Advertisement

Reading Books to Young Children: What It Does and Does Not Do

  • Monique Sénéchal
Chapter
Part of the Literacy Studies book series (LITS, volume 2)

Abstract

The present chapter is an overview of six studies that share a common theme: the contribution of shared reading to child outcomes. The first three studies are experimental in nature and show that the number of times as well as the manner in which adults read to children will affect children’s acquisition of comprehension and spoken vocabulary. The fourth study is an intervention with children who have poor vocabulary skills. The findings revealed that care givers can enhance children’s spoken vocabulary by reading books to them in an interactive manner, and that simply reading in their customary fashion may not promote vocabulary acquisition. The last two studies are correlated. They provide converging evidence that shared reading predicts children’s vocabulary, and that, children’s vocabulary is a robust predictor of reading comprehension. These studies also show the limits of shared reading because parent reports of shared reading did not predict children’s early literacy skills or word reading at the end of grade 1.

Keywords

Reading Comprehension Early Childhood Educator Reading Fluency Phoneme Awareness Literacy Experience 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anderson, J. (1995). How parents’ perceptions of literacy acquisition relate to their children’s emergent literacy knowledge. Reading Horizons, 35, 209–228.Google Scholar
  2. de Jong, P. F., & Leseman, P. P. M. (2001). Lasting effects of home literacy on reading achievement in school. Journal of School Psychology, 39(5), 389–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hargrave, A. C., & Sénéchal, M. (2000). Book reading interventions with language-delayed preschool children: the benefits of regular reading and dialogic reading. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 15, 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Jordan, G. E., Snow, C. E., & Porche, M. V. (2000). Project EASE: the effect of a family literacy project on kindergarten students’ early literacy skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 524–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Scarborough, H. S. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: evidence, theory, and practice. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 97–110). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  6. Sénéchal, M. (2006). Testing the home literacy model: parent involvement in kindergarten is differentially related to grade 4 reading comprehension, fluency, spelling, and reading for pleasure. Journal for the Scientific Study of Reading, 10(1), 59–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Sénéchal, M. (2003). Read it again, Pam! On the importance of repeated reading for the development of language. In L. Girolametto & E. Weitzman (Eds.), Enhancing caregiver language facilitation in child care settings (pp. 6:1–6:9). Toronto: The Hanen Centre. Reproduced by the author with permission from The Hanen Centre.Google Scholar
  8. Sénéchal, M. (1997). The differential effect of storybook reading on preschooler’s expressive and receptive vocabulary acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 24, 123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sénéchal, M., & Cornell, E. H. (1993). Vocabulary acquisition through shared reading experiences. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 360–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sénéchal, M., & LeFevre, J. (2002). Parental involvement in the development of children’s reading skill: a 5-year longitudinal study. Child Development, 73, 445–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sénéchal, M., LeFevre, J., Thomas, E., & Daley, K. (1998). Differential effects of home literacy experiences on the development of oral and written language. Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 96–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sénéchal, M., Thomas, E., & Monker, J. (1995). Individual differences in 4-year-olds’ ability to learn new vocabulary. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 218–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Teale, W. H. (1986). Home background and young children’s literacy development. In W. Teale & E. Sulzby (Eds.), Emergent literacy: writing and reading (pp. 173–206). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  14. Whitehurst, G. L., Arnold, D. S., Epstein, J. N., Angell, A. L., Smith, M., & Fischel, J. E. (1994). A picture book reading intervention in day-care and home for children from low-income families. Developmental Psychology, 30, 679–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Whitehurst, G. J., & Lonigan, C. J. (2001). Emergent literacy: development from prereaders to readers. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 11–29). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Carleton UniversityOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations