken by the citizens of this country in solidarity with others and as volunteers.

In the course of these pages it will be possible to outline some of the main volunteer activity and acts of solidarity practiced by Mexicans. Basic coordinates will be traced to contribute to elucidating where and how they are distributed in the country. Also, the value of the time this voluntary work represents will be covered. It will also be possible to observe the map of regional differences and become acquainted with a diagnosis of different ways in which people collaborate, both horizontally and vertically, in social organizations. The dynamics of voluntary actions of solidarity inside organizations – the privileged place of analysis in order to locate the volunteer – and outside of them will also be examined. It is important to point out that, as we shall see later, there are subjects who practice solidarity with others outside formal spheres and the organizations of civil society, and this activity is also important to recognize and validate within the scope of social investigation. This book is a joint effort, as well as an interdisciplinary effort, in connection with a shared concern: getting to know the many-sided and, until now, little explored trend of volunteers and voluntary actions of solidarity in Mexico. Hence, the purpose of this research is to analyze these activities. Both the subject of study and the unit of analysis of these actions are in and of themselves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See the book: Más allá del individualismo: el tercer sector en Perú (Portocarrero et al. 2002, 20–76), which explains the main economic theories about the sector, such as: (1) those referring to the existence of the sector (the theory of public goods, Hansmann’s confidence hypothesis, theories of public choice, theories of industrial organization, the theory of consumer control, business and social offer theories), and (2) those that analyze how the state and the market operate in relation to social organizations (altruistic behavior, the function of ideology, stakeholders). It also presents social theories that have to do with the sector we are concerned with: (1) proposals that attempt to explain, from an overall perspective, how historical and social coordinates influence the nature and dynamics of the sector (the theory of social origins, the third sector of developing countries), and (2) the other theoretical approximations that concentrate on the specific role of some social actors, such as the church and the state (the theory of the welfare state, the theory of interdependence, religion, and the third sector).

  2. 2.

    The main objective of this investigation is to study volunteer actions and acts of solidarity by Mexicans. Formal and informal organizational structures serve as a framework for performing the different roles that individuals play within them. Civil organizations in Mexico have been well studied and are not the subject of this investigation. However, Chapter 5 of this work presents an analysis of the non-profit organizations (NPO) involved in this study in terms of their aims, internal structure, operational mechanisms, funding mechanisms, and the decision-making process on the part of their members.

  3. 3.

    NPO, nonprofit organization. This term will be used from now on as a group reference for this investigation.

  4. 4.

    The first two chapters of this book explain the social and theoretical genesis of social assistance in Mexico, as also the evolution of the ideas of promotion and development, as understood and interpreted from a Latin American, especially, Mexican perspective.

  5. 5.

    This document does not analyze these activities. In this sense, it may be considered that the action arising in this framework was not entirely voluntary, but rather constituted a sort of “pseudo-volunteer work”, because a certain degree of compulsion existed. The wives of public officials preside over these activities in many states through governmental entities or federal institutions. Nevertheless, this category is included in the classification of volunteer activity in Mexico, because, even though this first premise is true, it is also the case that this has been a way that many subjects linked to the government bureaucracy who began within this framework have been introduced to and have continued with these kinds of activities.

  6. 6.

    This law was promoted by several Civil Society Organizations: the Fundación Miguel Alemán (Miguel Alemán Foundation), Convergencia de Organismos Civiles por la Democracia (Convergence of Civil Organizations for Democracy), Foro de Apoyo Mutuo (Mutual Support Forum) and Cemefi, among others.

  7. 7.

    (2002) V Encounter of the International Society for Third Sector Research (istr) in Cape Town, South Africa. There was an attempt to present a brief analysis on the state–civil society relationship in Mexico from the democratic transition until the change of government in the year 2000 in the panel: Civil Society, Citizen Participation and the Dawn of a New Era: the Third Sector in Mexico in Light of a New Political Regime.

  8. 8.

    See Verduzco, List, and Salamon (2001), Perfil del sector no lucrativo en México, for the main findings of the comparative study on the scope, structure, financing, and role of the non-profit sector in Mexico. In the comparative study by John Hopkins University, five parameters were considered to select the organizations that would be used for measuring the sector. These are: private (institutionally separated from the state); organizations (possessing an institutional structure and presence); that do not distribute benefits; are autonomous (essentially controlling their own activities); and have volunteer participation (membership is not legally imposed and they attract a certain level of voluntary contributions of time and money).

  9. 9.

    See Moreno (2005), Nuestros valores. Los mexicanos en México y en Estados Unidos al inicio del siglo XXI . Banamex. Chapter seven contains the author’s conclusions about confidence, social capital, and solidarity, as well as volunteer activity and altruism among Mexicans.

  10. 10.

    http://www.gobernacion.gob.mx/encup.

  11. 11.

    Medición del servicio voluntario: una guía práctica. Independent Sector y Voluntarios de las Naciones Unidas (2001). This guide classifies them as managed or unmanaged.

  12. 12.

    For more information on this case, see the study: The Size and Scope of the Non-Profit Sector in South Africa, developed by Swilling and Russell (2002). “Informal” groups mainly made up of volunteers represent 53% of the non-profit sector in that country.

  13. 13.

    Report of the Comisión de Desarrollo Social. December, 2000. El papel del Voluntariado en la promoción del desarrollo social in : http://www.iyv.org/iyv_span/policy/unitednations/csd_document/csddocument_htm/csd_document_span.htm

  14. 14.

    Salamon et al. (1999). Nuevo estudio del sector emergente: resumen. This comparative study of 22 countries, including Mexico, presents some facets of voluntary individual participation. These authors argue that the size of the non-profit sector is a good indicator of the number of formal volunteers in existence. In another related article, Volunteering in Cross-National Perspective: Evidence from Twenty-four Countries (2003), by Salamon and Sokolowski, the findings reveal that in countries where the government spends more on social services for its citizens, there are also a greater number of volunteers. The authors explain that volunteer actions are concentrated in two areas of activity: the area of service to others –which is the Mexican case – and the expressive area – which includes cultural, recreational, and lobbying activities. This international study indicated that volunteer actions and acts of solidarity like those included in this investigation need to be studied deeply to better understand the non-profit sector.

  15. 15.

    See Butcher (1999). “La solidaridad organizada: el voluntariado social como agente de cambio social en México”, in Sociedad Civil, for an analysis of this definition and for a description of volunteer action in Mexico both inside and outside formal organizational structures.

  16. 16.

    www.risolidaria.org.ar. Fascículo del Tercer Sector 04. “Todo lo que usted necesita saber sobre Voluntariado”, Tercer Sector (2004).

  17. 17.

    In fact, the term “solidarity” has it origin in Roman law, where it was used to describe a type of legal situation in which individual subjects bound themselves as if they were a single subject, and therefore this type of obligation was called obligatio in solidum.

  18. 18.

    See Valenzuela’s text (2003), La noción de solidaridad, which undertakes a broad exploration of ideas and of the term “solidarity”. In this theoretical-conceptual essay, the main theoreticians of the subject of solidarity are mentioned: Aristotle, Smith, Locke, Hume, Kant, Durkheim, de Tocqueville, Scheler, Rorty, Habermas, and Luhman, as well as mentioning the connotation it has in the current psycho-social trends of Eisenberg and Bandura, and the basis of Freud’s psychoanalysis, also going into Kohlberg’s y Piaget’s moral training of individuals. It also includes an extensive bibliographical review of the use of the concept of solidarity over time, identifying the meanings and shades of meaning with which it has been used and presenting, by way of empirical evidence, some practical acceptations of the notion of solidarity expressed more or less explicitly in the Solidarity movement and other contemporary scientific theories.

  19. 19.

    To delve more deeply into the concept of social capital, see Robert Putnam (2000), Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, which emphasizes networks of reciprocity based on confidence and mutual aid, and explains that there are two kinds of linkages in the formation of these networks. The first occurs among individuals who are similar, with mutual and common interests, which is called bonding social capital, and refers to a close bond between equals. The second is called bridging social capital, and involves a bridge or connection between different and distinct people that goes beyond an intimate relation between peers. Putnam and Fieldstein’s work (2003), Better Together: Restoring the American Community, should also be consulted, which establishes that the expression of bridging social capital is indispensable for the development of tolerance and openness in the construction of democratic societies. Both forms of relationship are considered by these authors as key to achieving active and inclusive participation in a democracy.

  20. 20.

    www.risolidaria.org.ar. Fascículos del Tercer Sector 04. “Todo lo que usted necesita saber sobre Voluntariado”, Tercer Sector (2004).

  21. 21.

    As expressed in an article in the Argentinean newspaper La Nación, of April 21, 2000: “What elements does man have, at this point of transition from one millennium to another, to confront these evils, to contribute to the path toward a less unjust and more balanced society? He has, of course, his conscience and the values that illuminate it. Among these values, one of the most important is solidarity, understood as a generous force that moves human beings to do their utmost, unselfishly, to help their fellow man. Only to the degree to which people with more resources get organized to provide help and solidarity to the most unprotected sectors of the population will it be possible to advance toward a civilization less chastened by inequities and injustices.”

