Skip to main content

Surgical Treatment of Aortic Valve Disease in the Elderly

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1137 Accesses

Abstract

Senile aortic stenosis (AS) remains the most frequent acquired valve disease in the elderly population and has an estimated prevalence of 4.6% in adults more than 75 years of age. With the increase in geriatric population, it is estimated that the number of patients requiring evaluation for surgical treatment for AS will correspondingly dramatically increase. Conventional open aortic valve replacement utilizing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) remains the standard of care with excellent results. Newer innovative valve replacement techniques which do not require CPB (off-pump left ventricular to descending aortic conduits and transcatheter aortic valve implantation) may provide adequate relief of aortic stenosis with reduced morbidity and mortality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Census US. http://www.census.gov/population/www/projections/index.html. Accessed 20 Oct 2009.

  2. Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, Gottdiener JS, Scott CG, Enriquez-Sarano M, et al. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet. 2006;368:1005–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Iung B, Cachier A, Baron G, et al. Decision-making in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis: why are so many denied surgery? Eur Heart J. 2005;26:2714–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Filsoufi F, Rahmanian PB, Castillo JG, Chikwe J, Silvary G, Adams DH. Excellent early and late outcomes of aortic valve replacement in people aged 80 and older. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56:255–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Thourani VH, Myung R, Kilgo P, et al. Long-term outcomes after isolated aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: a modern prospective. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86:1458–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sundt TM, Bailey MS, Moon MR, et al. Quality of life after aortic valve replacement at the age of > 80 years. Circulation. 2000;102:III-70–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chukwuemeka A, Borger MA, Ivanov J, Armstrong S, Feindel CM, David TE. Valve surgery in octogenarians: a safe option with good medium-term results. J Heart Valve Dis. 2006;15:191–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stoica SC, Cafferty F, Kitcat J, et al. Octogenarians undergoing cardiac surgery outlive their peers: a case for early referral. Heart. 2006;92:503–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kohl P, Kerzmann A, Lahaye L, Gerard P, Limet R. Cardiac surgery in octogenarians: peri-operative outcome and long-term results. Eur Heart J. 2001;22:1235–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Varadarajan P, Kapoor N, Bansal RC, Pai RG. Clinical profile and natural history of 453 nonsurgically managed patients with severe aortic stenosis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82:2111–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, et al. 2008 Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease). Endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:e1–142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bramstedt KA. Aortic valve replacement in the elderly: frequently indicated yet frequently denied. Gerontology. 2003;49:46–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Asimakopoulos F, Edwards MB, Taylor KM. Aortic valve replacement in patients 80 years of age and older: survival and cause of death based on 1100 cases: collective results from the UK Heart Valve Registry. Circulation. 1997;96:3403–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fruitman DS, MacDougall CE, Ross DB. Cardiac surgery in octogenarians: can elderly patients benefit? Quality of life after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:2129–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Craver JM, Puskas JD, Weintraub WS, et al. 601 Octogenarians undergoing cardiac surgery: outcome and comparison with younger age groups. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;67:1104–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Grossi EA, Schwartz CF, Yu P-J, et al. High-risk aortic valve replacement: are the outcomes as bad as predicted? Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:102–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Grube E, Schuler G, Buellesfeld L, et al. Percutaneous aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in high-risk patients using the second- and current third-generation self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:69–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Walther T, Simon P, Dewey T, et al. Transapical minimally invasive aortic valve implantation: multicenter experience. Circulation. 2007;116 Suppl 1:I-240–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Webb JG, Chandavimol M, Thompson CR, et al. Percutaneous aortic valve implantation retrograde from the femoral artery. Circulation. 2006;113:842–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Webb JG, Pasupati S, Humphries K, et al. Percutaneous transarterial aortic valve replacement in selected high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2007;116:755–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shahian DM, O’Brien SM, Filardo G, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 3 – valve plus coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88(1 Suppl):S43–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Brown ML, Schaff HV, Sarano ME, et al. Is the European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation model valid for estimating the operative risk of patients considered for percutaneous aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136:566–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ross Jr J, Braunwald E. Aortic stenosis. Circulation. 1968;38:61–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bach DS, Cimino N, Deeb GM. Unoperated patients with severe aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:2018–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bouma BJ, van den Brink RBA, van der Meulen JHP, et al. To operate or not elderly patient with aortic stenosis: the decision and its consequences. Heart. 1999;82:143–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Varadarajan P, Kappor N, Bansal RC, Pai RG. Survival in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis is dramatically improved by aortic valve replacement: results from a cohort of 277 patients aged > or =80 years. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;30:722–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kojodjojo P, Gohil N, Barker D, et al. Outcomes of elderly patients aged 80 and over with symptomatic, severe aortic stenosis: impact of patient’s choice of refusing aortic valve replacement on survival. Q J Med. 2008;101:567–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kapadia SR, Goel SS, Svensson L, et al. Characterization and outcome of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis referred for percutaneous aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137:1430–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lieberman EB, Bashore TM, Hermiller JB, Wilson JS, Pieper KS, Keeler GP, et al. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty in adults: failure of procedure to improve long-term survival. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26:1522–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Otto CM, Mickel MC, Kennedy JW, Alderman EL, Bashmore TM, Block PC, et al. Three-year outcome afer balloon aortic valvuloplasty. Insight into prognosis of valvular aortic stenosis. Circulation. 1994;89:642–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ribera Casado JM. Cardiac surgery and the elderly. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2008;61:564–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Coromilas J. Obesity and atrial fibrillation: is one epidemic feeding the other? JAMA. 2004;292:2519–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Rosborough D. Cardiac surgery in elderly patients. Crit Care Nurse. 2006;26:24–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Dewey TM, Herbert MA. Predicting operative risk: a worthy task – an elusive goal, Editorial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;36:797–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Leontyev S, Walther T, Borger MA, et al. Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: utility of risk stratification with EuroSCORE. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87:1440–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wendt D, Osswald BR, Kayser K, et al. Society of Thoracic Surgeons score is superior to the EuroSCORE determining mortality in high risk patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:468–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kalavrouziotis D, Li D, Buth KJ, Légaré JF. The European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE) is not appropriate for withholding surgery in high-risk patients with aortic stenosis: a restrospective cohort study. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;4:32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Osswald BR, Gegouskov V, Badowski-Zyla D, Tochtermann U, Thomas G, Hagl S, et al. Overestimation of aortic valve replacement risk by EuroSCORE: implications for percutaneous valve replacement. Eur Heart J. 2009;30:74–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Dewey TM, Brown D, Ryan WH, Herbert MA, Prince SL, Mack MJ. Reliability of risk algorithms in predicting early and late operative outcomes in high-risk patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135:180–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. O’Brien SM, Shahian DM, Filardo G, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 2 – isolated valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88(1 Suppl):S23–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Thourani VH, Keeling WB, Guyton RA, Dara A, Hurst SD, Lattouf OM. Outcomes of off-pump aortic valve bypass surgery for the relief of aortic stenosis in adults. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91(1):131–6.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Melby SJ, Zierer A, Kaiser SP, et al. Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: risk factors for early and late mortality. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:1651–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Chiappini B, Camurri N, Loforte A, Di Marco L, Di Bartolomeo R, Marinelli G. Outcome after aortic valve replacement in octogenarians. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78:85–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Cerillo AG, Al Kodami AA, Solinas M, et al. Aortic valve surgery in the elderly patient: a retrospective review. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2007;6:308–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Likosky DS, Sorensen MJ, Dacey LJ, et al. Long-term survival of the very elderly undergoing aortic valve surgery. Circulation. 2009;120 Suppl 1:S127–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kirsch M, Guesnier L, LeBesnerais P, et al. Cardiac operations in octogenarians: perioperative risk factors for death and impaired autonomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66:60–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Kohl P, Lahaye L, Gerard P, et al. Aortic valve replacement in the octogenarians: perioperative outcome and clinical follow-up. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999;16:68–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Huber CH, Goeber V, Berdat P, Carrel T, Eckstein F. Benefits of cardiac surgery in octogenarians – a postoperative quality of life assessment. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007;31:1099–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. de Vincentiis C, Kunkl AB, Trimarchi S, et al. Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: is biologic valve the unique solution? Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:1296–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Odell JA, Mullany CJ, Schaff HV, et al. Aortic valve replacement after previous coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;62:1424–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Cribier A et al. Percutaneous transcatheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis for calcific aortic stenosis: first human case description. Circulation. 2002;106:3006–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Carrel A. On the experimental surgery of the thoracic aorta and heart. Ann Surg. 1910;52:83–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Sarnoff SJ, Donovan TJ, Case RB. The surgical relief of aortic stenosis by means of apical-aortic valvular anastomosis. Circulation. 1955;11:564–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Al-Naaman YD. Bypass procedure for aortic stenosis simplified. Med Trib. 1963;4:27.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Gammie JS, Brown JW, Brown JM, et al. Aortic valve bypass for the high-risk patient with aortic stenosis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81:1605–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Vassiliades Jr TA. Off-pump apicoaortic conduit insertion for high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003;23:156–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Gammie JS, Krowsoski LS, Brown JM, et al. Aortic valve bypass surgery: midterm clinical outcomes in a high-risk aortic stenosis population. Circulation. 2008;118:1460–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Lockowandt U. Apicoaortic valved conduit: potential for progress? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;132:796–801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Brown JW, Girod DA, Hurwitz RA, et al. Apicoaortic valved conduits for complex left ventricular outflow obstruction: technical considerations and current status. Ann Thorac Surg. 1984;38:162–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Behrendt DM, Rocchini A. Relief of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in infants and small children with valved extracardiac conduits. Ann Thorac Surg. 1987;43:82–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Nihill MR, Cooley DA, Norman JC, Hallman GL, McNamara DG. Hemodynamic observations in patients with left ventricule to aorta conduit. Am J Cardiol. 1980;45:573–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Fogel M, Rychik J, Chin A, Hubbard A, Weinberg PM. Evaluation and follow-up of patients with left ventricular apical to aortic conduits with 2D and 3D magnetic resonance imaging and Doppler echocardiography: a new look at an old operation. Am Heart J. 2001;141:630–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Thourani VH, Ailawadi G, Szeto WY, et al. Outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients: a multiinstitutional study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91(1):49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Shontz RD, Finley AC, Thourani V, Sniecinski RM. The use of transesophageal echocardiography for placement of apicoaortic conduit in a patient with a porcelain aorta. Anesth Analg. 2010;110:728–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Andersen HR et al. Transluminal implantation of artificial heart valves: description of a new expandable aortic valve and initial results with implantation by catheter technique in closed chest pigs. Eur Heart J. 1992;13:704–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Babaliaros V, Cribier A, Agatiello C. Surgery insight: current advances in percutaneous heart valve replacement and repair. Nat Clin Pract. 2006;3:256–64.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Cribier A et al. Early experience with percutaneous transcatheter implantation of heart valve prosthesis for the treatment of end-stage inoperable patients with calcific aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:698–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Tron C et al. The RECAST study: short-term results after percutaneous aortic valve implantation in non-surgical patients with calcific aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2005;112 (Suppl II):2952.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Cribier A, Letac B. Two years’ experience of percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty in aortic stenosis. Herz. 1988;13:110–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Safian RD et al. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty in 170 consecutive patients. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:125–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. NHLBI Balloon Valvuloplasty Registry. Percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty: acute and 30-day follow-up results in 674 patients from the NHLBI Balloon Valvuloplasty Registry. Circulation. 1991;84:2383–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Cribier A, Letac B. Percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty in adults with calcific aortic stenosis. Curr Opin Cardiol. 1991;6:212–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Grube E et al. Percutaneous implantation of the MCV self-expanding valve prosthesis in high-risk patients with aortic valve disease: the Siegburg first-in-man study. Circulation. 2006;114:1616–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vinod H. Thourani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thourani, V.H., Guyton, R.A. (2011). Surgical Treatment of Aortic Valve Disease in the Elderly. In: Katlic, M. (eds) Cardiothoracic Surgery in the Elderly. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0892-6_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0892-6_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0891-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0892-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics