Abstract
In this chapter, I review the data considered in my analysis. The data employed is a compilation of annual tax enforcement, criminal investigation, socioeconomic, and political statistics for each US state from 1977 to 2001. The tax collections and examination variables rely on data reported in the Annual Report of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, IRS Data Book, and IRS Statistics of Income Bulletin. I begin with a graphical analysis of several variables used in the statistical models, as well as other factors collected and considered in the course of this study. I present these graphs for the period beginning in 1977 and ending in 2001. In some cases, the graphs contain data for a shorter period of time if the underlying factors were not available for the full period. I discuss, in turn, the socioeconomic factors, the audit examination factors, the CI activity factors, and a few factors that were not used in this study.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In the appendix to this chapter, I present a geographic representation of the same figures discussed in the chapter. Note that the US maps are for the period 1997–2001 and not every figure have been presented.
- 2.
Total sentences can be greater than total prosecutions for certain years since a sentence can occur in a different fiscal year from the year of prosecution for that same crime.
- 3.
It may be argued that every CI case is different from every other case. Of course, the specifics of a given case may make it a more or less representative case for CI and could affect the perceptions formed by the public. Indeed, the amount of media coverage may be completely different for different cases, even though each receives some media coverage. These issues are masked, to some degree, by aggregate econometric studies. They may be relevant if they create errors in measurement, which can attenuate measured statistical significance, or if they lead to biases in aggregation. I proceeded using counts of cases as the relevant proxy as previous studies have done empirically with audit examinations rates.
- 4.
The media variable I obtained provided the number of cases that received media attention and the type of media coverage given (i.e. newspaper, television, or radio). However, the data did not reveal the amount of media attention a case received.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dubin, J.A. (2012). The Data. In: The Causes and Consequences of Income Tax Noncompliance. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0907-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0907-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0906-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0907-7
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)