Advertisement

Global Warming pp 241-253 | Cite as

Effects of Fuel Consumption of Commercial Turbofans on Global Warming

  • Onder Turan
  • T. Hikmet Karakoc
Chapter
Part of the Green Energy and Technology book series (GREEN)

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to parametrically investigate the fuel consumption effect of commercial turbofans on global warming. In this regard, of the important parameters, specific fuel consumption of commercial turbofans is taken into consideration. In order to minimize the effect of fuel consumption on global warming, the values of engine design parameters are optimized for maintaining minimum specific fuel consumption (SFC*, g/kN s) of high-bypass turbofan engine under different flight conditions and design criteria. The backbones of optimization approach consisted of elitism-based genetic algorithm coupled with real parametric cycle analysis of a turbofan engine. For solving optimization problem a new software program is developed in MATLAB, while objective function is determined for minimizing the specific fuel consumption by considering parameters such as the fan pressure ratio (π f ), bypass ratio (α), and the fuel heating value [h PR (kJ/kg)].

Keywords

Flight Condition Solve Optimization Problem Exergy Efficiency Specific Fuel Consumption Turbofan Engine 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anand MS, Priddin CH (2001) Combustion CFD. A Key driver to reducing development cost and time. Fifteenth International Symposium on Air Breathing Engines, Bangalore. India.Google Scholar
  2. Aviationnow (2007) http://www.aviationnow.com/media/pdf/spec_04_gas_turbines.pdf. Access date: March 20.
  3. Boeing (2007) http://www.boeing.com Access date: November 20.
  4. Borguet, S, Kelner, V, Leonard, O (2007) Cycle optimization of a turbine engine: an approach based on genetic algorithms; http://www.ulg.ac.be /turbo/research/paper/ NCTAM2006.pdf>, Access date: November 20.
  5. CFM56 (2007) http://www.geae.com, Access date: September 12.
  6. Cumpsty, N (2000) Jet propulsion. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dagaut P, Cathonette, M (2006) The ignition, oxidation, and combustion of kerosene: A review of experimental and kinetic modeling, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 32: 48–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edwards, T, Maurice, LQ (2001) Surrogate mixtures to represent complex aviation and rocket fuels. Journal of Propulsion and Power 17: 461–6.Google Scholar
  9. Grondin, G, Kelner, V, Ferrand, P, Moreau, S (2005) Robust design and parametric performance study of an automotive fan blade by coupling multi-objective genetic optimization and flow parameterization. Proc. of the International Congress on Fluid Dynamics Applications in Ground Transportation, Lyon, France.Google Scholar
  10. Guibet, JC (1999) Fuels and engines. Paris: Editions Technic.Google Scholar
  11. Holland, J (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar
  12. ICAO (1999) Adopts new aircraft engine emissions and noise standards. Council of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO).Google Scholar
  13. Koroneos, C, Dompros, AR, Moussiopoulos, N (2007) Advantages of use of hydrogen fuel as compared to kerosene. Conservation and Recycling 44(2): 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mari, C (2001) Trends in the technological development of aero engines: an overview. Fifteenth International Symposium on Air Breathing Engines, Bangalore, India.Google Scholar
  15. Mattingly, J (1996) Elements of gas turbine propulsion. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  16. Mattingly, J (2006) Elements of propulsion: gas turbines and rockets. AIAA Education series, USA.Google Scholar
  17. Midilli, A, Dincer, I, Rosen, MA (2005) On hydrogen and hydrogen energy strategies II: future projections affecting global stability and unrest. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 9: 273–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nightingale, P (2000) The product-process-organization relationship in complex development projects. Research Policy 29: 913–930, Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Oates, GC (1997) Aerothermodynamics of gas turbine and rocket propulsion. AIAA Education series, USA.Google Scholar
  20. Pierret, S (2005) Multiobjectives and multidisciplinary optimization of three-dimensional turbomachinery blades. Proc. of the 6th World Congress of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.Google Scholar
  21. Robins, SR (1996) The Trent program. A further step in engineering evolution. Christopher Hilton Lecture at the Royal Institute of Engineers.Google Scholar
  22. Rolls Royce (2007) www.rollsroyce.com/civilaerospace. Access date: March 18.
  23. Schipper, Y, Rietveld, P (1997) Economics and environmental effects of airline deregulation. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 97: 031/3.Google Scholar
  24. Turan, O (2007) Optimization of turbofan engines with elitism-based genetic algorithm method. Doctoral Thesis, Anadolu University, Natural and Applied Sciences.Google Scholar
  25. Violi, A, Yan, S, Eddings, EG, Sarofim, AF, Granata, S, Favarelli, T (2002) Experimental formulation and kinetic model for JP-8 surrogate mixture. Combustion Science and Technology, 174 (11&12): 399–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Onder Turan
    • 1
  • T. Hikmet Karakoc
    • 1
  1. 1.Anadolu UniversityEskisehirTurkey

Personalised recommendations