Skip to main content

Emission Market at the End of the Commitment Period

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Global Warming

Part of the book series: Green Energy and Technology ((GREEN))

  • 4474 Accesses

Abstract

We have several emission trading schemes at work currently and one eminent market among them is the one for GHG emissions under Kyoto Protocol starting 2009. For emissions to be tradable, property right must be securely set. Especially monitoring has to be reliable and timely, and leakage must be taken care of adequately. But this in turn implies that there is a discrepancy between the period where the amount of emission is ascertained and the period during which trading is supposedly bringing efficiency to the emission reduction. For instance, EU-ETS ended its first trading period at the end of 2007, but the emission level becomes available only after several months passed. Therefore, the so-called trueup period is necessary so that trading has to go on until the emission data are finalized. In the case of EU-ETS, the emission until 2007 can be traded till April 2008, and similar trueup period is set aside for the first commitment period of Kyoto Protocol.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Almgren, Robert, and Neil Criss, 2000, Optimal execution of portfolio transactions, Journal of Risk, 3, 5–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almgren, Robert, 2003, Optimal execution with nonlinear impact functions and tradingenhanced risk, Applied Mathematical Finance, 10, 1–18.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bertsimas, Dimitris, and Andrew W. Lo, 1998, Optimal control of execution costs, Journal of Financial Markets, 1, 1–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryosuke Ishii, 2008, Optimal Execution in a Market with Small Investors, KIER discussion paper series, Kyoto Institute of Economic Research, Discussion Paper No.653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert S. Kyle, 1985, Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading, Econometrica, Vol. 53, No. 6, 1315–1336.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, Gur, and Werner Stanzl, 2000, Optimal liquidity trading, Yale ICF Working Paper No. 00–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obizhaeva, Anna, and Jiang Wang, 2005, Optimal trading strategy and supply/demand dynamics, AFA 2006 Boston Meetings Paper.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ishii, R., Imai, H. (2010). Emission Market at the End of the Commitment Period. In: Dincer, I., Hepbasli, A., Midilli, A., Karakoc, T. (eds) Global Warming. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1017-2_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1017-2_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-1016-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-1017-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics