Abstract
The term lymphoma identifies two distinct groups of tumors: Hodgkin’s disease (HD) and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). Since the late 1970s, significant progress has been made in the elucidation of the pathogenesis of NHL as a clonal malignant expansion of B or T cells. B lymphocytes are generated in the bone marrow as a result of a multistep differentiation process. On entering the germinal center (GC), B cells activate into centroblasts, proliferate, and mature into centrocytes. Cells that have exited the GC have two fates: differentiation into either plasma cells or into memory B cells. Based on the absence or presence of somatic immunoglobulin (Ig) hypermutation, B-cell NHL can be grouped into two broad histogenetic categories: One derived from pre-GC B cells and devoid of Ig mutations (mantle cell lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma), and the other derived from B cells that have transited through the GC and harbor Ig mutations (follicular lymphoma, lymphoplasmacytoid lymphoma, mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma, diffuse large cell lymphoma, Burkitt’s lymphoma). The pathogenesis of lymphoma represents a multistep process involving the progressive and clonal accumulation of multiple genetic lesions affecting protooncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. The genome of lymphoma cells is relatively stable and is characterized by few nonrandom chromosomal abnormalities, commonly represented by chromosomal translocations. A new classification, called the Revised European-American Lymphoma, was created in the early 1990s to establish definitions for distinct lymphomatous diseases based on morphologic, clinical, immunophenotypic, and molecular genetic features (Table 28.1).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Sandlund JT, Downing JR, Crist WM. Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in childhood. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:1238–41.
Jemal A, Thomas A, Murray T, et al. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002;52:23–47.
Newton R, Ferlay J, Beral V, et al. The epidemiology of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: comparison of nodal and extranodal sites. Int J Cancer. 1997;72:923–7.
Glass AG, Karnell LH, Menck HR. The national cancer data base report on non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Cancer. 1997;80:2311–20.
Weisenburger D. The International Lymphoma Study Group classification of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: pathology findings from a large multicenter study. Mod Pathol. 1997;10:136A.
Larcos G, Farlow DC, Antico VF, et al. The role of high dose Ga-67 scintigraphy in staging untreated patients with lymphoma. Austr N Z J Med. 1994;24:5–8.
Tatsumi M, Kitayama H, Sugahara H, et al. Whole-body hybrid PET with F-18 FDG in the staging of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:601–8.
Carr R, Barrington S, Madam B, et al. Detection of lymphoma in bone marrow by whole-body positron emission tomography. Blood. 1998;91:3340–6.
Finkelstein JD, Martin JJ. Methionine metabolism in mammals. J Biol Chem. 1986;26:1582–7.
Leskinen-Kallio S, Ruotsalainem U, Nägren K, et al. Uptake of C-11 methionine and fluorodeoxyglucose in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a PET study. J Nucl Med. 1991;32:1211–8.
Rodriguez M, Rehn S, Ahlstrom H, et al. Predicting malignancy grade with PET in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Nucl Med. 1995;36:1790–6.
Sutinen E, Jyrkio S, Varpula M, et al. Nodal staging of lymphoma with whole-body PET: comparison of C-11 methionine and FDG. J Nucl Med. 2000;41:1980–8.
Kubota R, Kubota K, Yamada S, et al. Methionine uptake by tumor tissue: a microautoradiographic comparison with FDG. J Nucl Med. 1995;36:484–92.
Charion M, Beyer T, Kinahan PE, et al. Whole-body FDG PET and CT imaging of malignancies using a combined PET/CT scanner. J Nucl Med. 1999;40:256.
Moog F, Kotzerke J, Reske SN. FDG-PET can replace bone scintigraphy in primary staging of malignant lymphoma. J Nucl Med. 1999;40:1407–13.
Lapela M, Leskinen-Kallio S, Minn H, et al. Increased glucose metabolism in untreated non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a study with PET and F-18 FDG. Blood. 1995;9:3522–7.
Hoffman JM, Waskin HA, Schifter T, et al. FDG-PET in differentiating lymphoma from nonmalignant central nervous system lesions in patients with AIDS. J Nucl Med. 1993;34:567–75.
DeVita VT, Cannelos GP. The lymphomas. Semin Hematol. 1999;36:84–94.
Surbone A, Longo DL, DeVita VL, et al. Residual abdominal masses in aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma after combination chemotherapy; significance and management. J Clin Oncol. 1988;6:1832–7.
Janicek M, Kaplan W, Neuberg D, et al. Early restaging gallium scans predict outcome in poor prognosis patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma treated with high-dose CHOP chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:1631–7.
Front D, Bar-Shalom R, Mor M, et al. Aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: early prediction of outcome with Ga-67 scintigraphy. Radiology. 2000;214:253–7.
Hill M, Cunningham D, MacVicar D, et al. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in predicting relapse in residual masses after treatment of lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 1993;11:2273–8.
Kostakoglu L, Leonard JP, Coleman M, et al. Comparison of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET and Ga-67 scintigraphy in evaluation of lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2000;19:10a.
Mikhaeel NG, Timothy AR, Hain SF, O’Doherty MJ. F-18 FDG PET for the assessment of residual masses on CT following treatment of lymphomas. Ann Oncol. 2000;11:147–50.
Romer W, Hanauske A, Ziegler S, et al. Positron emission tomography in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: assessment of chemotherapy with fluorodeoxyglucose. Blood. 1998;91:4464–71.
Kostakoglu L, Coleman M, Leonard JP, et al. PET predicts prognosis after 1 cycle of chemotherapy in aggressive lymphoma and Hodgkin’s disease. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:1018–27.
Jerusalem G, Beguin Y, Fassotte MF, et al. Whole-body PET using F-18 FDG for post-treatment evaluation in Hodgkin’s disease and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma has higher diagnostic and prognostic value than classical CT scan imaging. Blood. 1999;94:429–33.
Torizuka T, Zasadny KR, Kison PV, et al. Metabolic response of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma to I-131 anti-B1 radioimmunotherapy: evaluation with FDG PET. J Nucl Med. 2000;41:999–1005.
Hernandez-Maraver D, Hernandez-Navarro F, Gomez-Leon N, et al. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography: diagnostic accuracy in lymphoma. Br J Haematol. 2006;135(3):293–302.
Schaefer NG, Strobel K, Taverna C, Hany TF. Bone involvement in patient with lymphoma: the role of FDG-PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imag. 2007;34(1):60–7.
Querellou S, Valette F, Bodet-Milin C, et al. FDG-PET/CT predicts outcome in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and Hodgkin’s disease. Ann Hematol. 2006;85(11):759–67.
Strobel K, Schaefer NG, Renner C, et al. Cost-effectiveness therapy remission assessment in lymphoma patients using 2-F-18 fluor-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography: is an end of treatment exam necessary in all patients? Ann Oncol. 2007;18(4):658–64.
Schaefer NG, Hany TF, Taverna C, et al. Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and Hodgkin’s disease: coregistered FDG PET and CT at staging and restaging- do we need contrast-enhanced CT? Radiology. 2004;232(2):823–9.
Hoskin PJ. FDG PET in the management of lymphoma: a clinical perspective. Eur J Nucl Med. 2002;29:449–51.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kim, E.E., Wong, F.C.L. (2013). Lymphoma. In: Kim, E., Lee, MC., Inoue, T., Wong, WH. (eds) Clinical PET and PET/CT. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0802-5_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0802-5_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0801-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0802-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)