  22. 22.

    For the ensav, 2005, the following documents, among others, were used for reference: La medición del servicio voluntario: una guía práctica (Independent Sector y Voluntarios de las Naciones Unidas, 2001), Encuesta Nacional de Donaciones y Trabajo Voluntario 2002 (Portocarrero et al.), Estudio sobre Trabajo Voluntario (Gallup 2000, Argentina), the survey Giving and Volunteering in the United States, (Independent Sector, 1996) and the survey Giving and Volunteering USA (Independent Sector, 2001), the book The Size and Scope of the Non-profit Sector in South Africa (Swilling and Russell, 2002), Encuesta Nacional sobre el Uso del Tiempo (2002, México), and Encuesta de Acciones Voluntarias del Manual de Cuentas Nacionales de Instituciones sin Fines de Lucro (Universidad de John Hopkins, February, 2005, USA).

  23. 23.

    Arredondo (1997) in “Naturaleza, desarrollo y tipología de la sociedad civil organizada” in Sociedad Civil, no. 1, vol. II, pp 164–184, offers a classification of civil organizations. A typology of civil associations by Alberto Olvera appears in: “Representaciones e ideologías de los organismos civiles en México: crítica de la selectividad y rescate del sentido de la idea de sociedad civil”, pp 31–37, in Cadena Roa, J. (2004) (Coordinador) Las organizaciones civiles mexicanas hoy, which presents different forms of civil association in Mexico; the same author comments on the difficulties of covering the entire gamut of possible combinations of citizen associative activities. The typology in our study covers 12 spheres of action which were selected because of being considered as having the greatest volunteer work content.

  24. 24.

    Salamon and Anheier (1999), Nuevo estudio del sector emergente: Resumen, p. 3, Baltimore: Universidad de John Hopkins, Instituto de Estudios Políticos, Centro de Estudios sobre Sociedad Civil.

  25. 25.

    The ISIC and, hence, the ICNPO, classify organizations according to their main economic activity, i.e., the one that consumes the largest part of their operational expenses. So if an organization carries out activities in more than one area, it will be classified based on the area with the greatest operational expenditures. This is particularly important in the case of Mexico, since there are many organizations that work simultaneously in several areas or in areas of activity that are not easily identifiable.

  26. 26.

    www.cemefi.org

References

  • Alduncin y Asociados. 2003. “El voluntariado en el Valle de México”. In: Este país, 47–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso J (1996) La sociedad civil en óptica gramsciana. In: Sociedad Civil, no. 1, vol 1. pp 11–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Arredondo V (1997) Naturaleza, desarrollo y tipología de la sociedad civil organizada. In: Sociedad Civil, no. 1, vol II. pp 165–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayertz K (1999) Four Uses of ‘Solidarity’. In: Bayertz K (ed) Solidarity. Kluwer Academic Publisers, London, pp 3–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Becerra T, Berlanga R (2003) Voluntariado en México: una nueva visión. Noriega Editores, México

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobbio N et al (1988) Diccionario de Política, vol II. Siglo XXI Editores, México

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolos S (1997) ¿Actores sociales o actores políticos? El dilema de la democratización. In: Prometeo, Revista mexicana de psicología humanista y desarrollo humano, verano, pp 15–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown E (1999) Assessing the value of volunteer activity. In: Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly, no. 1, vol 28, March, pp 5–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher J (1999) La solidaridad organizada: el voluntariado social como agente de cambio social en México. In: Sociedad Civil, no. 9, vol. III, pp 51–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher J (2002). A New Perspective in Voluntarism and Citizen Participation in Mexico: Recreating Civil Society/Government Relationships. Panel: Civil Society, Citizen Participation and the Dawn of a New Era: the Third Sector in Mexico in Light of a New Political Regime, V ISTR Conference, Cape Town, South Africa. (http://www.istr.org/conferences/capetown/volume/index.html)

  • Butcher J (2003) A humanistic perspective on the volunteer-recipient relationship. In: Dekker P, Halman L (eds) The values of volunteering: cross-cultural perspectives. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, pp 111–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher J (2004) Building Citizenship and Voluntary Participation in Mexico: Social and Economic Implications from a National Study, VI ISTR Conference, Toronto, Canada. (http://www.istr.org/conferences/toronto/workingpapers/index.html)

  • Butcher J, Serna MG (coord.) (2006) El Tercer Sector en México: perspectivas de investigación. Cemefi-Instituto de Investigaciones Dr. José María Luis Mora, México

