Skip to main content

Breeding Plans

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Handbook of Plant Breeding ((HBPB,volume 6))

Abstract

Adaptation of germplasm and maximization of its germplasm improvement are necessary pre-breeding goals for any applied maize breeding program developing cultivars. Recurrent selection methods can contribute to meeting the goals of continuous genetic improvement for significant genetic gains. These methods are complementary to inbred line development methods (e.g., pedigree selection, doubled -haploids) as they provide improved progenies cyclically, the same way half-sib progenies provided B73. They will not replace other breeding methods, but should be integrated with them (Hallauer 1981, 1985, 1992; Pandey and Gardner 1992; Carena and Wicks III 2006; Carena, 2008; Hallauer and Carena, 2009). However, very few breeding programs are still active with intra- and inter-population recurrent selection programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baker, L. H., and R. N. Curnow. 1969. Choice of population size and use of variation between replicate populations in plant breeding selection programs. Crop Sci. 9:555–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R. J. 1986. Selection Indices in Plant Breeding. CRC, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barata, C., and M. J. Carena. 2006. Classification of North Dakota maize inbred lines into heterotic groups based on molecular and testcross data. Euphytica 151:339–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo, R. 1996. Best linear unbiased prediction of maize single-cross performance. Crop Sci. 36:50–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betran, F. J., and A. R. Hallauer. 1996. Hybrid improvement after reciprocal recurrent selection in BSSS and BSCB1 maize populations. Maydica 41:25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, J. W., L. H. Penny, A. R. Hallauer, and S. A. Eberhart. 1971. Evaluation of synthetic populations developed from a maize population (BSK) by two methods of recurrent selection. Crop Sci. 11:361–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carena, M. J. 2005. Maize commercial hybrids compared to improved population hybrids for grain yield and agronomic performance. Euphytica 141:201–08.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carena, M. J. 2008. Increasing the genetic diversity of northern U.S. maize hybrids: Integrating pre-breeding with cultivar development. In Conventional and Molecular Breeding of Field and Vegetable Crops. Novi Sad, Serbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carena, M. J., and H. Z. Cross. 2003. Plant density and maize germplasm improvement in the northern corn belt. Maydica 48:105–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carena, M. J., and A. R. Hallauer. 2001a. Response to inbred progeny recurrent selection in Leaming and Midland Yellow Dent populations. Maydica 46:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carena, M. J., and A. R. Hallauer. 2001b. Expression of heterosis in Leaming and Midland Corn Belt dent populations. J. Iowa Acad. Sci. 108:73–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carena, M. J., and Z. W. Wicks III. 2006. Maize early maturing hybrids: an exploitation of U.S. temperate public genetic diversity in reserve. Maydica 51:201–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carena, M. J., C. eno, and D. W. Wanner. 2008. Registration of NDBS11(FR-M)C3, NDBS1011, and NDBSK(HI-M)C3 Maize Germplasm. J. Plant Reg. 2:132–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carena, M. J., I. Santiago, and A. Ordas. 1998. Direct and correlated response to selection for prolificacy in Maize at two planting densities. Maydica 43:95–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carena, M. J., G. Bergman, N. Riveland, E. Eriksmoen, and M. Halvorson. 2009a. Breeding Maize for Higher Yield and Quality under Drought Stress. Maydica 54:287–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carena, M. J., L. Pollak, W. Salhuana, and M. Denuc. 2009b. Development of unique lines for early-maturing hybrids: Moving GEM germplasm northward and westward. Euphytica 170:87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carena, M. J., J. Yang, J. C. Caffarel, M. Mergoum, A. R. Hallauer. 2009c. Do different production environments justify separate maize breeding programs? Euphytica 169:141–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Compton, W. A., and R. E. Comstock. 1976. More on modified ear-to-row selection in corn. Crop Sci. 16:122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comstock, R. E. 1979. Use of inbred lines in reciprocal recurrent selection. Crop Sci. 19:881–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comstock, R. E., H. F. Robinson, and P. H. Harvey. 1949. A breeding procedure designed to make maximum use of both general and specific combining ability. Agron. J. 41:360–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darrah, L. L., S. A. Eberhart, and L. H. Penny. 1978. Six years of maize selection in Kitale Synthetic II, Ecuador 573, and Kitale Composite, using methods of the comprehensive breeding system. Euphytica 27:191–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devey, M. E., and W. A. Russell. 1983. Evaluation of recurrent selection for stalk quality in a maize cultivar and effects of other agronomic traits. Iowa State J. Res. 58:207–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhillon, B. S., and A. S. Khehra. 1989. Modified S1 recurrent selection in maize improvement. Crop Sci. 29:226–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowswell, C. R., R. L. Paliwal, and R. P. Cantrell. 1996. Maize in the Third World. Westview, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley, J. W., and R. H. Moll. 1969. Interpretation and uses of estimates of heritability and genetic variances in plant breeding. Crop Sci. 9:257–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudley, J. W., and R. J. Lambert. 2004. 100 generations of selection for oil and protein in corn. Plant Breed. Rev. 24:79–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duvick, D. N. 1977. Genetic rates of gain in hybrid maize yields during the past 40 years. Maydica 22:187–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duvick, D. N., J. S. C. Smith, and M. Cooper. 2004. Changes in performance, parentage, and genetic diversity of successful corn hybrids, 1930–2000. In Corn: Origin, History, and Production, C. W. Smith, J. Betran, and E. C. A. Runge, (eds.), pp. 65–97. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • East, E. M. 1908. Inbreeding in corn. Connecticut Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 165:419–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhart, S. A. 1970. Factors affecting efficiencies of breeding methods. African Soils 15:669–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhart, S. A., M. N. Harrison, and F. Ogada. 1967. A comprehensive breeding system. Züchter 37:169–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Empig, L. T., C. O. Gardner, and W. A. Compton. 1972. Theoretical gains for different population improvement procedures. Nebraska Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 26:3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyherabide, G. H., and A. R. Hallauer. 1991. Reciprocal full-sib selection in maize. I. Direct and indirect responses. Crop Sci. 31:952–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, C. O. 1977. Quantitative genetic studies and population improvement in maize and sorghum. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Quantitative Genetics, E. Pollak, O. Kempthorne, and T. B. Bailey, Jr., (eds.), pp. 475–89. Iowa State University. Press, Ames, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, C. O. 1978. Population improvement in maize. In Maize Breeding and Genetics, D. B. Walden, (ed.), pp. 207–28. Wiley, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genter, C. F. 1973. Comparison of S1 and testcross evaluation after two cycles of recurrent selection in maize. Crop Sci. 13:524–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genter, C. F., and M. W. Alexander. 1962. Comparative performance of S1 progenies and test-crosses of corn. Crop Sci. 2:516–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gevers, H. O. 1975. Three cycles of reciprocal recurrent selection in maize under two systems of parent selection. Agroplantae 7:107–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer, A. R. 1967a. Development of single-cross hybrids from two-eared maize populations. Crop Sci. 7:192–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer, A. R. 1967b. Performance of single-cross hybrids developed from two-ear varieties. Annu. Hybrid Corn Ind. Res. Conf. Proc. 22:74–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer, A. R. 1973a. Recurrent selection for polygenic resistance. Report of workshop on the downy mildews of sorghum and corn. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. Tech. Bull. 74-1:32–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer, A. R. 1973b. Hybrid development and population improvement in maize by reciprocal full-sib selection. Egyptian J. Genet. Cytol. 1:84–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer, A. R. 1978. Recurrent selection programs. Ill. Corn Breed Sch. 14:28–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer, A. R. 1981. Selection and breeding methods. In Plant Breeding II, K. J. Frey, (ed.), pp. 3–55. Iowa State University. Press, Ames, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer, A. R. 1984. Reciprocal full sib selection in maize. Crop Sci. 7:55–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer, A. R. 1985. Compendium of recurrent selection methods and their application. Critical Rev. Plant Sci. 3:1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer, A. R. 1992. Recurrent selection in maize. Plant Breed. Rev. 9:115–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer, A. R. 1999. Conversion of tropical germplasm for temperate area use. Ill. Corn Breeders’ Sch. 35:20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer, A. R. 2007. History, contribution, and future of quantitative genetics in plant breeding; Lessons from maize. In International Plant Breeding Symposium, R. Bernardo, (ed.), pp. 4–19. August 20–26, 2006, Mexico City. