Abstract
This chapter serves as an integrative summary research study relying on the results obtained from the three previous simulation studies discussed in this book so far. More precisely, a bottom-up and a top-down project tracking approach within a corrective action framework is compared and general summary conclusions are presented. The top-down tracking approach relies on a traditional Earned Value Management (EVM) system investigated in detail in chapter 4, while the bottom-up tracking mechanism makes use of the well-known Schedule Risk Analysis (SRA) method discussed in chapter 5
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vanhoucke, M. (2009). Top-down or Bottom-up Project Tracking. In: Measuring Time. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 136. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1014-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1014-1_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-1013-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-1014-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)