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro C (2005) Manual de disposiciones legales y fiscales de las organizaciones de la sociedad civil en México. Cemefi, México

    Google Scholar 

  • Cemefi (1994) La fundaciones norteamericanas y las instituciones no lucrativas en México. Cemefi, México

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker P, Halman L (eds) (2003) The values of volunteering: cross-cultural perspectives. Kluwer Academic. Plenum Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler A (1998) Whither the third sector? A response to Stelle James. Voluntas 9(3):201–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallup (2000) Estudio sobre trabajo voluntario en Argentina. Informe, noviembre

    Google Scholar 

  • Govaart MM et al (ed) (2001). Volunteering worldwide. Institute of Care and Welfare, Holland, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Handbook on Non-Profit Institutions in the System of National Accounts (2003). Appendix As(iii). United Nations

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy C (1988) Understanding Voluntary Organizations. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Independent Sector y Voluntarios de las Naciones Unidas (2001) La medición del servicio voluntario: una guía práctica. Independent sector, Washington, DC. (http://www.independentsector.org/programs/research/toolkit/IYVspanish.pdf)

  • Independent Sector y Voluntarios de las Naciones Unidas (1996, 2001) Giving and volunteering in the United States

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart R et al (2004) Human beliefs and values: 2000 world values survey. Siglo XXI Editores, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  • Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática (2002) Encuesta Nacional sobre el Uso del Tiempo. INEGI, México

    Google Scholar 

  • Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (2005) Encuesta Nacional de Filantropía. ITAM, Mexico. (http://www.filantropia.itam.mx)

  • Investigator (2005) Placing a value on volunteer time. In: RKG Center for philanthropy and community service, no. 1, vol. 2, U.T. Austin, Fall, Texas. (http://www.rkgcenter.org/investigator/), (http://www.serviceleader.org/investigator/)

  • Jerez A (coord.) (1997). ¿Trabajo voluntario o participación? Elementos para una sociología del Tercer sector. Tecnos, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Layton M (2006) ¿Cómo se paga el capital social? In: Foreign Affairs en Español, no. 2, vol. 6, pp 163–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Manual de Formación de Voluntarios (2002) Cultura de la solidaridad y voluntariado. (http://www.crefes.net/formacion/mdidacticos/descargas/asb/manual_voluntarios.pdf)

  • Marina S (2002) Las sociedades de San Vicente de Paul. In: Re-vista, giving and volunteering in the Americas, Spring, Harvard Review of Latin America

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijs LCPM (1997) Management van vrijwilligersorganizaties. NOV-publicaties, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Méndez J (1997). El Tercer sector y las organizaciones civiles en México: evolución reciente y perspectivas. In: Sociedad Civil, no. 1, vol. II, pp 103–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Méndez J (coord.) (1998) Organizaciones civiles y políticas públicas en México y Centroamérica. Miguel Ángel Porrúa, México

    Google Scholar 

  • Morán A (1997) El Futuro del trabajo, el empleo y el sector voluntario. In: Jerez A (coord.) ¿Trabajo voluntario o participación? Elementos para una sociología del Tercer sector. Tecnos, Madrid, pp 78–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno A (2005) Nuestros valores: los mexicanos en México y en Estados Unidos al inicio del siglo XXI. Banamex, México

    Google Scholar 

  • Olvera A (1999) Los modos de la recuperación contemporánea de la idea de sociedad civil. In: Olvera A (coord.) La sociedad civil de la teoría a la realidad. El Colegio de México, México, pp 27–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Olvera A (2004) Representaciones e ideologías de los organismos civiles en México: crítica de la selectividad y rescate del sentido de la idea de sociedad civil. In: Cadena Roa J (coord.) Las organizaciones civiles mexicanas hoy. UNAM, CIIICH, México, pp 23–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Organización de las Naciones Unidas (2000) El papel del voluntariado en la promoción del desarrollo social. Reporte de la Comisión de Desarrollo Social. http://www.iyv.org/iyv_span/policy/unitednations/csd_document/csddocument_htm/csd_document_span.htm

  • Organización de las Naciones Unidas (2000) El papel del voluntariado en la promoción del desarrollo social. Consejo Económico y Social. (http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N00/797/10/PDF/N0079710.pdf?OpenElement)

  • Organización de las Naciones Unidas (2005) Seguimiento de la observancia del Año Internacional del Voluntario. Sexagésimo periodo de sesiones, tema 64 del programa provisional, julio 18. Version in Spanish

    Google Scholar 

  • Patronato Nacional de Promotores Voluntarios (1974) La acción voluntaria en el contexto histórico de la asistencia social. Gustavo Casasola, México

    Google Scholar 

  • Portocarrero, F. et al (2002) Más allá del individualismo: el tercer sector en Perú Universidad del Pacífico, Perú

    Google Scholar 

  • Plan Nacional de Desarrollo (2007–2012) Poder Ejecutivo Federal, Gobierno de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos, Presidencia de la República, México

    Google Scholar 

  • Plan Nacional de Desarrollo (2000-2006) Poder Ejecutivo Federal, Gobierno de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos, Presidencia de la República, México

    Google Scholar 

  • Portocarrero F et al (2004) Voluntarios, donantes y ciudadanos en el Perú: reflexiones a partir de una encuesta. Universidad de Pacífico, Perú

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam R (2000) Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam R, Feldstein L (2003) Better together: restoring the American community. Simon and Shuster, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Reygadas R (1998) Abriendo veredas, iniciativas públicas y sociales de las redes de organizaciones civiles. Convergencia de Organismos Civiles por la Democracia, México

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon L, Anheier H (1996) The emerging sector. The John Hopkins University, Institute for Policy Studies, Civil Society Center of Studies, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon L, Anheier H (1999) Nuevo estudio del sector emergente: resumen. In: Proyecto de estudio comparativo del sector no lucrativo (Fase II). The Johns Hopkins University, Institute for Policy Studies, Civil Society Center of Studies, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon L, Sokolowski W (2003) Institutional roots of volunteering. In: Dekker P, Halman L (eds) The values of volunteering: cross-cultural perspectives. Kluwer Academic, Plenum Publishers, New York, NY, pp 71–90

    Google Scholar 

  • San Juan Victoria C (1999) Tendencias de la sociedad civil en México: la puja del poder y la sociedad a fin de siglo. In: Olvera A (coord.) La sociedad civil: de la teoría a la realidad. El Colegio de México, México, pp 157–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Secretaría de Gobernación (2001, 2003, 2005) Encuesta Nacional sobre Cultura Política y Prácticas Ciudadanas. Segob, Mexico. (http://www.segob.gob.mx)

  • Secretaría de Gobierno de Chile (2002) Voluntariados en Chile: lo plural y lo diverso. Sistematización de antecedentes generales en Chile y el exterior. Chile, Lom Ediciones

    Google Scholar 

  • Serna MG, Monsiváis A (2006) Investigar el Tercer Sector. In: Butcher J, Serna MG (coord.) El Tercer Sector en México: perspectivas de investigación. Cemefi – Instituto de Investigaciones Dr. José María Luis Mora, México, pp 26–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith M (1989) Taking volunteerism into the 21st century: some conclusions of the American red cross volunteer study 2000. J Volunt Adm III(1):3–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Swilling M, Russell B (2002) The size and scope of the non-profit sector in South Africa. P&DM, University of the Witwatersrand, CCS, University of Natal, South Africa

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapia M, Robles G (2006) Retos institucionales del marco legal y financiamiento a las organizaciones de la sociedad civil. Alternativas y Capacidades, México

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson A, Toro O (1999) El voluntariado social en América Latina: tendencias, influencias, espacios y lecciones aprendidas. In: Sociedad Civil, no. 9, vol. III. pp 27–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville A (1989) La democracia en América. Alianza, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Valenzuela R (2003) La noción de solidaridad. In: Portocarrero F, Sanborn C (eds) De la caridad a la solidaridad: filantropía y voluntariado en el Perú. Universidad del Pacífico, Centro de Investigación, Perú, pp 503–534

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Daal HJ (1990) Vrijwilligerswerk. In: Informe le hule in Nederlands. NIMAWO, Den Haag

    Google Scholar 

  • Verduzco G, List R, Salamon L (2001) Perfil del sector no lucrativo en México. Cemefi – The John Hopkins University. Institute for Policy Studies. Civil Society Center of Studies, México

    Google Scholar 

  • Verduzco G (2003) Organizaciones no lucrativas: visión de su trayectoria en México. El Colegio de México-Cemefi, México

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisbrod B (1974) Towards a theory of the non-profit sector in a three sector economy. In: Phelps ES (ed) Altruism, morality and economic theory. Russel Sage, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkison-Maposa et al (2006) The poor philanthropist. The International Business School in Africa, Africa. (http://www.gsb.uct.ac.za/gsbwebb/userfiles/Poor_philanthropist_screen.pdf)

  • Young I (2000) Inclusion and democracy. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Web Sites

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacqueline Butcher .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Butcher, J. (2010). Conceptual Framework for Volunteer Action and Acts of Solidarity. In: Butcher, J. (eds) Mexican Solidarity. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1078-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics