Breeding Objectives in Forages

Part of the Handbook of Plant Breeding book series (HBPB, volume 5)

Abstract

All breeding programs share one common objective – to improve a species for use within a target population of environments and a particular agricultural context. Beyond this common goal, the objectives of forage breeding programs are as varied as the species upon which they are based and the breeders who develop and implement them. Many breeding objectives are determined a priori by the choice of a species with one or more obvious trait limitations or deficiencies, such as poor seedling vigor, synthesis of toxic alkaloids, or severe susceptibility to a major pest. For species without such limitations, breeders have the luxury of defining less stringent and/or more flexible breeding objectives.

Keywords

Biomass Fermentation Estrogen Recombination Lignin 

References

  1. Abberton, M.T. and Marshall, A.H. 2005. Progress in breeding perennial clovers for temperate agriculture. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 143:117–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Basso, C.F., Hurkman, M.M., Riedeman, E.S. and Tracy, W.F. 2008. Divergent selection for vegetative phase change in maize and indirect effects on response to Puccinia sorghi. Crop Sci. 48:992–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bouton, J.H. and Gates, R.N. 2003. Grazing-tolerant alfalfa cultivars perform well under rotational stocking and hay management. Agron. J. 95:1461–1464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Casler, M.D. 2001. Breeding forage crops for increased nutritional value. Advan. Agron. 71:51–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Casler, M.D. 2005. Agricultural fitness of smooth bromegrass populations selected for divergent fiber concentration. Crop Sci. 45:36–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Casler, M.D., Pedersen, J.F., Eizenga, G.C. and Stratton, S.D. 1996. Germplasm and cultivar development. In: L.E. Moser et al. (eds.) Cool-season forage grasses. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp. 413–469.Google Scholar
  7. Casler, M.D. and Pederson, G.A. 1996. Host resistance and tolerance and its deployment. In: S. Chakraborty et al. (eds.) Pasture and forage crop pathology. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp. 475–507.Google Scholar
  8. Casler, M.D. and Vogel, K.P. 1999. Accomplishments and impact from breeding for increased forage nutritional value. Crop Sci. 39:12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cockram, J., Jones, H., Leigh, F.J. et al. 2007. Control of flowering time in temperate cereals: genes, domestication, and sustainable productivity. J. Exp. Bot. 58:1231–1244.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Elgin, J.H. 1985. The alfalfa anthracnose resistance success story. In: Proceedings of XV International Grassland Congress, 24–31 August 1985, Kyoto, Japan. Japanese Soc. Grassl. Sci. Natl. Grassl. Res. Inst., Nishi-nasumo, Tochigi-ken, Japan, pp. 237–238.Google Scholar
  11. Gates, R.N., Hill, G.M. and Burton, G.W. 1999. Response of selected and unselected bahiagrass populations to defoliation. Agron. J. 91:787–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hides, D.H. 1979. Winter hardiness in Lolium multiflorum Lam. III. Selection for improved cold tolerance and its effect on agronomic performance. Grass Forage Sci. 34:119–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Humphreys, M.O. 1989. Water-soluble carbohydrates in perennial ryegrass breeding. I. Genetic differences among cultivars and hybrid progeny grown as spaced plants. Grass Forage Sci. 44:231–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Humphreys, M.O. 1999. The contribution of conventional plant breeding to forage crop improvement. In; J.G. Buchanan-Smith et al. (eds.) Proc XVIII Intl Grassl Congr, 8–19 June 1997, Winnipeg and Saskatoon, Canada. Assoc. Mgmt. Centre, Calgary, AB, pp. 71–78.Google Scholar
  15. Humphreys, M.O. 2005. Genetic improvement of forage crops – past, present, and future. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 143:441–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jensen, K.B., Peel, M.D., Waldron. B.L., et al. 2005. Persistence after three cycles of selection in New-Hy RS-wheatgrass (Elymus hoffmannii K.B. Jensen & Asay) at increased salinity levels. Crop Sci. 45:1717–1720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson, D.A. and Asay, K.H. 1993. Viewpoint: Selection for improved drought response in cool-season grasses. J. Range Mgmt. 46:194–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jones, T.A. and Nielson, D.C. 1999. Intrapopulation genetic variation for seed dormancy in Indian ricegrass. J. Range Mgmt. 52:646–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lamb, J.F.S., Sheaffer, C.C., Rhodes, L.H., et al. 2006. Five decades of alfalfa cultivar improvement: impact on forage yield, persistence, and nutritive value. Crop Sci. 46:902–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marten, G.C. 1989. Breeding forage grasses to maximize animal performance. In: D.A. Sleper, et al. (eds.) Contributions from breeding forage and turf grasses. Crop Science Society of America Spec. Publ. 15, Madison, WI, pp. 71–104.Google Scholar
  21. McDonald, M.F., Anwar, M. and Keogh, R.G. 1994. Reproductive performance of ewes after grazing on G27 red clover, a low formononetin selection in cultivar Pawera. Proc. NZ Soc. Anim. Prod. 54:231–234.Google Scholar
  22. Moseley, G. and Baker, D.H. 1991. The efficacy of a high magnesium grass cultivar in controlling hypomagnasaemia in grazing animals. Grass Forage Sci. 46:375–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Narasimhamoorthy, B., Bouton, J.H., Olsen, K.M. and Sledge, M.K. 2007. Quantitative trait loci and candidate gene mapping of aluminum tolerance in diploid alfalfa. Theor. Appl. Genet. 114:901–913.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Paynel, F., Lesuffleur, F., Bigot, J., Diquélou, S. and Cliquet, J-B. 2008. A study of 15N transfer between legumes and grasses. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 28:281–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pedersen, J.F. and Sleper, D.A. 1988. Considerations in breeding endophyte-free tall fescue forage cultivars. J. Prod. Agric. 1:127–133.Google Scholar
  26. Poethig, R.S. 2003. Phase change and the regulation of developmental timing in plants. Science 301:334–336.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Rapacz, M., Gasior, D., Zwierzykowski, Z., et al. 2004. Changes in cold tolerance and the mechanisms of acclimation of photosystem II to cold hardening generated by anther culture of Festuca pratensis * Lolium multiflorum cultivars. New Phytol. 162:105–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Smith, K.F. and Casler, M.D. 2004. The use of spatially adjusted herbage yields during the analysis of perennial forage grass trials across locations. Crop Sci. 44:56–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith, R.R. and Kretschmer, A.E. Jr. 1989. Breeding and genetics of legume persistence. In: G.C. Marten, et al. (eds.) Persistence of forage legumes. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp. 541–552.Google Scholar
  30. Thomas, H.M., Morgan, W.G. and Humphreys, M.O. 2003. Designing grasses with a future – combining the attributes of Lolium and Festuca. Euphytica 133:19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tilley, J.M.A. and Terry, R.A. 1963. A two-stage technique for in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Br. Grassl. Soc. 18:104–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Walters, R.J.K. 1984. D-value: the significance of small differences on animal performance. In: The grass ley today. Proceedings of 18th NIAB Crop Conference, 12–13 December 1984, Cambridge, UK. Natl. Inst. Agric. Bot. Camb, pp. 60–68.Google Scholar
  33. Wilkins, P.W. and Humphreys, M.O. 2003. Progress in breeding perennial forage grasses for temperature agriculture. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 140:129–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Woodfield, D.R. and Caradus, J.R. 1994. Genetic improvement in white clover representing six decades of plant breeding. Crop Sci. 34:1205–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.U.S. Dairy Forage Research CenterUSDA-ARSMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Agronomy and SoilsAuburn UniversityAuburnUSA

Personalised recommendations