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer, A. R., and M. J. Carena. 2009. Maize breeding. In Handbook of Plant Breeding: Cereals, M. J. Carena, (ed.), pp. 3–98. Springer, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer, A. R., and S. A. Eberhart. 1970. Reciprocal full-sib selection. Crop Sci. 10:315–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer, A. R., W. A. Russell, and K. R. Lamkey. 1988. Corn breeding. In Corn and Corn Improvement, 3rd ed., G. F. Sprague and J. W. Dudley, (eds.), pp. 463–564. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer, A. R., A. J. Ross, and M. Lee. 2004. Long-term divergent selection for ear length in maize. In Plant Breeding Review, Vol. 24, Part 2, J. Janick, (ed.), pp. 153–68. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, W. D. 1959. The breakup of initial linkage blocks under selected mating systems. Genetics 44:857–68.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. E., C. O. Gardner, and W. A. Compton. 1972. Effects of mass selection and irradiation in corn measured by random S1 lines and their testcrosses. Crop Sci. 12:594–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoegemeyer, T. C., and A. R. Hallauer. 1976. Selection among and within full-sib families to develop single crosses of maize. Crop Sci. 16:76–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, C. G. 1899. Improvement in the chemical composition of the corn kernel. Ill. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 55:205–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horner, E. S., H. W. Lundy, M. C. Lutrick, and W. H. Chapman. 1973. Comparison of three methods of recurrent selection in maize. Crop Sci. 13:485–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horner, E. S., M. C. Lutrick, W. H. Chapman, and F. G. Martin. 1976. Effect of recurrent selection for combining ability with a single-cross tester in maize. Crop Sci. 16:5–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horner, E. S., E. Magloira, and J. A. Morera. 1989. Comparison of selection for S2 progeny vs. testcross performance for population improvement in maize. Crop Sci. 29:868–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, F. G. 1945. Recurrent selection and specific combining ability in corn. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 37:134–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyrkas, A. K., and M. J. Carena. 2005. Response to long-term selection in early maturing synthetic varieties. Euphytica 143:43–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, M. T. 1940. Segregation of genes affecting yield of grain in maize. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 32:55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, M. T. 1978. Maize breeding during the development and early years of hybrid maize. In Maize Breeding and Genetics, D. B. Walden, (ed.), pp. 13–28. Wiley, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jinahyon, S., and W. A. Russell. 1969a. Evaluation of recurrent selection for stalk-rot resistance in an open-pollinated variety of maize. Iowa State J. Sci. 43:229–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jinahyon, S., and W. A. Russell. 1969b. Effects of recurrent selection for stalk-rot resistance on other agronomic characters in an open-pollinated variety of maize. Iowa State J. Sci. 43:239–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L. P., W. A. Compton, and C. O. Gardner. 1971. Comparison of full-and half-sib reciprocal recurrent selection. Theor. Appl. Genet. 41:36–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeratinijakal, V., and K. R. Lamkey. 1993. Responses to reciprocal recurrent selection in BSSS and BSCB1 maize populations. Crop Sci. 33:73–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klenke, J. R., W. A. Russell, and W. D. Guthrie. 1986. Recurrent selection for resistance to European corn borer in a corn synthetic and correlated effects on agronomic traits. Crop Sci. 26:864–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latter, B. D. H. 1965. The response to artificial selection due to autosomal genes of large effect. II. The effects of linkage on limits to selection in finite populations. Australian J. Biol. Sci. 18:1009–23.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Latter, B. D. H. 1966a. The response to artificial selection due to autosomal genes of large effect. III. The effects of linkage on the rate of advance and approach to fixation in finite populations. Australian J. Biol. Sci. 19:131–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latter, B. D. H. 1966b. The interaction between effective population size and linkage intensity under artificial selection. Genet. Res. Comb. 7:313–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonnquist, J. H. 1964. A modification of the ear-to-row procedure for the improvement of maize populations. Crop Sci. 4:227–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonnquist, J. H., and M. F. Lindsey. 1964. Topcross versus S1 line performance in corn (Zea mays L.). Crop Sci. 8:50–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquez-Sanchez, F. 1982. Modifications to cyclic hybridization in maize with single-eared plants. Crop Sci. 22:314–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquez-Sanchez, F., and A. R. Hallauer. 1970a. Influence of sample size on the estimation of genetic variances in a synthetic variety of maize. I. Grain yield. Crop Sci. 10:357–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquez-Sanchez, F., and A. R. Hallauer. 1970b. Influence of sample size on the estimation of genetic variance in a synthetic variety of maize. II. Plant and ear characters. Iowa State J. Sci. 44:423–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K. 1949. Biometrical Genetics. Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikel, M. A. 2006. Availability and analysis of proprietary dent corn inbred lines with expired U.S. Plant Variety Protection. Crop Sci. 46:2555–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikel, M. A., and J. W. Dudley. 2006. Evolution of North American dent corn from public to proprietary germplasm. Crop Sci. 46:1193–05.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moll, R. H., and C. W. Stuber. 1971. Comparisons of response to alternative selection procedures initiated with two populations of maize (Zea mays L.). Crop Sci. 11:706–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moll, R. H., and C. W. Stuber. 1974. Quantitative genetics. Empirical results relevant to plant breeding. Adv. Agron. 26:277–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moll, R. H., A. Bari, and C. W. Stuber. 1977. Frequency distributions of maize yield before and after reciprocal recurrent selection. Crop Sci. 17:794–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noble, S. W. 1966. Sampling of heterogeneous testers and the comparison of a double cross with parental and non-parental single crosses as testers for the evaluation of maize lines. Ph.D. dissertation, Iowa State University., Ames, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obilana, A. T., A. R. Hallauer, and O. S. Smith. 1979a. Estimation of genetic components of variance in the interpopulation formed by crossing two maize synthetics, BS10 and BS11. J. Hered. 70:127–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obilana, A. T., A. R. Hallauer, and O. S. Smith. 1979b. Predicted and observed response to reciprocal full-sib selection in maize. Egyptian J. Genet. Cytol. 8:269–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, S., and C. O. Gardner. 1992. Recurrent selection for population, variety, and hybrid improvement in tropical maize. Adv. Agron. 48:1–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paterniani, E. 1967a. Selection among and within half-sib families in a Brazilian population of maize (Zea mays L.). Crop Sci. 7:212–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paterniani, E. 1967b. Interpopulation improvement: Reciprocal recurrent selection variations. Maize 8, CIMMYT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterniani, E., and R. Vencovsky. 1977. Reciprocal recurrent selection in maize (Zea mays L.) based on testcrosses of half-sib families. Maydica 22:141–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterniani, E., and R. Vencovsky. 1978. Reciprocal recurrent selection based on half-sib progenies and prolific plants in maize (Zea mays L.). Maydica 23:209–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penny, L. H., and S. A. Eberhart. 1971. Twenty years of reciprocal recurrent selection with two synthetic varieties of maize. Crop Sci. 11:900–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penny, L. H., G. E. Scott, and W. D. Guthrie. 1967. Recurrent selection for European corn borer resistance. Crop Sci. 7:407–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesek, J., and R. J. Baker. 1969. Desired improvement in relation to selection indices. Canadian J. Plant Sci. 49:803–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawlings, J. O. 1970. Present status of research on long- and short-term recurrent selection in finite populations – choice of population size. Proc. Second Meet. Work. Group Quant. Genet., sect. 22. IUFRO, Raleigh, NC, pp. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinke, E. H., and J. C. Sentz. 1962. Moving Corn belt germplasm northward. Proc. Hyb. Corn. Ind. Res. Conf. 16:53–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, A. 1960. A theory of limits in artificial selection. Proc. R. Soc. London B153: 234–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, O. A., and A. R. Hallauer. 1991. Variation among full-sib families of corn in different generations of inbreeding. Crop Sci. 31:43–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, W. A. 1974. Comparative performance for maize hybrids representing different eras of maize breeding. Annu. Corn Sorghum Res. Conf. Proc.. 29:81–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, W. A. 1986. Contribution of breeding to maize improvement in the United States, 1920's-1980’s. Iowa State J. Res. 61:5–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, W. A., and S. A. Eberhart. 1975. Hybrid performance of selected maize lines from reciprocal recurrent and testcross selection programs. Crop Sci. 15:1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sezegen, B., and M. J. Carena. 2009. Divergent recurrent selection for cold tolerance in two improved maize populations. Euphytica 167:237–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shull, G. H. 1908. The composition of a field of maize. Am. Breeders’ Assoc. Rep. 4:296–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shull, G. H. 1909. A pure line method of corn breeding. Am. Breeders’ Assoc. Rep. 5:51–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shull, G. H. 1910. Hybridization methods in corn breeding. Am. Breeders' Mag. 1:98–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. F. 1936. A discriminant function for plant selection. Ann. Eugen. 7:240–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, O. S. 1979. A model for evaluating progress from recurrent selection. Crop Sci. 19:223–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, O. S., A. R. Hallauer, and W. A. Russell. 1981. Use of selection index in recurrent selection programs in maize. Euphytica 30:611–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprague, G. F. 1939. An estimation of the number of top-crossed plants required for adequate representation of a corn variety. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 31:11–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprague, G. F. 1952. Additional studies of the relative effectiveness of two systems of selection for oil content of the corn kernel. Agron. J. 44:329–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprague, G. F., and S. A. Eberhart. 1977. Corn breeding. In Corn and Corn Improvement, G. F. Sprague, (ed.), pp. 305–62. American. Society of Agronomy., Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subandi, W., W. A. Compton, and L. T. Empig. 1973. Comparison of the efficiencies of selection indices for three traits in two variety crosses of corn. Crop Sci. 13:184–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suwantaradon, K., and S. A. Eberhart. 1974. Developing hybrids from two improved maize populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 44:206–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suwantaradon, K., S. A. Eberhart, J. J. Mock, J. C. Owens, and W. D. Guthrie. 1975. Index selection for several agronomic traits in the BSSS 2 maize population. Crop Sci. 15:827–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, A. H., and O. S. Smith. 1987. Comparison of half-sib and S1 recurrent selection in Krug Yellow Dent maize populations. Crop Sci. 27:509–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walejko, R. N., and W. A. Russell. 1977. Evaluation of recurrent selection for specific combining ability in two open-pollinated maize cultivars. Crop Sci. 17:647–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webel, O. D., and J. H. Lonnquist. 1967. An evaluation of modified ear-to-row selection in a population of corn (Zea mays L.). Crop Sci. 7:651–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weyhrich, R. A., K. R. Lamkey, and A. R. Hallauer. 1998a. Responses to seven methods of recurrent selection in the BS11 maize population. Crop Sci. 38:308–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weyhrich, R. A., K. R. Lamkey, and A. R. Hallauer. 1998b. Effective population size and response to S1-progeny selection in the BS11 maize population. Crop Sci. 38:1149–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. S. 1962. The evaluation of a selection index. Biometrics 18:375–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, W. P., and F. M. Davis. 1983. Recurrent selection for resistance in corn to tunnelling by the second broad southwestern corn borer. Crop Sci. 23:169–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J., M. J. Carena, and J. Uphaus. 2010. AUDCC: A method to evaluate rate of dry down in maize. Crop Sci. (in press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arnel R. Hallauer .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hallauer, A.R., Filho, J.B.M., Carena, M.J. (2010). Breeding Plans. In: Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding. Handbook of Plant Breeding, vol 6. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0766-0_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics